Alleged Racketeering: State of New Jersey Judicary

Standard

AFTER AWAKENING FROM

BENIGN ACCEPTANCE OF CORRUPTION

IN NJ:

I REPORTED THE FOLLOWING CRIMES

TO THE FBI

SEE THE LETTER COMPLAINTS HERE:

2014-10-22 Fax FBI False Claims Act 2014-10-22 – FAX FBI AOC

2014-10-22 Fax FBI False Claims Act

WHEN A MAN IS STRIPPED OF HIS RIGHTS& CHOICE

…HE WILL MAKE THE ONLY CHOICE AVAILABLE

…HE WILL FIGHT

Many of Mr. Syphrett frends, family, non-prPED ofit contacts, former lawyers, and local law enforcement have asked him , what what he is hoping to accomplish, by advocating for his rights:

He was visibly ashamed and timid in his answer to us:

“I am ashamed to say it, but I am still optimistically (without good cause) hoping for justice and the right to my pursuit of happiness, liberty, and freedom…. with my beloved Children.”

“… HONESTLY, I DON’T THINK I HAVE ANY OTHER CHOICE. MY FATHER TAUGHT ME TO BELIEVE THAT THE EASIEST DECISIONS A MAN CAN MAKE, ARE THE ONES WHEN HE IS GIVEN NO CHOICE, AT ALL”

Dr. Vivian Chern Shnaidman: QUESTIONABLE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE – ALLEGEDLY FRAUDULENT EXPERT WITNESS

Standard

(Writers Note: We reached out to Dr. Vivian Chern Shnaidman for any opposing commentary, but we were not able to get a reply from her office at the time of this publication. If we receive one we will publish it)

* BREAKING NEWS *

UPDATE

We received a Response from Dr. Shnaidman to our inquiries, via her direct response to Derek Syphrett via Facebook.

It appears that she does not deny any of the facts reported to us.

Dr. Shnaidman’s Full Response is included below:

FULL STORY, EXCLUDING BREAKING NEWS PUBLISHED ABOVE:

THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE GONE THROUGH A DIVORCE LIKELY REALIZE THAT COURT APPOINTED EXPERTS, ARE SHAMS.

CASE AND POINT:

1) Experts often participate in ex-parte communications with the “court” and the Judge at local Bench Bar Associations (conflict of interests)

2) Experts often rely upon hearsay information without interviewing the real-parties of interests (police, children, DYFS, etc), yet make clinical decisions without clinical observations of facts (this is not scientific and is forbidden by N.J.R.E. 703 and / or F.R.E. 703 – rules of evidence NJ/ Federal

3) Expert witnesses are granted immunity from civil suits or criminal charges related to any fraud they may commit as an expert witness, so they have no reason to tell the truth other than preference, and moral character.

4) Experts often have no actual expertise in parenting-time evaluations (like Dr. Vivian Shnaidman featured below):

DON’T TAKE OUR WORD FOR IT

SEE THE FACTS HERE:

Please see the IMPORTANT REVELATIONS IN OTHER CASES INVOLVING DR. SHNAIDMAN AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION REGARDING YOUR EXPOSURE TO THIS “DOCTOR”: SEE THE FOLLOWING STATE RECORDS AND MEDIA STORIES:

Shnaidman v. State of New Jersey : Dr. Shnaidman was referred to as “Bi-Polar”, “Borderline”, and a “Bitch” by her colleagues at Ann Klein before her employment was terminated, yet she is retained by New Jersey Courts as an expert in parenting time matters, when she actually has no expertise in this area. CITATION: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/nj-superior-court…/1629298.html

Note: Dr. Vivian Shnaidman’s opinion was also thrown out by the appellate court as being RIDICULOUS – SEE CITATIONS HERE:

DR. SHNAIDMAN RECOMMENDS TERMINATING PARENTAL RIGHTS BECAUSE WOMAN WANTED A C-SECTION BIRTH:
LINK: http://theunnecesarean.com/…/refusal-of-unnecesarean…

* OH IT GETS WORSE **

CHECK THIS OUT:

SO IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND THE PUBLIC TRUST PLEASE SEE THE DISCOVERIES LISTED BELOW REGARDING Derek Syphrett’s EXPERIENCE WITH A COURT APPOINTED EXPERT WHO, SUBMITTED A ALLEGEDLY FRAUDULENT EXPERT REPORT:

DR. VIVIAN CHERN SHNAIDMAN (LINK):

ALLEGEDLY COMMITTED FRAUD UPON THE COURT …. SHE IS AN EXPERT IN MALPRACTICE IT TURNS OUT: SHE WITH-HELD THIS INFORMATION AT TRIAL:

Recordings of Vivian Shnaidman during 14 minute interview, where she did no fact finding about parenting time, but later ruled me to be legally incompetent (without any expertise to do so), and ruled me to be unfit to parent (without discussing my parenting time). HER OPINION WAS NOT BASED ON ANY ACCEPTED SCIENTIFIC PRACTICE, AND WAS IN PART SUPPORTED BY HEARSAY FROM PEOPLE SHE NEVER INTERVIEWED (MY LYING WIFE).

EXPERT REPORT STATING THAT DEREK SYPHRETT HALUCINATED DURING A SESSION:

HERE IS WHAT IS ODD ABOUT THIS REPORT:

1) Dr. Shnaidman signed / certified that the subject of the Evaluaton was “Robin Bloom” (We can assume the diagnoses was Robin Blooms, and “Derek Syphrett’s name was added to the narrative of an old evaluation post-hoc)

2) Dr. Shnaidman: states that Mr. Syphrett Hallucinated during the session BUT SHE DOES NOT DESCRIBE THE HALLUCINATION, OR HOW LONG IT LASTED, OR WHAT IT WAS ABOUT, LIKE ANY OTHER REAL DOCTOR WOULD HAVE DONE… SHE THEN LET’S MR. SYPHRETT DRIVE HOME, PURPORTEDLY AFTER OBSERVING THE FACT THAT HE WAS HALLUCINATING… IF THIS IS TRUE THEN IT WOULD BE NEGLIGENT AND A VIOLATION OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.

3) Dr. Shnaidman: Determines that Mr. Syphrett is not fit to represent himself in his legal case, despite not being an expert in the law, AND REMARKABLY: she makes this assertion without reviewing the case files and the recent motions that Mr. Syphrett won the last time he was in court for docket: FM-11-97-11k
Wallace v. Syphrett”!

4) Dr. Shnaidman: Admitted at trial in 2014 – almost a year after the evaluation in 2013, (and after the case was transferred from Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick, for good cause shown, to Burlington and redocketed as FM-03-0790-14) THAT:

SHE NEVER DISCUSSED MR. SYPHRETT’S PARENTING TIME DURING THE EVALUATION AT ALL, BUT:

SHE DETERMINED HE WAS AN UNFIT PARENT WITHOUT REVIEWING HIS SUPERVISED PARENTING TIME, RECORDS THAT WERE UNIVERSALLY POSITIVE ABOUT HIS PARENTING SKILLS!

5) She appeared in court with a fraudulent expert report, that had not been given to the attorneys in the matter, she edited the certification to say the evaluation was for “Derek Syphrett”, when the report submitted to the court stated the evaluation was for “Robin Bloom”.

6) At trial she stated she had no expertise in making parenting time decisions other than:

Talking to parents when she was working in a hospital as a doctor

A DFYS training she did about 10 years earlier, which she had no recollection of the material information or benefits of said training. She in fact said “it wasn’t that helpful”!

EXPERT REPORT FROM WALLACE V. SYPHRETT:

READ IT AND WEEP FOR THE CHILDREN BECAUSE

IT IS CERTIFIED TO BE FOR A WOMAN “ROBIN BLOOM”, NOT MR. SYPHRETT!

2013-05-17 – PSYCH EVAL – SHNAIDMAN

THE COURT ORDER THAT VIOLATED NEW JERSEY LAW BY:

APPOINTING A COURT APPOINTED LAWYER SUA SPONTE, WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE PUT BEFORE THE COURT & WITHOUT ANY OPPORTUNITY FOR A CROSS EXAMINATION:

2013-06-04 – FM-97-13K – ORDER – Appointed Lawyer GAL

THIS IS A CLEAR AND CONVINCING VIOLATION OF MR. SYPHRETT’S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS

A FEDERAL CASE WHICH WILL BE MADE!

A DEFENSE AGAINST COURT CORRUPTION

WORTHY OF RESEARCH:

WE WOULD STOP CONSENTING TO GO TO THESE EXPERT EVALUATIONS AND PRODUCING DISCOVERY THAT DOESN’T EXIST, BY WAIVING YOUR PRIVACY RIGHTS:

SEE: U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISIONS BINDING ON ALL FIFTY STATES

GRISWOLD V. CONNECTICUT

BODDIE V. CONNECTICUT

AT A MINIMAL THESE CASES MAY SUGGEST (IN OUR NON-EXPERT, NON LAWYER CAPACITY, FOR THE PURPOSES OF RESEARCH ONLY): THAT:

1) You Actually Have A Right To Privacy With Regard To Your Family Affairs And Your Thoughts About It, Or Your Relationship With Your Family

2) You Have No Burden Of Proof With Regard To Your Fitness To Parent, The Burden Of Proof Is The Adverse Parties… We Would Tell Them To Present You Evidence That Exists And That We Can Not Produce Adverse Evidence That Does Not Currently Exist (AN Evaluation Of Our Parenting Skills)!

3) If The Court Were To Threaten Our Parental Rights Without Clear And Convincing Evidence, We Would Appeal And Likely Win – See:

In Parham v. J.R. et al 442 U.S. 584 (1979) in toto, inclusive of cited cases, and specifically with regard to its findings that:

The U.S. Supreme Court declared the ‘best interest of the child’ resides in the fit parent – not in the state:

“To deny a parental right requires constitutional due process that proves he’s either unfit or a clear danger to his children – proven with ‘clear and convincing’ evidence.”

SANTOSKY V. KRAMER, 455,745 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court and its findings that:

“emphasized: to restrict a fundamental right of a p“Our constitutional system long ago rejected any notion that a child is a “the mere creature of the State” and, on the contrary, asserted that parents generally have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare [their children] for additional obligations.”

LEGAL DISCLAIMER FOR ALL LEGAL REFERENCES CONTAINED HEREIN:

Do not rely on anything contained on this site as legal advise it is:

expressly not legal advise, nor are we lawyers

FURTHER TAKE NOTE:

We’ve consulted with a man that the state of New Jersey has deemed to be legally incompetent after

1) he prevailed in court on several occasions (Derek Syphrett)…

2) And then the state declared him competent….

So clearly we are just a bunch of confused citizens….We’re not lawyers or judges!

WE ARE JUST: confused journalists: writing for a free internet publication, reciting the facts there-of!

IN NEW JERSEY COURTS

THE TRUTH IS STRANGER THAN FICTION!

LETTER TO NJ SUPREME COURT: RIGHT TO FILE CHALLENGE TO A VOID COURT ORDER

Standard

LETTER TO THE SUPREME COURT HERE

COPY OF VOID COURT ORDERS BY

ASSIGNMENT JUDGE RONALD E. BOOKBINDER HERE

(Denying Attorney, Witness of Fact, and Father right to appear for own trial)

COPY OF JUDGE JIMENEZ FRAUDULENT COURT ORDERS & TRANSCRIPTS HERE

(Fruadulently claim a Public Defender was Assigned, No Fact Finding for Order, Warrantless Arrest, No legal notice of “First Appearance” given to Defendant)

COPY OF PROOFS THAT JUDGE MARY C. JACOBSON ISSUED TRANSFER ORDERS WITHOUT FACT FINDING IN ORDERS, AND DESPITE THE FACT SHE WAS A PARTICIPANT IN THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION RELATED TO ONE OF THE CASES

HERE:

2014-08-18 – SHERIFFS INVESTIGATIVE REPORT – Redacted

2013-11-22 – ORDER – CASE 13-2502 – Jacobson – Jimenez Recusa

l 2014-01-17 ORDER TRANSFER CIVIL DOCKETS

JOHN TOMASELLO ISSUES FALSE FACTS IN OPINION

JOHN TOMASELLO ISSUES FINAL ORDER FOR CUSTODY BASED ON STATEMENTS ATTRIBUTED TO PEOPLE WHO WERE NEVER WITNESSES NOR APPEARED IN COURT

HERE:

2014-10-07 – FV-03-1154-14 Derek Writ Coram Nobis (SEE EXHIBITS)

REVENGE OF THE DAD: WRIT OF MANDAMUS & HABEAS CORPUS FOR RETURN OF MY CHILDREN

Standard

PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES,

(PURSUANT: NEW JERSEY STATE CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE I, et seq.

PURSUANT: BINDIN COMMON-LAW inclusive of Haines v. Kerner (1972)

WRIT OF MANDAMUS, IN LIEU OF WRIT, LEGAL BRIEF

WRIT OF HAEBEAS CORPUS, FOR BENJAMIN AND VANESSA SYPHRETT

(Submitted in Forma Pauperis, by Indigent Citizen, (See Proofs in Dockets: FV-03-1154-14 & FO-11-131-13)

SEE FULL PETITION TO SUPREME COURT, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURT, COURT CLERK

WITH EXHIBITS DETAILING SOME OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS HERE:

2014-10-12 Petition – Writs – Legal Brief

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCE

(Pursuant: New Jersey State Constitution Article I, Par. 18;

Pursuant: Haines v. Kerner U.S. Supreme Court 1972; &

Binding Common-Law within this Jurisdiction)

Derek C. Syphrett, Esq. 10/10/2014

In the following capacities, and as the following legal persons:

Attorney; Citizen of New Jersey; Citizen of the United States of America; The Sovereign Power / Authority, in parte et in lege, et in lege; Permanently Disabled Person; Real Party of Interest; Defendant Pro Se; The Public, in parte; Naturalis Homo In Carne; Amicas Curiae; Witness-of-fact; Parent & Legal Guardian of Benjamin & Vanessa Syphrett (Citizens of Connecticut, and victims of Parental Kidnapping in 2010, in putative court ordered custody of Margaret Wallace, by putative court order of the State of New Jersey);

252 Fountayne Ln,

Lawrence Township, NJ 08648

VIA U.S. MAIL & FACSIMILE BY THIRD PARTY PERSONS

M. Smith, Hon. Chief Justice Rabner, Hon. Justice Albin, and all Employees of the New Jersey Courts with: any connection to my legal affairs: praeterita vel praesentia

Supreme Court of New Jersey

25 Market St, Trenton, NJ 08625

RE:

THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE NEW JERSEY COURTS;

WRITTEN REQUEST FOR ACCOMODATION PURSUANT THE FEDERAL AMERICAN’S WITH DISABILITIES ACT (A.D.A. / ADA)
THE ADDRESSEES OF THIS LETTER WILL BE IN VERY BIG LEGAL TROUBLE IF I DO NOT GET ANSWERS TO THESE QUESTIONS AND DEMANDS IN 7-DAYS. THE GIG IS UP. MY PATIENCE HAS EXPIRED. NO PERSON ON EARTH WOULD PUT UP WITH WHAT I HAVE IN SUCH A CIVIL AND LAWFUL MANNER, AND YET I REMAIN CIVIL & LAWFUL AND I SHALL REMAIN SO AT ALL TIMES. YOU MAY BE SUBJECTED TO DIRECT OR COLLATERAL PROSECUTION IF THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IS NOT BOTH “CURED” AND “PURGED” REMEDIALLY

Dear Michelle M. Smith, Hon. Chief Justice Rabner, Hon. Justice Albin, Judge Glenn Grant, J.A.D. And all officers of the Unified Courts of New Jersey, Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct:

I have sent this letter to you in all of your “official capacities”, whether they be administrative or judicial in nature, or otherwise.

In my aforementioned legal capacities, and on behalf of the multitude of legal persons I both represent, and, in fact, am: I must at this point propound upon my (in parte) Court the following concerns and requests pursuant the interest of Justice, Court Rule 1:33, New Jersey State Constitution, 1947, Constitution for the United States of America, 1787 (inclusive of subsequent Amendments), the American Common-law / constitutionally operable portions of the ius civilli, within this states jurisidiction, and pursuant the A.D.A.:

PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES,

PURSUANT: NEW JERSEY STATE CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE I, et seq.

&

WRIT OF MANDAMUS, IN LIEU OF WRIT, LEGAL BRIEF

WRIT OF HAEBEAS CORPUS, FOR BENJAMIN AND VANESSA SYPHRETT

I demand by operation of the Common-Law of this Jurisdiction, and pursuant timely and properly filed Writ of Coram Nobis, in Lieu of Writ, and papers submitted by right pursuant Court Rule 4:50, that my legal matters in Vincinage 3 be immediately relocated to an appropriate court.
1. TO BE CLEAR: I demand (pursuant my prior and present written notices (in toto) which detail violations of “THE LAW” with relation to my legal affairs that the Administrative Office of the Courts consider Intervening in a material and impactful manner, in the interest of Justice; AND in support of my constitutionally protected rights; AND the RULES-OF-LAW (eg. Court Rules in toto)) THE COURT RESPOND IN WRITING TO ADDRESS THE VIOLATIONS OF COURT OFFICERS JUDGE PEDRO JIMENEZ, JUDGE FITZPATRICK, JUDGE JACOBSON, JUDGE BOOKBINDER, JOHN TOMASELLO, ETC.
2. TO BE CLEAR: BY COURT RULE (1:33 and others) IT IS NOT THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCTS SOLE RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THE PROPER ADMINISTRATION OF THE COURTS. IT IS IN FACT THAT OF CHIEF JUSTICE STUART RABNER, in his administrative capacity, and it is further the delegated responsibility of the Director of The Courts, and all Assignment Judges.
3. AS SUCH: I DEMAND THE PROPER ADMINISTRATION OF THE COURTS WITH REGARD TO MY LEGAL AFFAIRS AND THE APPARENT NULL & VOID COURT ORDERS CURRENTLY PROPOUNDED UPON MY PERSON(S) AND MY PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE-PROCESS UNDER-THE-LAW, AND WITHOUT FOUNDATION IN THE LAW.
I DEMAND THE COURT TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE CASE FILES IN FM-03-790-14, FV-03-1154-14, FV-03-1162-14, AND PROSECUTOR’S CASE # 13-2502, in toto, and inclusive of the Transcripts for the Same.
I DEMAND THE COURT EXPLAIN UPON WHAT LAWFUL AUTHORITY I WAS ARRESTED ON 8/19/2013, AND THEN ARRAIGNED BY JUDGE PEDRO JIMENEZ WITHOUT ANY LEGAL NOTICE TO MY ATTORNEY (MYSELF), OR MYSELF (DEFENDANT), PRIOR TO BEING HANDCUFFED AND BROUGHT BEFORE A JUDGE ON 8/19/2013 1-DAY PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED “FIRST APPEARANCE”, WHICH WAS SERVED UPON ME ON 8/18/2013.
1. FURTHER I DEMAND TO KNOW: ON WHAT BASIS IN FACT MY WARRANT OF 8/18/2013 WAS AMENDED, AS THE COURT, PROSECUTOR, AND SHERIFF’S OFFICE HAVE TO DATE NOT SUPPLIED ANY ANSWER TO MY WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THIS INFORMATION.
  1. In Fact in June of 2014: The Sheriff’s Office Falsely Claimed that they had no record of my 8/19/2013” arrest in response to the O.P.R.A. Request of John Paff. THIS WAS AN ACT OF MAIL FRAUD AND A LIE.
  2. THE AFOREMENTIONED LIES / FALSE STATEMENTS WERE: ONLY CORRECTED AFTER A COPY OF THE ARREST RECORD WAS SENT TO THE MERCER COUNTY OFFICE OF COUNSEL!!!
2. FURTHER I DEMAND TO KNOW: ON WHAT LAWFUL AUTHORITY I WAS ARRESTED WITHIN THE SUPERIOR COURT WHILE SERVING AS AN ATTORNEY-IN-FACT, FOR A CASE PENDING BEFORE THE COURT AT THAT TIME AND/OR
3. I DEMAND TO KNOW ON WHAT AUTHORITY WAS I ARRESTED ON 8/19/2013, AFTER LAWFULLY POSTING BAIL ON 8/18/2013 IN PROSECUTORS CASE #13-2502
I DEMAND THE COURT TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS FROM (dsyphrett@gmail.com) TO EMPLOYEES OF THE COURT AND EMPLOYEES OF THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT FROM (1/2013 to 10/12/2014):
1. The Court Acknowledge written receipt, via “mail”, of my objection to the Probation Departments enforcement of a “Null & Void” child support order, and the courts / probatins failure to schedule an Administrative Hearing on the disputed facts of the matter.
2. The court acknowledge my pre-adjudication requests in both FM-03-790-14 and FV-03-1154-14 (via an un-scheduled, Immediate Appeal requesting counsel be assigned): that I repeatedly requested counsel as a indigent, and as a result of my documented disabilities. THE COURT FAILED TO HEAR MY PROPERLY PLACED MOTIONS, AND/OR FAILED TO EVEN ISSUE SUMMONS FOR THE 3/1/2014 IMMEDIATE APPEAL (this was a violation of State Statutory-due-process, the will of the People, and contrary to the New Jersey State Legislature’s Authority, to demand the court provide immediate appeals as of right to a D.V. Defendant)!!!
3. The Court Acknowledge that the proceedings in FM-03-790-14, were in fact and/or law in violation of the rights of the real parties of interest (Derek Syphrett, Benjamin Syphrett, and Vanessa Syphrett), in the manners described in the past correspondence with The Court, A.C.J.C. Sent via various forms of “mail” to the Court, and contained in the motion papers of Mr. Syphrett. This includes:
  1. THESE FACTS, EVIDENCE, AND TRANSCRIPTS CONFIRMING THAT: THE COURT PROHIBITING A WITNESS OF FACT, THE DEFENDANT, AND THE DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY (Derek Syphrett) FROM APPEARING AT TRIAL IN FM-03-790-14, FV-03-1162-14, AND FV-03-1154-14, on 2/18/2014 and 2/19/2014, where the court in some cases adjudicated the matters ex-parte, as a result of prohibiting one litigant from appearing at all, via court orders of 2/6/2014, and 2/19/2014.THE AFOREMENTIONED BASIS IN FACTS AND EVIDENCE (AND THE OTHER EVIDENCE I HAVE SENT TO THE COURT PREVIOUSLY) REPRESENTS: CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THIS COURT HAS PARTICIPATED IN IUNLAWFUL ACTS, THAT ARE REPUGNANT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THIS STATE, AND AS A RESULT AFFORDS THE COURT NO OFFICE, TO ISSUE FINAL ORDERS IN ANY OF THESE MATTERS BY OPERATION OF THE COMMON-LAW.
  2. LEGAL FOUNDATIONS SUPPORTING THIS DEMAND AND/OR LEGAL ARGUMENT INCLUDE: “LAW OF THE VOIDS” AND/OR “DOCTRINE OF RECIPROCALS”
    1. Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co.,254 U.S. 348, 41 S.Ct. 116 (1920)
    Excerpts from “The Valley Supreme Court:
    
    “Courts are constituted by authority and they cannot go beyond that power delegated to them. If they act beyond that authority, and certainly in contravention of it, their judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void, and this even prior to reversal.”
    1. Boyd v. United 116 U.S. 616 : Justice Bradley said: “It is the duty of the courts to be watchful for the Constitutional Rights of the Citizens…”
    2. Gomillion v. Lightfoot 364 U.S. 155:“Constitutional Rights would be of little value if they could be indirectly denied.”
    3. Norton v. Shelby County 118 U.S. 425:An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.
    4. In Marbury v. Madison, U.S. Supreme Court: Chief Justice John Marshall stated:“the very purpose of the written constitution is to ensure that the government officials, including Judges, do not depart from the documents fundamental principles”.
    5. RE: THE DOCTRINE OF RECIPROCALS: This Court has attempted to order Mr. Syphrett to pay child support for children that the State placed in the Physical & Legal Custody of Margaret J. Wallace, THIS VIOLATES “THE DOCTRINE OF RECIPROCALS”, AND EXCLUSIVE OF THE VIOLATIONS OF MR. SYPHRETT’S RIGHTS AT TRIAL, THIS COURT HAS FURTHER COMPOUNDED ITS ERRORS BY ASSERTING THAT MR. SYPHRETT IS OBLIGATED TO PAY CHILD-SUPPORT FOR CHILDREN THAT THE COURT HAS PUTATIVELY ASSERTED ARE NOT HIS CHILDREN UNDER-THE-LAW, OR WITHIN THE PHYSICAL / NATURAL WORLD. FURTHER:FURTHER: THIS UNIFIED COURT HAS ASSERTED THAT MR. SYPHRETT IS OBLIGATED TO SUPPORT THE SAME CHILDREN THAT THE COURT ASSERTS ARE NO LONGER HIS TO RAISE, REAR, OR PARENT IN THE MANNER HE SEES FIT AS A PARENT.
      FURTHER:
      
      Mr. Syphrett Cited “RE: The Matter of Baby “M”” during the trial proceedins in FM-03-790-14, for judicial notice. He explicitly demanded the court to acknowledge that it would be waiving the right to set an so-called “child-support” obligation if the court prohibited Mr. Syphrett from having legal and physical custody of his children. The court was effectively executing a quasi-adoption, and as such Mr. Syphrett would have no obligation to pay “support” to any party.

AS SUCH: THIS UNIFIED COURT IS WITHOUT ANY LAWFUL RIGHT TO DEMAND OR PURPORT THAT MR. SYPHRETT HAS ANY “SUPPORT” OBLIGATION TO MS. WALLACE, OR THE CHILDREN, AS IT VIOLATES THE DOCTRIN OF RECIPROCALS

I DEMAND THIS COURT ENFORCE MY LEGAL RIGHTS IN ALL OF MY AFOREMENTIONED CAPACITIES, OR ACCEPT LIABILITY FOR ITS FAILURE TO DO SO, AND THAT ALL COURT OFFICERS WHO HAVE FAILED TO ENFORCE MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS EITHER TAKE IMMEDIATE REMEDIAL ACTION, OR ALSO AVAIL THEMSELVES TO PROSECUTION IN THE APPROPRIATE COURTS OF LAW.

I DEMAND A WRITTEN RESPONSE, INCLUSIVE OF WAIVORS OF JUDICIAL IMMUNITY FOR THOSE OFFICERS WHO VOLUNTARILY VIOLATED MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN ANY OF THE AFOREMENTIONED CASES, FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUCH WAIVOR, WILL BE DEEMED AS A THREAT AGAINST MY PERSON, AND PROOF, THAT SUCH OFFICERS INTEND TO FURTHE HARM ME AT A FUTURE DATE

I DEMAND THIS COURT PROVIDE ME THE NAME AND ALL OTHER APPROPRIATE INFORMATION PURSUANT THE ADA WITH REGARD TO THE PERSON RESPONSIBILE FOR ADMINISTERING THE “AMERICAN’S WITH DISABILITIES ACT” AT THE HUGHES JUSTICE COMPLEX, THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, WITHIN THE APPELLATE DIVISION, AND WITHIN THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS. I DEMAND THIS INFORMATION AS A PERMANENTLY DISABLED PERSON, PURSUANT THE RECORDS CONFIRMING THE SAME PREVIOUSLY SENT TO THE UNIFIED COURTS OF NEW JERSEY.

I DEMAND PROBATION CEASE / STAY ANY ENFORCEMENT OF MY SO-CALLED “CHILD SUPPORT” COURT ORDERS UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT AND THE COURT PROVIDE ME A FOUNDATION IN THE LAW FOR THE SAME, THAT IS NOT CLEARLY THE RESULT OF NULL & VOID COURT ORDERS, WHICH WERE NULL & VOID AB INITIO (for the reasons cited herein, and for the reasons previously submitted to the Court and/or probation in writing).

I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO FURTHER PROSECUTE THIS MATTER AND ALL RELATED PERSONS, IN THE EVENT THAT MY GRIEVANCES ARE NOT FULLY ADDRESSED BY THE ADDRESSED PERSONS AND GOVERNMENTAL BODIES.

I DEMAND RESTORATION OF MY PARENTAL RIGHTS, MY CUSTODY RIGHTS, AND MY LEGAL RIGHTS WITH REGARD TO MY CHILDREN BENJAMIN AND VANESSA SYPHRETT. I DEMAND THIS SUA SPONTE, AND IMMEDIATELY

BASIS IN FACT INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE FACT THAT THE TRIAL JUDGE ORDERED A CHANGE OF CUSTODY BASED ON FACTS, EVIDENCE, AND TESTIMONY NEVER PUT PROPERLY BEFORE THE COURT (1. Therapists in Connecticut, who did not appear in court, submit reports, or affadavits AND 2. witnesses whom the court did not allow the Defendant to Cross-Examine, the Defendant’s wife! AND 3. Witnesses the court refused to allow the Defendant to produce, his children!)
BASIS IN FACTS AND THE LAW:
1. THE DEFENDANT WAS NEVER PROVEN TO BE AN UNFIT PERSON TO A CLEAR AND CONVINCING STANDARD OF EVIDENCE. THE DEFENDANT WAS DENIED DUE-PROCESS AT TRIAL.
2. THE DEFENDANT WAS DENIED THE RIGHT TO APPEAR AT HIS OWN TRIAL, AS WAS HIS ATTORNEY, AND HIS WITNESS-OF-FACT. THIS IS EXTRINSIC FRAUD! (See the current edition of Black’s Law Dictionary for “Extrinsic Fraud”)

iii. AS A PRESUMED FIT PARENT, WITH ONLY POSITIVE PARENTING TIME SUPERVISOR REPORTS THE DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO RELIEF PURSUANT:

– In Parham v. J.R. et al 442 U.S. 584 (1979) in toto, inclusive of cited cases, and specifically with regard to its findings that:

The Supreme Court declared the ‘best interest of the child’ resides in the fit parent – not in the state: “Our constitutional system long ago rejected any notion that a child is a “the mere creature of the State” and, on the contrary, asserted that parents generally “have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare [their children] for additional obligations.”

– Santosky v. Kramer 455 U.S. 745 (1982) in toto and specifically with regard to its legal findings that:

To deny a parental right requires constitutional due process that proves he’s either unfit or a clear danger to his children – proven with ‘clear and convincing’ evidence. As such, Santosky v. Kramer 455 U.S. 745 (1982) emphasized to restrict a fundamental right of a parent to any extent, requires a showing of clear and convincing evidence that serious harm will come to the child.

I ADVISE THAT: I WILL ONLY CONSENT TO THE PERMENANT SEALING OF MY FILES IN THE EVENT:THAT MY CUSTODY IS RESTORED AND THIS COURT WAIVE ALL FUTURE JURISDICTION OR RIGHTS TO INTERFERE IN THE RIGHTS OF MY PARENTAL RIGHTS SO LONG AS MY CHILDREN REMAIN CITIZENS OF A FOREIGN STATE

CONCLUSION:

YOU WILL OBEY THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY /PARTY,

MEANING: ME (in parte / in toto)

I DEMAND THAT THIS PETITION BE CONSTRUED LIBERALLY PURSUANT BINDING OPERATION OF THE COMMON-LAW, AS CITED IN HAINES V. KERNER, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT (1972), AND ITS BINDNG PROGENCY WITHIN THIS JURISDICTION.

FURTHER: I submit that to the extent that this document IN FACT DOES NOT ADDRESS ALL OF MY LONG-DATED CONCERNS PREVIOUSLY PUT BEFORE THIS BODY, I RESERVE AND DEMAND THE RIGHT TO BE FULLY HEARD, PLENARY PROCEEDINGS, AND ORAL ARGUMENTS… BECAUSE THIS COURT WILL NOT PROPOUND A SILENT INJUSTICE UPON ONE OF ITS CITIZENS. AS SUCH I REMIND THIS COURT THAT AS A CITIZEN I AM IN FACT A MEMBER OF THE BODY THAT POCESSES THE SOVEREIGN-AUTHORITYOF THIS COURT,

I AM IN FACT AND LAW: A CONSTITUTIONAL CREATION MYSELF AS A “CITIZEN”.

VERY TRULY:

Derek C. Syphrett, Esq.

Attorney-in-Fact

Citizen of New Jersey

Citizen of the United States of America

Permanently Disabled Person, pursuant the ADA

Witnesss-of-Fact

Real-Party-of-Interest

The Sovereign-Power, in parte / in toto, in iure civili, et in carne

Naturalis Homo in Carne

Legally Competent Person, Pursuant:the findings and Precedential Law in Kyle v. Verona Green Acres, and its progency in New Jersey Courts

The Putative Pro Se

SEE THE TRANSCRIPTS OF JUDGE PEDRO JIMENEZ

ACTING AS JUDGE, WITNESS-OF-FACT, PROSECUTOR,

IN JUST ONE EPISODE OF THIS UNMITIGATED DISASTER

HERE

THIS WAS AN UNLAWFUL KIDNAPPING OF AN ATTORNEY,

APPEARING IN COURT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE!

JUDGE PEDRO JIMENEZ ACTED BEYOND ALL AUTHORITY AND MAY NOW BE

ARRESTED AND PROSECUTED CIVILLY AND CRIMINALLY FOR THIS!

(Gadsen Flag Circa 1775)

THE ABOVE PROVIDED TO:

REMIND NEW JERSEY PUBLIC OFFICIALS THAT:

SOME OF US HAVE NOT FORGOTTEN THE REASONS

THIS STATE IS “SELF-GOVERNED”

Judge Peter Warshaw – THIS ISN’T DOMESTIC VIOLENCE!!!

Standard

ABOVE:

Altered / Fraudulent Evidence Submitted by:

Jennifer Millner & Eliana Baer of Fox Rothschild

to support Frivolous Domestic Violence Charges

===============================

ABOUT THE ABOVE TEXT:

===============================

TEXT IS AN ACT OF FRAUD (ALTERED EVIDENCE). SEE CLEARLY VISIBLE WHITEOUT STRIPS (IN THE IMAGE ABOVE) COVERING FRIENDLY TEXTS FROM THE FATHER.

ALTERED EVIDENCE ISN’T ADMISSIBLE IN A COURT OF LAW OR EQUITY, BUT JUDGE WARSHAW ALLOWED MY WIFE MEG WALLACE TO USE THIS TEXT IN ITS ALTERED FORM TO JUSTIFY A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CHARGE AGAINST ME.

THIS TEXT MESSAGE WAS USED TO JUSTIFY A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CHARGE AGAINST A FATHER (DEREK SYPHRETT) AND DENY THE FATHER REGULAR VISITATION WITH HIS CHILDREN FOR OVER A YEAR.

THIS TEXT IS EVIDENCE THAT THE FAMILY COURTS ARE CORRUPT, AND SEPARATE PARENTS FROM CHILDREN SIMPLY TO CREATE HIGHER CHILD SUPPORT ORDERS BY DESTROYING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LOVING PARENTS AND CHILDREN.

THIS TEXT WAS SENT TO 20 PEOPLE ON THE DAY MY TRIAL WAS ADJOURNED, MY WIFE WAS INADVERTENTLY ON THE DISTRIBUTION LIST.

THERE WAS NO RESTRAINING ORDER IN PLACE THE DAY THIS TEXT WAS SENT – SO IT MAKES NO SENSE THAT I WAS ACCUSED OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OR PROHIBITED FROM SEEING MY CHILDREN

THE STORY OF THE ABUSE OF

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ALLEGATIONS

It has become public knowledge in the legal community that Domestic Violence Restraining Orders are often used during divorce in order for a Plaintiff (usually the wife) to get a temporary custody order and increased child support.

I experienced this twice during my divorce proceedings with Margaret J. Wallace (Meg Wallace). She lied twice to get Temporary Restraining Orders (TRO).

Each time Jennifer Millner / Eliana Baer of Fox Rothschild attempted to coerce me into giving my wife money or more custody (resulting in more money) in exchange for dropping what were fraudulent, frivolous Domestic Violence Complaints.

MY CASE AND

JUDGE WARSHAW, jUDGE DEBELLO, & JUDGE FITZPATRICK

in this article / post about how ridiculous Domestic Violence TRO’s have become in New Jersey I’ve provided an example of one of the most ridiculous Domestic Violence TRO’s ever issued in any state (its mine).

The purported crime I was alleged to be guilty of was sending my wife a text message that stated:

“Yay I got my trial Adjoured until march”

SOURCE DOCUMENT: 2012-12-04 – ALTERED EVIDENCE USED FOR TRO

NOW ASK YOURSELF THIS:

QUESTION: is the above Text Message in anyway an act of DOMESTIC VIOLENCE?

ANSWER: NO … There is no threat. The statement was factual.

2. QUESTION: Is this text a threat to my children’s Wellbeing that SHOULD justify the IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF MY PARENTING TIME?

ANSWER: NO, THIS TEXT HAD NO BEARING ON MY PARENTING TIME OR MY RELATIONSHIP WITH MY CHILDREN.

YET REMARKABLY JUDGE PETER WARSHAW ORDERED THAT I CEASE ALL CONTACT WITH MY CHILDREN AND THAT MY PARENTAL RIGHTS EFFECTIVELY BE TEMPORARILY TERMINATED WITH REGARD TO CONTACT TO MY CHILDREN.

THIS WAS AN OUTRAGEOUS INJUSTICE AND WAS COMPLETELY DISRESPECTFUL TO MY CHILDREN’S DEVELOPMENTAL NEEDS AND MY OWN PARENTAL RIGHTS.

SEE THE TEXT SUBMITTED TO THE COURT HERE:

EVIDENCE:

Here are links to ALTERED TEXT MESSAGES THAT MY WIFE’S LAWYERS (JENNIFER MILLNER / ELIANA BAER) SUBMITTED TO THE COURT AS EVIDENCE THAT I COMMITTED HARASSMENT / DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

THE DOCUMENTS HERE ARE OUTRAGEOUS:

2012-12-04 – ALTERED EVIDENCE USED FOR DV CHARGE – FOX ROTHSCHILD LAWYERS UNETHICAL

NOTICE: THE White out covering the majority of this purported text message that allegedly put my wife Meg Wallace in fear for her life.

The text contains a single statement “Yay I got my trial adjourned” … YET SOMEHOW JUDGE PETER WARSHAW CLAIMED THAT THIS WAS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND HE SAID I SHOULD HAVE NO PARENTING TIME AS A RESULT!!!

MY 3 AND 5 YEAR OLD CHILDREN WERE SHOCKED AND HEARTBROKEN AFTER OUR REGULAR TELEPHONE CALLS WERE INTERRUPTED WITH OUT WARNING

2. LETTER TO COURT EXPLAINING MY CONCERNS ABOUT MY WIFE’S HISTORY OF LYING TO THE COURT ABOUT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE:

SOURCE DOCUMENT: 2012-12-06 LTR About History of FALSE RESTRAINING ORDERS ALLEGED PERJURY OF MY WIFE

CONCLUSION:

i Intend to update this post at a later date with the evidence that I informed the court of my wife and her lawyers fraudulent submission of a ALTERED text message which removed the friendly texts I sent my wife (like “Happy Birthday, Truly… on my wife’s birthday).

But for the sake of publishing this draft version of information I’ll conclude by saying:

My FRO trial was not provided in 10 days as NJ Statutes require, instead the Judge delayed my FRO trial so that I went over a year without seeing my children and without being able to calm my children or let them know that I truly loved them.

This sort of activity by the court and unethical lawyers like Jennifer Millner and Eliana Baer should not be allowed to interfere with the loving relationship that a father like me has with his two children.

Needless to say Meg Wallace (Margaret Wallace) who is a nurse at Lawerence Memorial Hospital should never have attempted to file a fraudulent TRO against an honest man, because her actions and the actions of women like her actually diminish that protections available to real victims of domestic violence and such actions make a mockery of the courts.

In the end I actually believe the Domestic Violence laws should be completely scrapped, and men accused of domestic violence should face criminal courts not “family courts”, because the criminal process is more fair and less rife with abuse. additionally women do not need special laws to protect them, women are perfectly capable of filing criminal complaints and providing evidence and testimony to juries.

There is no need for special DV laws that allow women to abuse the process to hurt men and children who have done nothing wrong.

Lastly I would EMPHASIZE THAT MY WIFE’S DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CHARGES WERE DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS – WITHOUT MERIT OVER 425 DAYS LATER WHEN MY CASE WAS TRANSFERRED AWAY FROM JUDGES IN MERCER COUNTY.

Former Client of Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick Describes Unethical Practice of Law

Standard

Introduction:

Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick was a Mercer county lawyer. As a lawyer she failed her clients, damaged children and destroyed fathers for profit, according to a former client.

Below is a description of her conduct by a former client (from West Windsor Plainsboro Today):

“My experience with Catherine Fitzpatrick was slightly different. She charged me less than $20,000 for my divorce but the damage she caused my children who were just 4 and 5 at the time of separation was beyond repair.

When I separated a few years ago, I had some issues with my ex-husband but nothing that should have caused me to file for divorce. He used little alcohol but was never drunk, no drugs and was never physically abusive to me. He got angry sometimes, but so did I, mostly due to the pressures of every day life.

Now I know better.

He is a good man who has always been very good to my children. What Fitzpatrick wrote in the divorce papers made him appear to be the No. 1 danger to my kids and to society. She wrote asking that he only receives supervised visitations, undergo psychological testing, anger management, AA, etc. and counseled me against allowing him to see or even talk to his own children for over 3 months “just to have an upper psychological edge” and bring him down to his knees.

Since separation took him by surprise, my ex did not learn how to file a motion to get some visitations until 2 months later. The children had to suffer from not seeing or talking to their father of over 3 months. Later, rather than counsel me to work things out with him on 50/50 custody, she kept insisting that giving him any overnights meant less child support money for many years and made my children to go through 3 grueling child custody assessments.

The children did not seem to be affected few years ago, but later I found out that they were deeply affected and were having self esteem issues from what I foolishly made them believe was abandonment by their father, as well as many problems learning at school and developed psycho-somatic problems like problems with speech and comprehension, emotional outbursts, fear of trusting people and making friends etc. I do not want to get into details but I feel horrible for what I put my ex and my children through for $150/week in child support money. A divorce lawyer should counsel her clients to do what is best for the children not be money hungry and destroy the lives of the children. Fitzpartick is not a good lawyer.”

FORMER CLIENT OF CATHERINE FITZPATRICK

Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick Alleged to Retaliate & File False Criminal Charges

Standard

( ACTUALLY JUDGE FITZPATRICK TRIED TO JAIL ME FOR 5 YEARS… FALSELY…)

================================================

Quick Summary of Facts & Events:

================================================

6/4/2013 Judge Fitzpatrick stripped me of my right to represent myself and appointed both a Guardian Ad Litem & a court appointed Lawyer in violation of:
- my constitutional right to due process (14th Amendment, U.S. Contitution);
- New Jersey Rules of Evidence 703; &
- New Jersey Court Rule 5:3.

She issued a sua sponte order (on the courts own motion) without any evidence or testimony before the court supporting her order. She did not even give me the opportunity to cross-examine or present evidence before issuing the order.

THIS WAS UNLAWFUL AND JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT.

NOTABLY: in 4/2013 I won my last motion before the court and had my wife Margaret J. Wallace (of Gales Ferry CT) found in contempt & my unallocated support enforcement stayed… SO CLEARLY I WAS LEGALLY COMPETENT

NOTABLY: ACCORDING TO SETTLED CASE LAW IN NJ NO COURT COULD DEEM ME LEGALLY INCOMPETENT AFTER SUCCESFFULLY DEMONSTRATING COMPETENCE BEFORE THE COURT IN MY LAST MOTION – SEE KYLE V. VERONA GREEN ACRES JUDGE FITZPATRICK IGNORED THIS BINDING PRECEDENT… THIS TOO WAS UNLAWFUL.

2. 8/14/2013 Judge Fitzparick apparently fabricated criminal charges against me

3. 8/16/2013 Judge Fitzpatrick apparently retaliated by sitting as a judge in my divorce and a now dismissed Domestic Violence case status hearing and order defaults in both cases on 8/16/2013 (see Mercer County Dockets: FV-11-725-13K & FM-11-97-13B)

THIS WAS BOTH UNLAWFUL AND A VIOLATION OF COURT RULE 1:12:-1(g).

IMPORTANT: JUDGE FITZPATRICK’S ORDERS FOR DEFAULTS WERE LATER TREATED AS VOID COURT ORDERS AND VACATED – BECAUSE WHAT SHE DID WAS ILLEGAL.

JUDGE FITZPATRICK DID NOT DISCLOSE HER ATTEMPT TO FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST ME, AND SHE THEN SAT TO HEAR CIVIL CASES DESPITE THE FACT SHE FILED A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST ME AND WAS CONFLICTED

IMPORTANT: I was ordered to appear in civil court on 8/19/2013 for a Default hearing in the DV case FV-11-624-13. When I appeared I learned that my wife and her lawyer were told not to appear in court and I was arrested without new charges being filed, without a warrant, and without probable cause I apparently was kidnapped to shut me up

4. 8/18/2013 I WAS ARRESTED AT MY HOME. I POSTED BAIL AND WAS RELEASED FROM JAIL.

5. 8/19/2013 When I appeared I learned that my wife and her lawyer were told not to appear in court and I was arrested without new charges being filed, without a warrant, and without probable cause I apparently was kidnapped to shut me up.

There was no warrant for my 8/19/2013 Arrest

There was no criminal charges for the 8/19/2013 arrest

No Probable Cause was issued for the 8/19/2013 arrest

No criminal charges were filed for the 8/19/2103 arrest

IT ALL APPEARED TO BE RETALIATION TO SHUT ME UP AND TO KEEP JUDGE FITZPATRICK FROM GETTING IN TROUBLE.

6. In January of 2014 I recorded a phone call with my wife’s lawyer Jennifer Weisberg-Millner of Fox Rothschild. She revealed to me that Judge Fitzpatricks chambers called and told her not to appear in court on the morning 8/19/2013 because I’d been arrested. ODD BECAUSE I HADN’T BEEN ARRESTED IN THE MORNING OF 8/19/2013… ODD BECAUSE THE COURT NEVER CALLED ME TO TELL ME NOT TO COME IN… ODD BECAUSE THESE COMMUNICATIONS WERE EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS BY THE COURT WITH MY WIFE’S LAWYERS!

================================================

OTHER ISSUES FROM EARLY IN MY DIVORCE:

================================================

7.9/2011 My visitations with my children were converted to Supervised visits without a Plenary hearing. When I filed a motion in 9/2011 for Plenary hearing Judge Fitzpatrick refused to schedule the plenary hearing AS REQUIRED BY LAW. SHE ALSO REFUSED TO GIVE ME BACK MY UNSUPERVISED VISITATION.

8. 2011 The Supervised Visitation order was ridiculous it required my wife and me to agree on a supervisor… so my wife just continued to refuse to agree to use any supervisor I wanted to use and refused to pay for supervision. The result was I rarely saw my children for the next 2 years. This was devastating because my children were 2yrs old and 4yrs old at the time and I couldn’t hug, hold, and love them or the next 2 years on a regular basis. IT WAS ABSOLUTELY DEVASTATING AND I NEVER WAS GIVEN DUE PROCESS BY THE COURTS TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE.

9. Domestic Violence Charges by my wife appeared to abused by my wife to separate me from my children. In 2010 my wife filed a DV claim and it was dismissed and she admitted she had falsely stated facts in the complaint. She said I showed up unnannounced despite the fact I had texts from her inviting me to come see the children. Judge Fitzpatrick never held my wife accountable for these apparent lies.

10. In 2012 My wife filed another DV complaint. I was entitled to a hearing in 10 days. Instead Judge Fitzpatrick coordinated with Judge Warshaw and Judge Debello to prohibit a hearing on the DV complaint for over 240 days.

When the case was finally sent to Burlington County the new judge said the Temporary Restraining order Should have never been entered!!

11. Judge Fitzpatrick (or somebody using her user name) created FRAUDULENT COURT DOCUMENTS STATING MY DV CASE WAS 19 DAYS OLD WHEN IT WAS 240 DAYS OLD … THIS OBSCURED THE CASE FROM TRIAL ADMINISTRATORS SO THAT THEY COULD NOT INVESTIGATE WHY MY CASE WAS TAKING SO LONG.

======================================

SEE PROOF HERE:

======================================

12. The DV court order for temporary restraints did not require a psychiatric evalution. but the DV Judges Judge Debello and Judge Fitzpatrick said the would not schedule my hearing unless I went to a psychiatric evaluation (that I consented to go to in the divorce case). I told them I wouldn’t schedule it until the DV matter was handled.

JUDGE FITZPATRICK AND JUDGE DEBELLO UNLAWFULLY REFUSED TO SCHEDULE MY DV CASE WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE TRO AS REQUIRED BY N.J. LAW.

I researched the DV law and found that a DV case can only require a psych. eval if it is ordered as part of the TRO… In my case it was not!!

I told Both Judge Debello and Judge Fitzpatrick regardless of whether I was mentally ill or not it was irrelevant to whether or not I committed a crime, or committed an act of DV… so they needed to schedule the hearing. Additionally I reminded them there was no order for a psych eval in the DV case… THEY IGNORED MY MOTIONS AND LETTERS.

MY DV CASE WASN’T HEARD FOR OVER 425 DAYS, WHEN IT WAS HEARD IT WAS DISMISSED BY THE NEW JUDGE!!!

I WENT OVER A YEAR WITHOUT SEEING MY KIDS BECAUSE THE COURT DENIED ME DUE PROCESS, VIOLATED THE DV LAWS, AND RETALIATED AGAINST ME!

PROOF & EVIDENCE JUDGE FITZPATRICK FRAUDULENTLY MARKED MY CASE AS 19 DAYS OLD WHEN IT WAS 245 DAYS OLD:

DOCUMENT: COURT RECORDS SHOWING CASE WAS FALSELY DATED FACTS

CLICK LINK ABOVE TO SEE DETAILS

==========================================================

ALLEGATIONS AGAINST FOX ROTHSCHILD ATTORNEYS INCLUDE:

==========================================================

Note: My wife was represented by Fox Rothschild. They are professional lawyers, but they litigate with a win at all costs strategy that appears to be ignorant of due-process for their client or adversaries.

Jennifer-Weisberg Millner – a lawyer for over 20 years surely should have known that the submissions by my wife of altered evidence were not admissible in court and that submitting such documents was unethical… but she was complicit with it.

Eliana Baer – Testified to false facts on 12/5/2012 by stating I had sent my wife over 12 emails in a single day.. This was a flat out lie and Elaina Baer never submitted any evidence to substantiate this claim. This was unethical and despite my numerous discovery requests Elaina Baer never submitted 12 emails sent in a single day… she lied.

Jennifer Weisber Millner (Jennifer Millner) should have known that both her clients due-process rights and my due process rights were violated for the over 425 days that the DV case wasn’t scheduled, but she allowed it to happen without ever motioning the court for justice or adherence to the court rules.

Jennifer-Weisberg Millner & Eliana Baer have both been lawyers long enough to know that the sua sponte order Judge Fitzpatrick issued to strip me of my right to represent myself was unlawful and a violation of court rules, yet they were complicit with it.

==========================================================

CONCLUSION

==========================================================

1. In the end all of this will cost my wife and I much more time and money to resolve, which only benefits these slimy lawyers from Fox Rothschild.

2. I reported all of my concerns to the A.C.J.C. for Judicial Misconduct, Judge Glenn Grant – Acting Administrator of the Courts, Judge Mary C. Jacobson, etc… all of them just worked to cover this up, even after my cases were transferred to Burlington County where the retaliation continued under Judge John Tomassello who continued to violate my rights and retaliate for Judge Fitzptrick

3. Judge Tomasello is a total scumbag in my opinion. He actually took ex-parte testimony during the divorce trial and refused to allow me to cross-examine the witnesses he did this with. he also along with Judge Bookbinder prohibited me from appearing in court for my own trial dates on 2/18/2014 and 2/19/2014… THIS WAS ALSO UNLAWFUL AND MEANS MY FINAL ORDER FOR DIVORCE IS NOW VOID AND I HAVE TO GO BACK TO COURT FOR MORE TRIAL DATES JUST TO GET JUSTICE THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BY LAW AND BY COURT RULES.

MOST IMPORTANTLY HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE:

N.J. FAMILY COURT IS CORRUPT & INCOMPETENT – THE JUDGES FEEL THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW AND THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE BEST INTERESTS OF YOUR CHILDREN.

ALL THEY WANT TO DO IS HELP THEIR FRIENDS IN THE LOCAL BAR ASSOCIATION FLEECE YOU FOR ALL YOUR MONEY AND THEN ISSUE COURT ORDERS THAT WILL KEEP YOU DESTITUTE AND UNABLE TO HIRE A LAWYER TO GET JUSTICE.

==============================================

CLEARLY THESE PEOPLE MUST NOT UNDERSTAND THEIR OATHS OF OFFICE

…. PERHAPS THEY ARE CONFUSED???

==============================================

JENNIFER MILLNER / ELAINA BAER / FOX ROTHSCHILD ARE UNTHICAL AND ALLEGED TO STEAL MONEY FROM ESCROW ACCOUNTS

Standard

Lawyer Lying

=================================================================

HERE IS A SHORT SUMMARY OF

UNETHICAL AND/OR APPARENTLY ILLEGAL THINGS JENNIFER MILLNER AND FOX ROTHSCHILD HAVE DONE TO CREATE CONTENTIOUS LITIGATION

=================================================================

FOX ROTHSCHILD DOES NOT APPEAR TO CARE ABOUT ITS CLIENTS OR THEIR CHILDREN, THEY ARE TYPICAL LAWYERS THEY APPEAR TO CARE ONLY ABOUT BILLABLE HOURS

DANA JANQUITTO, ESQ (of Reed Smith)- A FORMER LAW CLERK ALSO GET’S DISHONORABLE MENTION FOR:

HER PARTICIPATION IN ORCHESTRATING A VIOLATION OF A COURT ORDER ISSUED BY THE JUDGE SHE WORKED FOR… SHE ACTUALLY HELPED MY WIFE VIOLATE A COURT ORDER – WITHOUT NOTIFYING THE OPPOSING PARTY OF HER EX-PARTE CONTACT!

SEE DETAILS BELOW:

===========================================================================

MY EXPERIENCE WITH FOX ROTHSCHILDS UNETHICAL OR ILLEGAL TACTICS:

===========================================================================

(this is an edited excerpt from an email sent to Fox Rothschild, my expectation is that they will NEVER directly address their conduct unless I sue them)

To: Eric Sotoloff (Fox Rothschild):

1. Jennifer Millner stole my money from her escrow accountand didn’t provide simultaneous statements – that is theft by deception and the statute of limitations hasn’t run out.

SEE NARRATIVE & SOURCE DOCUMENTS HERE ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB:
https://njcourtcorruption.com/2014/06/22/jennifer-weisberg-millner-jennifer-millner-alleged-to-be-a-thief/

OR SEE ATTACHMENTS WHICH DOCUMENT THE THEFT OF MY MONEY

NOTE: THE LINK TO THE NEWS BLOG ABOVE HAS BEEN READ ON 4 CONTINENTS NOW.

2. Fox Rothschild Conspired with InsiderScore and O’Donnell Newsome to make a false claim on a wages settlement of (gross) $50,000 from InsiderScore. I now have evidence of that. Eric I presume you were involved given that you used to work at O’Donnell Newsome and InsiderScore ironically retained them after Elaina Baer tortuously interferred in my settlement and had it frozen by the court ONLY AFTER YOUR FIRM CONVINCED INSIDERSCORE TO VIOLATE THE CONTRACT

3. Fox Rothschild Retained Dr. Scasta in 2011and didn’t disclose that conflict when Dr. Scasta was appointed to Wallace v. Syphrett in 2013… This was unethical. Shockingly Dr. Scasta didn’t reveal this conflict either, which is simply more evidence that the Mercer County Bar Association and the Courts are corrupt.

4. Jennifer Millner allowed Judge Tomasello to violate the due process rights of my wife, my children, and myself in a manner that will lead us all back to court, and sadly generate more money for Fox Rothschild, unless my wife (copied to this email) finally get’s smart and realizes she can sue you for malpractice and pain and suffering along with me. And yes I call her my wife because the Divorce Decree is Void.

5. Fox Rothschild admitted ALTERED EVIDENCE – TEXTS WITH WHITEOUT ALL OVER THEM AND DELETED MESSAGES TO OBTAIN A TRO, ELAINA BAER THEN FABRICATED TESTIMONY AS A WITNESS ON 12/4/2012…. THIS WILL BE REPORTED AND PUBLISHED. THE PUBLIC NEEDS TO KNOW HOW CORRUPT YOUR FIRM IS SO THAT MORE CHILDREN DON’T GET HURT BY YOUR LITIGATION TACTICS FOR PROFIT. WHAT YOU DO IS NOTHING MORE THAN CHILD TRAFFICKING AND ITS ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING. I HAVE THE SOURCE DOCUMENTS AND THE FAXES YOU SENT TO COURT WITH THE ALTERED EVIDENCE AND THE CONFLICTING NARRATIVE.

6. MY BANKRUPTCY PRE-EMPTS YOUR COLLECTION OF LEGAL FEES: Fox Rothschild Motioned for me to pay my wife’s legal fees even though I had the contingent liability DISCHARED IN BANKRUPTCY IN 2012… THIS WAS UNETHICAL AND RESULTED IN A VOID COURT ORDER FOR ME TO PAY YOU $100,000 OF MY WIFES $400,000 BILL…. YOU IDIOTS… THE FEDERAL COURT HAS ALREADY BARRED YOU FROM COLLECTING – SEE ATTACHED BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE.

7. Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick Admitted on the Record that Jennifer Millner arranged an illegal / violation of a court order for my wife in 2011 when my wife entered my house without consent, and had the sheriff’s department come in as well for illegal search and seizure of marital property! This is now documented online and in the court record! My wife was found in contempt because Jennifer Millner and Judge Fitzpatrick’s Chambers consulted ex-parte to have Sheriff’s Enter my home… this alone is a $100,000 lawsuit (tolled thanks to my late discovery of the Sheriff’s side of the story).

Note: the Unlawful Violation of a Court order resulting in the unauthorized entrance into my home in 2011 was arranged via a call from Jennifer Weisberg-Millner (Jennifer Millner) to Dana Janquitto, Esq (Former Law Clerk to Catherine Fitzpatrick). My presumption is that Dana Janquitto is now working at Reed Smith (www.reedsmith.com) and possibly is a dangerous lawyer because she has demonstrated she works without good ethics.

CLOSING THOUGHTS

MAYBE SOMEDAY JENNIFER MILLNER AND HER ASSOCIATES WILL DECIDE TO MAKE A MORE HONEST LIVING.

IF THEY DO MAYBE IT’LL LOOK SOMETHING LIKE THIS:

ALLEGED CRIMES OF: Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder & Judge Mary C. Jacobson

Quote

Introduction to Alleged Crimes:

Below are emails I sent to Mercer County Prosecutors Office and Burlington County Prosecutor’s Offices along with the evidence included in the links below.

I doubt the Prosecutors will prosecute these cases because they are likely fearful of retaliation from the judges’ and the judges’ political allies.

For that reason I have posted this information in public view so that the public can become aware of the unethical self-dealing within the judiciary.

New Jersey Courts are lawless and the judges do not hold themselves accountable to the United States Constitution or their Judicial Oaths (Judicial Canons).

Below I’ve included a summary and actual emails that I sent to the local prosecutor offices, to supplement my complaint to the FBI and Supreme Court of New Jersey.

=====================================

Quick Take Summary of Alleged Crimes

=====================================

1) Judge Bookbinder issued court orders that violated the United States Constitution in order to obstruct or deny me access to the court. He literally prohibited me from appearing at my own trials to face the accusers in both a criminal case and my divorce… OUTRAGEOUS!

2) Judge Bookbinder consulted / conspired with Judge Jacobson as denoted in hearing transcripts of State v. Syphrett on 12/24/2013 and 1/6/2014.

In other Words:

He consulted with a witness in a criminal case via ex-parte communications and he refused to reveal the nature of these communications. This led to my allegations of Official Misconduct and Witness Tampering.

RESULTING ALLEGED CRIMES:

2C: 30-2 – Official Misconduct in the third degree 12/24/2013, 1/6/2014, 3/24/2014, 2/6/2014, 2/19/2014, 3/10/2014

2C: 30-6 – A pattern of Official Misconduct in the third degree 12/24/2013, 1/6/2014, 3/24/2014, 2/6/2014, 2/19/2014, 3/10/2014, AND UNKOWN DATES WHERE EX-PARTE ORDERS FOR ESCORT AND RESTRAINTS OF MY ACCESS TO OMBUDSMAN WERE ISSUED VERBALLY OR VIA EMAIL.

2C: 28-5 – Witness Tampering in the third degree on 12/24/2013, 1/6/2014, and about 3/24/2014

=======================================

ACTUAL EMAILS DETAILING CONCERNS & ALLEGED CRIMES 6/27/2014

=======================================

Subject: Formal REQUEST FOR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION: Specific Charges

Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 16:48:24 -0400
From: Derek Syphrett <dsyphrett@gmail.com>
To: prosecutor@co.burlington.nj.us, rbernardi@co.burlington.nj.us, “glenn.grant@judiciary.state.nj.us” <glenn.grant@judiciary.state.nj.us>, ronald.bookbinder@judiciary.state.nj.us, sharyn.sherman@judiciary.state.nj.us, jeanne.covert@judiciary.state.nj.us, jbocchini@mercercounty.org, mnardelli@mercercounty.org, John Call <John.Call@judiciary.state.nj.us>, Divorce – John Rooney <john@rooneyphillylawyer.com>

The record of State v. Syphrett will show that on 12/24/2013 and 1/6/2014 both Judge Covert and Judge Bookbinder referenced Judge Bookbinder’s ex-parte consultation with Mary C. Jacobson a presumed witness in State v. Syphrett.

I have audio transcripts of both of these hearings.

ALLEGED WITNESS TAMPERING:

Further on about 3/24/2014 Judge Bookbinder insisted he might continue to consult Mary C. Jacobson despite my lawyer and my objection to the same during a status conference call held on about that date.

SEE PROOF THAT JUDGE JACOBSON WAS A WITNESS IN STATE V. SYPHRETT HERE:

2014-08-18 – SHERIFFS INVESTIGATIVE REPORT – Redacted

ALLEGED OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT:

Further with regard to Judge Bookbinder’s void court orders of 2/6/2014, 2/19/2014, and 3/10/2014 I believe official Misconduct occurred as those court orders actually prohibited me from appearing in court for my own trials as a self-represented litigant and a real party of interest. Further Judge Bookbinder issued other court orders restraining me from meeting with the Ombudsman and with regard to having me harrassed by sheriff’s escorts via sua sponte orders off the record, which were only put on the record when I discovered such orders had been issued via conversations with Chip Thompson and Sgt. Potts.

SEE ATTACHED VOID COURT ORDERS HERE:

VOID COURT ORDERS BOOKBINDER

These Court Orders Violate the U.S. Constitution in numerous ways, including prohibiting a Defendant from appearing in court at his own trials!

These Court orders are also contrary to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Haines v. Kerner which allow for self-represented litigants to operate contrary to court rules.

I believe criminal charges under the following N.J. Statutes can and should be investigated and pursued in the interest of justice, especially considering the gravity of the allegations and the issues being related to public officials and the public interest in a lawful judiciary and the rule of law:

Alleged Criminal Charges:

2C: 30-2 – Official Misconduct in the third degree 12/24/2013, 1/6/2014, 3/24/2014, 2/6/2014, 2/19/2014, 3/10/2014

2C: 30-6 – A pattern of Official Misconduct in the third degree 12/24/2013, 1/6/2014, 3/24/2014, 2/6/2014, 2/19/2014, 3/10/2014, AND UNKOWN DATES WHERE EX-PARTE ORDERS FOR ESCORT AND RESTRAINTS OF MY ACCESS TO OMBUDSMAN WERE ISSUED VERBALLY OR VIA EMAIL.

2C: 28-5 – Witness Tampering in the third degree on 12/24/2013, 1/6/2014, and about 3/24/2014

=======================================

EMAIL TO BURLINGTON COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE:

=======================================

On 6/27/2014 4:19 PM, Derek Syphrett wrote:
Burlington County Prosecutor’s Office / Robert Bernardi:

Please accept this email as a formal request for investigation of Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder with regard to his role in State v. Syphrett. He admitted to consulting a witness in State v. Syphrett (see attached investigative report) with regard to the handling of State v. Syphrett.

Such actions by Judge Bookbinder appear to be contrary to the Supreme Court Precedent set in the Matter of Stephen Perskie (a former superior court judge), they were also definitely violations of the Judicial Canons.

Please note I had requested Judge Bookbinder to avoid embarassing the court and to uphold the integrity of the court by transferring my legal matters from his court, however, he chose of his own free-will to continue engaging in activities that demeaned the integrity of the court and appear to be contrary to the pillars of our justice system. Sometimes people just can’t handle the privilege and power that comes with their jobs, sadly I believe this is such a case.

SEE BOTH THE ATTACHED INVESTIGATIVE REPORT AND THE INLINE ATTACHMENT BELOW DETAILING MY CONCERNS AND EVIDENCE:

REPORT SHOWING JUDGE JACOBSON WAS A WITNESS IN THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION: 2014-08-18 – SHERIFFS INVESTIGATIVE REPORT – Redacted

INLINE ATTACHMENT BELOW:
> Hi Kathleen,
>
> (To: Judge Grant & Joanne Dietrich please forward this email and my statements below as a verified complaint to the ACJC – I expect action with regard to paragraphs 3 & 4).
>
> 1. Your response to my O.P.R.A. request did not include a couple emails (listed below as inline attachments) can you explain this discrepancy.
>
> 2. My recollection is that both my lawyer and Michael Nardelli (who is btw a great guy, despite being a Dolphins fan… Go Patriots!) were thoroughly confused and irritated by Judge Bookbinder’s refusal to handle the case in a coherent manner and the following email exchange occurred:
>
> 3. My recollection is that the email exchange (ATTACHED BELOW) occurred after a fairly lengthy status hearing with Judge Bookbinder where both my lawyer and I asked him to transfer the case given JUDGE BOOKBINDER’S consultation with Mary C. Jacobson (a witness in the underlying criminal investigation for State v. Syphrett) about State v. Syphrett and the associated bail conditions and restraints.
>
> 4. The concerns my lawyer and I had related to the fact that Judge Bookbinder apparently violated of Judicial Canon 2 an 3 (ex-parte communication and bestowing and creating the appearance of special influence). It also may have been witness tampering (a felony). Additionally my lawyer and I felt that Judge Bookbinder’s civil restraints violated the United States Constitution and the Judicial Canons.

Subject:	Re: Order
Date:	Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:08:27 -0400
From:	John F. Rooney, V <john@rooneyphillylawyer.com>
To:	Nardelli, Michael <mnardelli@mercercounty.org>, Derek Syph <dsyphrett@gmail.com>

Mike:

I can’t consent to the form, or anything, regarding the case remaining in Burlington County. That being said, you can send it to Judge Bookbinder as it is written, and if Judge Bookbinder sees fit, he can sign it, but i cannot consent to it. Thank you for your understanding.

John
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Nardelli, Michael <mnardelli@mercercounty.org> wrote:

I used “primary witness”. Let me know if this looks ok.

From: johnfrooneyesq@gmail.com [mailto:johnfrooneyesq@gmail.com] On Behalf Of John F. Rooney, V
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 4:58 PM
To: Nardelli, Michael
Subject: Re: Order

sorry to be a pain in the ass. Can we change “victim” to complaining witness?

John

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Nardelli, Michael <mnardelli@mercercounty.org> wrote:

I removed “entry”.

From: John F. Rooney [mailto:john@rooneyphillylawyer.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 3:51 PM
To: Nardelli, Michael
Subject: Re: Order

not sure. I would just ask that you take out that I consent to the “entry” of the order. I am ok with the “form” of the Order, not its content, or entry. Thanks.

John

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Nardelli, Michael <mnardelli@mercercounty.org> wrote:

I have no idea if this is even remotely close to what he wants.

Michael A. Nardelli

Assistant Prosecutor

Mercer County Prosecutor’s Office

209 South Broad St.

PO Box 8068

Trenton, NJ 08650

609-989-6360

NOT FOR DISCOVERY NOT FOR DISCOVERY NOT FOR DISCOVERY

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. Access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender so that we can arrange for proper delivery. Please delete the message from your inbox.

Thank you, Prosecutor Joseph L. Bocchini, Jr.

This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com
—

Law Offices of John F. Rooney V
2401 Pennsylvania Avenue – Suite 1C-41
Philadelphia Pa, 19130

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

Jennifer Weisberg-Millner (Jennifer Millner) of Fox Rothschild – Alleged to be a thief

Standard

Jennifer Weisberg-Millner(Jennifer Millner) of Fox Rothschild, LLP

November 19, 2010 A court order was issued moving my post-marital wages into the escrow account of Jennifer Weisberg-Millner. She was ordered distribute only $1,280.00 per month for an unallocated support order.

INSTEAD SHE VIOLATED THE ORDER AND FAILED TO PROVIDE ME WITH STATEMENTS FOR HER UNAUTHORIZED TAKING OF MY MONEY, UNTIL I MOTIONED JUDGE CATHERINE FITZPATRICK.

WHEN I ASKED FOR THE UNAUTHORIZED DISTRIBUTIONS TO BE PLACED BACK INTO MY ACCOUNT, JENNIFER MILLNER REFUSED, MY WIFE REFUSED, AND THEY CONTINUED TO EFFECTIVELY STEAL MY MONEY.

I CONTACTED THE POLICE, THEY TOLD ME THAT THEFT BY DECEPTION WAS NOT A CRIME… THAT’S NOT TRUE… IT IS:

I alleged that this was theft by deception, because she did not initially provide me with statements for the distributions of my money, which were larger than what was ordered by the court – I reported this to the Lawrenceville Police, who did nothing).

PROOF JENNIFER MILLNER DISTRIBUTED MORE MONEY THAN SHE WAS ALLOWED TO BY LAW:

Note: Despite sloppy / potentially criminal legal work like this Ms. Millner sits on the Mercer County Bar Association Ethics committee.

Note: When I contacted Ms. Millner and demanded she reimburse the money she took in violation of the court order, she initially refused, and stated my wife likewise refused to return the money taken unlawfully.

I certify the forgoing statements are true.

Derek Syphrett

Victim of the Family Court and Unethical Lawyers in New Jersey

Kidnapping of Derek Syphrett & Mercer County Cover-up

Standard

==========================

TAKE NOTICE:

ALL NEW ARTICLES APPEAR BELOW

THIS PERMANENT POST

(Visit Archives for Monthly viewing)

==========================

TAKE NOTICE:

ALL NEW ARTICLES APPEAR BELOW THIS PERMANENT POST

==========================

Introduction to Story:

I was kidnapped by Mercer County Sheriff’s Office on 8/19/2013.

The Sheriff’s Office purported my kidnapping to be an “arrest” BUT:

There was No Warrant, No Probable Cause, No Criminal Charges

When I requested Records and an explanation of my arrest, the Sheriff’s Office Denied they had arrested me.

Ultimately I spent 4 Months in Jail or Hospital and never had a trial

When I was released the Sheriff’s Office Sent a Response to an O.P.R.A. request and THEY SAY HAVE NO RECORD OF MY “ARREST”… OF COURSE NOT, BECAUSE IT WAS A KIDNAPPING.

Ironically Below are links to the Official response from Mercer County’s lawyers stating that they have NO ARREST RECORD. The next link is MY COPY OF A MERCER COUNTY ARREST RECORD FOR 8/19/2013!

DOCUMENT & PROOF – DENIAL OF “ARREST: OPRA Response 6/12/2014

DOCUMENT & PROOF – ARREST RECORD – THE DAY I WAS FAKE ARRESTED

Below I have included the back story including a story of apparent retaliation by a apparently vindictive Family Court Judge (Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick) and all the the facts supporting this claim.

BELOW THE LINKS TO SOURCE DOCUMENTS ARE INCLUDED AND LINKS TO DOCUMENTS THAT SHOW MERCER COUNTY IS COVERING UP AND REFUSING TO RESPOND TO O.P.R.A. REQUESTS.

This post has been published simply to provide proofs of my story to inform the public about the Corruption in Mercer County New Jersey and the ongoing cover-up related to my kidnapping by Mercer County Sheriff’s Officers.

===================================================

Quick Summary – The Punchline:

===================================================

I was arrested 8/18/2013 on a lawfully issued warrant.

The charges for the 8/18/2013 arrest were apparently fabricated by my divorce judge Catherine M. Fitzpatrick, THESE ORIGINAL CHARGES WERE DISMISSED 8 MONTHS LATER (SEE DISMISSAL BELOW).

DOCUMENT & PROOF : COURT ORDER DISMISSED CRIMINAL CASE (2014-04-17 )

(The case was, oddly, dismissed on Prosecutor’s ex-parte motion, they never notified me – the opposing counsel – of the motion as required by law. If they had I’d have countered insisting a trial be heard due to the underlying fraudulent charges)

I posted bail 8/18/2013 and was released from jail

I went to my family court hearing on 8/19/2013 – somehow I was PURPORTEDLY placed under arrest again… EXCEPT THERE WAS:

NO WARRANT;
NO PROBABLE CAUSE;
NO CHARGES WERE EVER FILED;
NO LEGAL BASIS JUSTIFY THIS 8/19/2013 “PURPORTED ARREST”.

PROOF OF PURPORTED ARREST:

DOCUMENT: Prisoner Receipts and Bail Recognizance – 8/19/2013

Cover-up Begins: SHERIFF’S OFFICE LATER DENIES ANY PURPORTED ARREST 8/19/2013.

NOW SEE THE LETTER FROM SHERIFF’S OFFICE WHICH SHOCKINGLY STATES THERE IS “NO ARREST RECORD”

SEE THE ACTUAL LETTER (AN O.P.R.A. RESPONSE) VIA THE LINK BELOW:

DOCUMENT: 2014-06-12 – Mercer County OPRA Response

SO THEN ABSENT AN ARREST RECORD:

THIS WAS NOTHING LESS THAN A KIDNAPPING UNDER FALSE PRETENSES
WHAT I’VE JUST DESCRIBED IS A CRIME

=============================================

THE SET-UP:

=============================================

There is a long back-story about a family court Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick, who tried to violate my constitutional rights and retaliate against me for exposing her for unlawful acts in my divorce…. For now I’ll spare you those details.

What is important to tell you and show you is the fact that Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick apparently fabricated criminal charges against me on 8/14/2013. These Charges were later Dismissed pre-trial for reasons never fully explained by the Mercer County Prosecutor Joseph Bocchini.

SO WITHOUT FURTHER DELAY – HERE IS THE SET-UP:

Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick made allegations / criminal complaint against me on 8/14/2013.

She sat on the bench in my divorce and another matter on 8/16/2013 without me present, but with my court appointed lawyer Stuart Weiner present for my divorce trial. Judge Fitzpatrick never disclosed her conflict of interest (the criminal complaint against me) then she apparently retaliated against me and attempted to issue an order for default in my divorce on 8/16/2013.

DOCUMENT: 2013-08-16 – FM-97-11K – Default Orders

FYI: THIS ORDER FOR DEFAULT WAS NEVER ENFORCED, THE JUDGE WAS RECUSED AND THE ORDER WAS TREATED AS VOID BY JUDGE TOMASELLO.

She ordered I appear in court on 8/19/2013 for a default hearing. This was all very illegal, because there was reason given for the default hearing.

8/18/2013 I was arrested at my home on what appeared to be a lawfully issued warrant for albeit a FRAUDULENT CRIMINAL COMPLAINT BY JUDGE CATHERINE M. FITZPATRICK. The warrant was issued by a friend and colleague of Judge Fitzpatrick, Judge Pedro Jimenez.

The warrant was very odd. My bail was set 150% higher than the state maximum for a third degree terroristic threat.

My bail was set all cash for a third degree charge, even though it is highly unusual and against state practice to have an “ALL CASH BAIL” for a third degree charge.

RegardlesS I POSTED BAIL 8/18/2013

DOCUMENT: 2013-08-18 Bail Recognizance Receipt

RELEASED FROM JAIL AFTER LAWFULLY POSTING BAIL ON 8/18/2013.

…. LITTLE DID I REALIZE I WOULD BE KIDNAPPED THE NEXT DAY!!!

I ARRIVED AT THE FAMILY COURT ON 8/19/2013 WITH MY FRIEND

IMMEDIATELY WE REALIZED SOMETHING WAS STRANGE WHEN MY RELATIVES AND FRIENDS ON THE 4TH FLOOR TOLD US:

My wife and her lawyer were not even in court! I found out later this was because Judge Fitzpatrick’s chambers told THEM (only) not to appear on 8/19/2013. The judge unethically had ex-parte communications (one-party discussions about the case).

WHEN I ARREIVED AT THE COURT ON 8/19/2013:

I was told I was under arrest by sheriff’s officers.

I ASKED THEM WHY I WAS UNDER ARREST – THEY SAID:

“WE’LL TELL YOU LATER”…. THEY NEVER DID.

… EVER SINCE MERCER COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE (SHERIFF JACK KEMLER, UNDER-SHERIFF PEDRO MEDINA, AND THEIR MERCER COUNTY OFFICE OF COUNSEL HAVE ATTEMPTED TO OBSTRUCT MY ATTEMPTS TO GET AN EXPLANTION – SEE DOCUMENTS BELOW.

After I was kidnapped by Sheriff’s Officers 8/19/2013. I was handcuffed processed and then sent across town to the criminal courthouse for a first appearance for the 8/18/2013 criminal charges…. this was unlawful as well… because the 8/18/2013 warrant stated that my first appearance was scheduled for 8/20/2013 NOT 8/19/2013… In otherwords I had no legal notice for this “first appearance” / arraignment hearing and no opportunity to have a lawyer

JUDGE PEDRO JIMENEZ – a friend of Judge Fitzpatrick’s presided over my arraignment and immediately amended my arrest warrant without explaining why he was amending it. He presided over the case as a conflicted Judge… 3 months later he was recused from the case after I wrote a letter to the Administrative director of the courts and the Federal Civil Rights Office (DOJ).

During the first appearance hearing Judge Jimenez acted unlawfully and amended my warrant to require me to be sent back to jail, despite the fact the prosecutors office wasn’t present in court. Judge Jimenez acted as the prosecutor and acted without any new evidence being put before the court.

Note: I had posted bail lawfully on 8/18/2013… so there was no justification for amending my bail on 8/19/2013, since I hadn’t violated my bail conditions or committed any new crime!!! Before I could even speak my warrant was “amended” sua sponte on the courts own motion, without any justification given until after I objected. Even then the justification for amending my bail was simply my behavior in court! THAT MAKES NO SENSE… BECAUSE THE AMENDMENT WAS MADE BEFORE I COULD ADDRESS THE COURT – MY BEHAVIOR COULD NOT HAVE BEEN THE REASON FOR AMENDING THE BAIL CONDITIONS.

SEE TRANSCRIPTS HERE:

TRANSCRIPTS OF UNLAWFUL ARRAIGNMENT 2013-08-19 Case #13-2502

JUDGE JIMENEZ VIOLATED HIS OATH AND APPEARS TO HAVE COMMITTED A CRIME BY DENYING ME MY LIBERTY WITHOUT DUE-PROCESS UNDER THE LAW

=============================================

THE FULL STORY & THE EVIDENCE

CLICK THE UNDERLINED DOCUMENTS IN THIS SECTION

TO SEE SOURCE DOCUMENTS

=============================================

(I am only disclosing what I’ve shared with Mercer County I have more evidence than this).

DOCUMENT: 2014-08-18 ARREST WARRANT (REDACTED) ISSUED BY JUDGE PEDRO JIMENEZ

This warrant stated that my first appearance in CRIMINAL COURT would be 8/20/2013… As you’ll see I never had an 8/20/2013 first appearance, instead I was kidnapped by Sheriff’s Officers and denied access to the phone or my lawyer before I was put in front of a criminal court judge on 8/19/2013, without legal notice, or opportunity to have my lawyer present… THIS WAS ILLEGAL.

I lawfully posted a $50,000 ALL CASH bail on 8/18/2013.

Here is my Bail Recognizance Receipt – Showing I lawfully posted bail on 8/18/2013. See that evidence here:

DOCUMENT: 2013-08-18 Bail Recognizance Receipt

8/19/2013 I was ordered to appear in court before Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick. See that court order below.

DOCUMENT: 2013-08-16 – FM-97-11K – ORDER – Default Orders

NOTE: To be clear the appearance before Judge Fitzpatrick was for a Ridiculous Domestic Violence charge by my wife, IT WAS IN NO WAY RELATED TO THE CRIMINAL CHARGES OR MY ARREST ON 8/18/2013.

NOTE: The Domestic Violence case was also a creation of Judge Fitzpatrick and her cronies at court. The case was based on a ridiculous charge by my Wife Margaret Wallace who claimed she was put in fear for her wellbeing because she received that said “Yay I got my Tral Adjourned”. My wife ginned up the charge and it was always ridiculous. Judge Fitzpatrick let the DV charges linger for over 245 days without giving me a hearing. The copies of the text message my wife used for this complaint were covered in white-out – she even whited out the message that said “Happy Birthday Truly” on 12/1/2012… 4 days later my wife claimed i was a domestic violence batterer… I realize now what an idiot I was for even trying to be nice to my wife.

NOTE: The Domestic Violence Charges against me were later dismissed by a different trial judge who said “THIS RESTRAINING ORDER SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN ISSUED”.

Proof I was arrested on 8/19/2013 – See the prisoner receipt that indicates I was arrested around 1:35pm on 8/19/2013. See Prisoner Receipt here:

DOCUMENT: Prisoner Receipts and Bail Recognizance – 8/19/2013
SO CLEARLY I WAS “ARRESTED” RIGHT???

WELL NOT ACCORDING TO THE MERCER COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE.

SEE THE COUNTY’S OFFICIAL RESPONSE – NO RECORD OF MY ARREST:

DOCUMENT: 2014-06-12 – Mercer County OPRA Response

At this point Mercer County Sheriff’s Office is stuck in a legal quagmire that they created themselves by unlawfully arresting me without a warrant, probable cause, or any criminal charges.

In N.J. a suspect has to be charged and a probable cause determination must be made within 48 hours of an arrest… Mercer County NEVER CHARGED ME WITH ANYTHING… SO THEY ARE NOW TRYING TO PRETEND THEY NEVER ARRESTED ME ON 8/19/2013

EVIDENCE THE CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST ME WERE FRAUDULENT

CASE DISMISSED (SEE LINK BELOW)

After the second unlawful arrest Judge Pedro Jimenez ignored my requests that he explain why I was being arraigned without the prosecutor, my attorney, or legal notice of the 1st appearance… Instead he sent me to Jail and to a Mental Hospital without making any findings supporting the necessity of either. I stayed in Jail OR Hospital for 4 months.

I WAS FOUND TO BE LEGALLY COMPETENT, BUT I NEVER HAD A TRIAL.

I DID EVERYTHING A CONVICT DOES EXCEPT HAVE A TRIAL OR FACE MY ACCUSER.

DOCUMENT: 2014-04-17 – COURT ORDER DISMISSED CRIMINAL CASE

==================================================

NAMES OF MERCER COUNTY OFFICIALS

WITH KNOWLEDGE OF THE ONGOING COVER-UP:

==================================================

PEOPLE APPEAR TO BE TRYING TO COVER UP THE FACT THAT THEY ARRESTED ME AND HELD ME CAPTIVE FOR HOURS WITHOUT A PHONE CALL.

Here is a list of Mercer County Officials & Judiciary Officials who have apparently ignored my over 25 emails, internal affaires complaints, and criminal complaints related to my own kidnapping:

(The officials listed below have knowledge of my kidnapping and/or received letters and emails and confirmed receipt of the same):

Judge Catherine M. Fitzpatrick (Presiding Judge Family Part, who apparently fabricated a criminal complaint against me that was later dismissed. Fitzpatrick also attempted to strip me of my right to represent myself -she did this illegally too and violated court rule 5:3-3 on 6/4/2013 see here:

About (some) Of Judge Fitzpatricks apparent Misconduct:

DOCUMENT: Illegal Court Order Appointing a lawyer for me without my consent, and without a hearing

Reversal of the above referenced order(after I reported Judge Fitzpatrick to appropriate authorities) – SEE BELOW:

DOCUMENT: COURT ORDER REMOVES ILLEGALLY APPOINTED LAWYER – BUT INCLUDES ILLEGAL ORDER FOR A DEFAULT IN MY DIVORCE – THIS ORDER WAS LATER TREATED AS VOID / VACATED

———————————————–

Judge Mary C. Jacobson (Assignment Judge Mercer County).

ABOUT JUDGE JACOBSON’S ALLEGED MISCONDUCT:

(Marry C. Jacobson actually was involved in the criminal investigation for the charges against me in State v. Syphrett, but she continued to act as a Judge handling the case despite this conflict of interest, she continued to consult on my case despite being conflicted through April of 2014)

About Judge Mary C. Jacobson

ACTED AS BOTH JUDGE & WITNESS IN MY CASE!!

DOCUMENT: SHERIFF’S INVESTIGATIVE REPORT – Redacted (2013-08-18)
- MARY C. JACOBSON UNETHICALLY CONTINUED TO ACT AS A JUDGE IN LATER COURT ORDERS – SHE EVEN CONSULTED ON THE CRIMINAL CASE AGAINST ME. SEE COURT ORDERS HERE:

2013-11-22 – ORDER – CASE 13-2502 – Jacobson – Jimenez Recusal2014-01-17 ORDER TRANSFER CIVIL DOCKETS

JUDGE JACOBSON SHOULD HAVE RECUSED HERSELF!!!

MARY JACOBSON NEVER ONCE ADMITTED SHE HAD A CONFLICT OF INTEREST AFTER 8/15/2013, SHE CONTINUED TO HANDLE MY CASES AND CONSULT WHILE OBSCURING THIS INFORMATION FROM ALL PARTIES.

JUDGE JACOBSON ACTED AS JUDGE AND WITNESS IN MY CASE!!!

———————————————–

Judge Pedro Jimenez (Superior Court Judge who held a 1st Appearance without legal notice and violated my constitutional rights)

ABOUT JUDGE JIMENEZ’S ALLEGED OUTRAGEOUS MISCONDUCT:

In Judge Pedro Jimenez fraudulently issues a court order stating I was represented by a public Defender. I wasn’t. See the 8/19/2013 Transcripts & the 8/20/2013 court order below:

DOCUMENT: TRANSCRIPT OF STATE V. SYPHRETT – THE ILLEGAL FIRST APPEARANCE (8/19/2013) – MY RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED, NO MIRANDA, NO PROSECUTOR, NO REASONS FOR HIGH BAIL

DOCUMENT: ILLEGAL & FRAUDULENT COURT ORDER – 8/20/2013

THIS COURT ORDER CONTAINS FALSE INFORMATION – NO PUBLIC DEFENDER HAD BEEN ASSIGNED TO MY CASE IN

JUDGE PEDRO JIMENEZ APPEARS TO HAVE COMMITTED FRAUD – HIS ORDER STATES I HAD A PUBLIC DEFENDER, BUT RECORDS SHOW THAT I NEVER DID (In 2013).

THE TRANSCRIPTS SHOW I REFUSED A PUBLIC DEFENDER!

———————————————–

Det. Paul Toth (Sheriff’s Office)

Sheriff Officer who witnessed my arrest & a cop who was found to have violated an inmates rights in 2012 in State v. Funchess (N.J. Appellate Court).

===================================================

THE REST OF THE SUPPORTING CAST OF DISHONEST/ INCOMPETENT GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES / OFFICIALS:

===================================================

Chief Justice Stuart Rabner (Received Emails & Letters)

Judge Glenn Grant, Acting Director of Courts (Received Emails & Letters)

Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder (Assignment Judge Burlington)
- SEE THE OTHER BLOG POSTS ABOUT JUDGE BOOKBINDER’S UNLAWFUL COURT ORDERS AND COMPLICITY IN COVERING UP THE KIDNAPPING – HE EVEN CONSULTED WITNESSES EX-PARTE ABOUT THE CRIMINAL CASE BEFORE IT WAS DISMISSED.
- JUDGE BOOKBINDER ACTUALLY ISSUED A COURT ORDER BANNING ME FROM ATTENDING MY OWN DIVORCE TRIAL!!!SEE THOSE COURT ORDERS HERE: DOCUMENT: BOOKBINDER – UNLAWFUL COURT ORDERS

I CAN’T RESPECT A JUDGE LIKE BOOKBINDER WHO BREAKS THE LAW AND VIOLATES SUPREME COURT DECISIONS LIKE HAINES V. KERNER (he claimed he wasn’t familiar with it)!

David Merritt, Esq. (Law Clerk to Judge Bookbinder)

NOTES:

David Merritt was initially very courteous when handling my phone calls and he seemed to empathize with the unfair treatment that I was receiving from Judge Bookbinder, which included COURT ORDERS THAT PROHIBITED ME FROM APPEARING IN COURT FOR MY OWN TRIAL DATES (IN MY DIVORCE AN CHILD CUSTODY ACTINS)… but after I posted this blog and reported Judge Bookbinder to the Supreme Court Judicial Conduct Committee, David told me he was instructed to cease taking my phone calls per court order.

7/11/2014 I recorded a call with David, I reminded David that the court order he was citing was NULL & VOID because it violated my due-process rights (my right to be present at my own trial!)… David is a lawyer and should be fully aware that Judge Bookbinder issued a unlawful court order, and that David was effectively participating in a criminal act by enforcing a VOID COURT ORDER. Instead of being ethical and reporting the court’s abuses and damages to myself and my children, David instead decided to knowingly enforce a void court order and ignore the illegal activity that he was enabling.

David seems like a nice guy, but at the end of the day he decided to participate in misconduct rather than stand up for justice. It seems that the Judges likely bullied him into abiding their misconduct

Sheriff Jack Kemler (Mercer County)

Brian Hughes (Mercer County Chief Executive)

Arthur Sypek (Mercer County Office of Counsel)

Kristina Chubenko (Mercer County Office of Counsel)

Anita Ricketts (Mercer County Office of Counsel)

Paul Adezio (Mercer County Office of Counsel)

Joseph Bocchini (Prosecutor)

Michael Nardelli (Mercer County Prosecutor’s Office)

Warden Charles Ellis

Under-sheriff Pedro Medina

Det. Paul Toth (Mercer County Sheriff’s)

Jennifer Weisberg-Millner – (My wife’s Divorce Lawer. She also violated a court order and distributed my money from her escrow account in violation of a court order, I alleged that this was theft by deceiption, because she did not initially provide me with statements for the distributions of my money, which were larger than what was ordered by the court – I reported this to the Lawrenceville Police, who did nothing).

PROOF JENNIFER MILLNER DISTRIBUTED MORE MONEY THAN SHE WAS ALLOWED TO BY LAW:

2011-05-16 – Jennifer Millner Caught Distributing My Money – violates court order

Sharyn Sherman (Burlington County Court)

Laura Oliver, Esq (Law Clerk to Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick) – Laura helped write void court orders / was complicit with the act on 8/16/2013 when Judge Fitzpatrick should have been recused.

Judge John Call (Presiding Judge of Burlington Count Family Part) – He has allowed Judge Tomasello to continue a pattern of retaliation against me for speaking out and reporting judicial Misconduct.

John Munoz, Esq (Law Clerk to Judge Covert) – NICE KID THOUGH SERIOUSLY.

NOTES:

John was extremely professional during phone calls so I feel bad putting him on the Wall of Shame, because he at least said he understood my frustration and that I was simply fighting to enforce my rights.

Still John watched as my criminal case was dismissed in a fashion that should have raised red flags to any competent lawyer interested in Justice.

Again rather than report the Judges or attempt to help me John instead decided that his career aspirations are more important than my rights or my children’s rights, etc.
John is on this list not because he is a bad guy, but because if I were him I would be ashamed…

===============================================

PLEASE SHARE THIS STORY WITH YOUR FRIENDS, THE MEDIA, AND LAW ENFORCEMENT.

===============================================

THE PUBLIC ATTENTION TO MY KIDNAPPING WILL BE THE ONLY WAY THAT I WILL EVER GET TRUE JUSTICE….

WE CAN NOT ALLOW OUR GOVERNMENT TO BELIEVE THEY CAN KIDNAP US WITHOUT ANY CONSEQUENCES!

MY CURRENT POSITION ON THE MATTER:

==========================

TAKE NOTICE:

ALL NEW ARTICLES APPEAR BELOW THIS PERMANENT POST

==========================

	William O’Malley on THE FAMILY COURT REVOLUTION WI…
	courtreformer4change on THE FAMILY COURT REVOLUTION WI…
	courtreformer4change on THE FAMILY COURT REVOLUTION WI…
	courtreformer4change on THE FAMILY COURT REVOLUTION WI…
	Marc Weber on THE FAMILY COURT REVOLUTION WI…

AFTER AWAKENING FROM

BENIGN ACCEPTANCE OF CORRUPTION

IN NJ:

I REPORTED THE FOLLOWING CRIMES

TO THE FBI

SEE THE LETTER COMPLAINTS HERE:

WHEN A MAN IS STRIPPED OF HIS RIGHTS& CHOICE

…HE WILL MAKE THE ONLY CHOICE AVAILABLE

…HE WILL FIGHT

“I am ashamed to say it, but I am still optimistically (without good cause) hoping for justice and the right to my pursuit of happiness, liberty, and freedom…. with my beloved Children.”

*** BREAKING NEWS ***

UPDATE

DON’T TAKE OUR WORD FOR IT

SEE THE FACTS HERE:

*** OH IT GETS WORSE ****

CHECK THIS OUT:

EXPERT REPORT FROM WALLACE V. SYPHRETT:

READ IT AND WEEP FOR THE CHILDREN BECAUSE

IT IS CERTIFIED TO BE FOR A WOMAN “ROBIN BLOOM”, NOT MR. SYPHRETT!

A DEFENSE AGAINST COURT CORRUPTION

WORTHY OF RESEARCH:

LEGAL DISCLAIMER FOR ALL LEGAL REFERENCES CONTAINED HEREIN:

LETTER TO THE SUPREME COURT HERE

COPY OF VOID COURT ORDERS BY

ASSIGNMENT JUDGE RONALD E. BOOKBINDER HERE

COPY OF JUDGE JIMENEZ FRAUDULENT COURT ORDERS & TRANSCRIPTS HERE

COPY OF PROOFS THAT JUDGE MARY C. JACOBSON ISSUED TRANSFER ORDERS WITHOUT FACT FINDING IN ORDERS, AND DESPITE THE FACT SHE WAS A PARTICIPANT IN THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION RELATED TO ONE OF THE CASES

HERE:

JOHN TOMASELLO ISSUES FALSE FACTS IN OPINION

JOHN TOMASELLO ISSUES FINAL ORDER FOR CUSTODY BASED ON STATEMENTS ATTRIBUTED TO PEOPLE WHO WERE NEVER WITNESSES NOR APPEARED IN COURT

HERE:

SEE FULL PETITION TO SUPREME COURT, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURT, COURT CLERK

WITH EXHIBITS DETAILING SOME OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS HERE:

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCE

(Pursuant: New Jersey State Constitution Article I, Par. 18;

Pursuant: Haines v. Kerner U.S. Supreme Court 1972; &

Binding Common-Law within this Jurisdiction)

PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES,

PURSUANT: NEW JERSEY STATE CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE I, et seq.

&

WRIT OF MANDAMUS, IN LIEU OF WRIT, LEGAL BRIEF

WRIT OF HAEBEAS CORPUS, FOR BENJAMIN AND VANESSA SYPHRETT

I demand by operation of the Common-Law of this Jurisdiction, and pursuant timely and properly filed Writ of Coram Nobis, in Lieu of Writ, and papers submitted by right pursuant Court Rule 4:50, that my legal matters in Vincinage 3 be immediately relocated to an appropriate court.

I DEMAND THE COURT TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE CASE FILES IN FM-03-790-14, FV-03-1154-14, FV-03-1162-14, AND PROSECUTOR’S CASE # 13-2502, in toto, and inclusive of the Transcripts for the Same.

I DEMAND THE COURT TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS FROM (dsyphrett@gmail.com) TO EMPLOYEES OF THE COURT AND EMPLOYEES OF THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT FROM (1/2013 to 10/12/2014):

I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO FURTHER PROSECUTE THIS MATTER AND ALL RELATED PERSONS, IN THE EVENT THAT MY GRIEVANCES ARE NOT FULLY ADDRESSED BY THE ADDRESSED PERSONS AND GOVERNMENTAL BODIES.

I DEMAND RESTORATION OF MY PARENTAL RIGHTS, MY CUSTODY RIGHTS, AND MY LEGAL RIGHTS WITH REGARD TO MY CHILDREN BENJAMIN AND VANESSA SYPHRETT. I DEMAND THIS SUA SPONTE, AND IMMEDIATELY

iii. AS A PRESUMED FIT PARENT, WITH ONLY POSITIVE PARENTING TIME SUPERVISOR REPORTS THE DEFENDANT IS ENTITLED TO RELIEF PURSUANT:

– In Parham v. J.R. et al 442 U.S. 584 (1979) in toto, inclusive of cited cases, and specifically with regard to its findings that:

I ADVISE THAT: I WILL ONLY CONSENT TO THE PERMENANT SEALING OF MY FILES IN THE EVENT:THAT MY CUSTODY IS RESTORED AND THIS COURT WAIVE ALL FUTURE JURISDICTION OR RIGHTS TO INTERFERE IN THE RIGHTS OF MY PARENTAL RIGHTS SO LONG AS MY CHILDREN REMAIN CITIZENS OF A FOREIGN STATE

CONCLUSION:

YOU WILL OBEY THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY /PARTY,

MEANING: ME (in parte / in toto)

VERY TRULY:

Derek C. Syphrett, Esq.

Attorney-in-Fact

Citizen of New Jersey

Citizen of the United States of America

Permanently Disabled Person, pursuant the ADA

Witnesss-of-Fact

Real-Party-of-Interest

The Sovereign-Power, in parte / in toto, in iure civili, et in carne

Naturalis Homo in Carne

Legally Competent Person, Pursuant:the findings and Precedential Law in Kyle v. Verona Green Acres, and its progency in New Jersey Courts

The Putative Pro Se

SEE THE TRANSCRIPTS OF JUDGE PEDRO JIMENEZ

ACTING AS JUDGE, WITNESS-OF-FACT, PROSECUTOR,

IN JUST ONE EPISODE OF THIS UNMITIGATED DISASTER

THIS WAS AN UNLAWFUL KIDNAPPING OF AN ATTORNEY,

JUDGE PEDRO JIMENEZ ACTED BEYOND ALL AUTHORITY AND MAY NOW BE

ARRESTED AND PROSECUTED CIVILLY AND CRIMINALLY FOR THIS!

THE ABOVE PROVIDED TO:

REMIND NEW JERSEY PUBLIC OFFICIALS THAT:

SOME OF US HAVE NOT FORGOTTEN THE REASONS

THIS STATE IS “SELF-GOVERNED”

* BREAKING NEWS *

* OH IT GETS WORSE **