Category Archives: Child Custody

Alleged Racketeering: State of New Jersey Judicary

Standard

FBI SEAL

AFTER AWAKENING FROM

BENIGN ACCEPTANCE OF CORRUPTION

IN NJ:

I REPORTED THE FOLLOWING CRIMES

TO THE FBI

SEE THE LETTER COMPLAINTS HERE:

2014-10-22 Fax FBI False Claims Act 2014-10-22 – FAX FBI AOC

2014-10-22 Fax FBI False Claims Act

WHEN A MAN IS STRIPPED OF HIS RIGHTS& CHOICE

…HE WILL MAKE THE ONLY CHOICE AVAILABLE

…HE WILL FIGHT

Many of Mr. Syphrett frends, family, non-prPED ofit contacts, former lawyers, and local law enforcement have asked him , what what he is hoping to accomplish, by advocating for his rights:

He was visibly ashamed and timid in his answer to us:

“I am ashamed to say it, but I am still optimistically (without good cause) hoping for justice and the right to my pursuit of happiness, liberty, and freedom…. with my beloved Children.”

 

“… HONESTLY, I DON’T THINK I HAVE ANY OTHER CHOICE.   MY FATHER TAUGHT ME TO BELIEVE THAT THE EASIEST DECISIONS A MAN CAN MAKE, ARE THE ONES WHEN HE IS GIVEN NO CHOICE, AT ALL”

 

 

 

 

 

THE END FOR AN UNLAWFUL JUDGE – It Looks Like This!

Standard

 

LETTER TO ASSIGNMENT JUDGE RONALD E. BOOKBINDER

SENT AFTER HE ATTEMPTED TO PROHIBIT A DEFENDANT FROM:

APPEARING  IN COURT FOR HIS OWN TRIAL, VIA

UNLAWFUL COURT ORDERS

 

 

SEE THE FAXED LETTER AND FAX RECEIPTS TO ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT (A.C.J.C.)

ADMINISRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS (A.O.C.) AND THE SUPERIOR COURT HERE:

2014-10-10 – LTR to Bookbinder ACJC AOC Goodbye

10/10/2014

Derek C. Syphrett, Esq.

Pro se litigant (Defendant)

252 Fountayne Ln,

Lawrence Township, NJ 08648

VIA U.S. MAIL & FACSIMILE BY THIRD PARTY PERSONS

Family Division Clerk, Suasan Fortino, Judge Bookbinder, John Tomasello, John Call, Judge Covert, Sharyn Sherman, Law Clerks for the Judges named herein.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part (Burlington County)

49 Rancocas Rd

Mount Holly, NJ 08060

RE: Bischoff v. Syphrett

Docket No.: FV-03-1154-14 – DIQUALIFICATION OF TRIAL JUDGES

 

 

Dear Judge Bookbinder:

I am writing the court (not you) to further propound upon the court my demands for justice, pursuant my right to petition my government for redress of grievances, as secured by the People of New Jersey, pursuant the New Jersey State Constitution of 1947, and pursuant my right to communicate in the interests of Justice as an attorney-in-fact (citation: Hawkins v. Harris, 141 N.J. 207 (1995): see courts findings which provide legal foundation supporting my judicial litigation privileges)

I wanted to follow-up on the Status Conference of 10/7/2014, to address your offer to allow me to “Judge Shop” and choose to have the Judge of my choice hear my petitions for redress of grievances (my motions papers generally) with regard to FV-03-1154-14 (only).

Please be advised that I decline your request to participate in any form of “Judge Shopping”, because the offer and the concept itself is offensive and disrespectful to the courts, the litigants, the public trust, and the institution of the Superior Court itself.

 

deviljudge

SEE SOME OF THE UNLAWFUL, NULL & VOID COURT ORDERS HERE:

2014-02-06 and 2014-2-19 and 2014-3-10 COURT ORDERS BOOKBINDER

TO BE CLEAR:

 

My concern about either yourself or John Tomasello attempting to adjudicate my legal matters is borne from my desire to enforce litigant’s rights for the legal person(s) I represent (myself and all other legal persons that I, in fact, am). My concern is that both John Tomasello and yourself have ceased to be Neutral third parties in due to a multitude of actions each of you have voluntarily chosen to engage in, which are clearly contrary to the law, rules-of-law, the state constitution, the federal constitution, my civil rights, and the interests of justice generally. BOTH YOURSELF AND JOHN TOMASELLO ARE ALREADY DISQUALIFIED BY RULE FROM HEARING MY MATTERS PURSUANT THE JUDICIAL CANONS AND MANDATORILY BINDING COMMON-LAW OF THIS JURISDICTION (WHETHER IT BE JUDICIALLY NOTICED OR NOT).

I say the above because the facts, testimony, process, etc that is already before the court 100%, clearly and convincingly support my position that your offending court orders of: 2/6/2014, 2/19/2014, 4/1/2014, 9/12/2014, and others are in fact null and void.

 

 

Court Order Judge

AGAIN: I REQUEST YOU TAKE NOTICE OF THE COMMON-LAW IN TOTO, AND SPECIFICALLY INCLUSIVE OF THE DOCTRINE OF “THE LAW OF THE VOIDS”

    1. The common-law right to attack a court order that is null & void ab initio remains inviolate. As such I assert that the final order in FV-03-1154-14 is NULL & VOID ab inito. Further I assert the orders of Judge Bookbinder dated 2/6/2014, and 2/19/2014 are both Null & Void, and that they represent acts of extrinsic fraud, in that they purport to interfere with the appearance of a witness-of-fact (The Defendant). Such orders may be attacked at any time and are not time barred. They may be legally attacked directly at the trial court and/or collaterally in any court with jurisdiction over the matter.
    1. SEE THE FOLLOWING LEGAL ARGUMENTS AND LEGAL FOUNDATIONS SUPPORTING MY CHALLENGE TO THE FINAL COURT ORDER AS A CHALLENGE DIRECTED AT ANY AND ALL NULL & VOID COURT ORDERS AFFECTING MY LEGAL INTERESTS:
    1. The law is well-settled that a void order or judgment is void even before reversal. Take Judicial Notice of:

      1. Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co.,254 U.S. 348, 41 S.Ct. 116 (1920)

      1. Excerpts from “The Valley Supreme Court:

“Courts are constituted by authority and they cannot go beyond that power delegated to them. If they act beyond that authority, and certainly in contravention of it, their judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void, and this even prior to reversal.”

      1. Boyd v. United 116 U.S. 616 : Justice Bradley said:

“It is the duty of the courts to be watchful for the Constitutional Rights of the Citizens…”

      1. Gomillion v. Lightfoot 364 U.S. 155:

“Constitutional Rights would be of little value if they could be indirectly denied.”

 

      1. Norton v. Shelby County 118 U.S. 425:

“An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”

      1. In Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall stated:

“the very purpose of the written constitution is to ensure that the government officials, including Judges, do not depart from the documents fundamental principles”.

 

0001910cba29056841e3b2e8ca7f16074ab

CONCLUSION:

 

For some not fully transparent, but yet apparent reason: it appears that you and your colleagues have attempted to obstruct justice in an unlawful manner with regard to my legal affairs and my communications with the court and third parties.

THIS WAS A BAD IDEA (MEANING STUPID). I am not the sort of man who should be trifled with by people or persons who have financial assets or lifestyles they wish to maintain at the status quo. I say this not to threaten or scare you, but to emphasize my firm and appropriate position that I will endeavor in any and all civil and lawful manners to hold those who transgress my children, my property, or my rights fully accountable to the law, or at a minimal: I will always endeavor to ensure that those who violate my personal rights or those of my children will be forever discouraged from doing so EVER again, by standing up for my rights in a civil, lawful manner, pursuant the interests of Justice.

TO BE CLEAR: I am not an intolerable jerk, BUT I CAN BE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE… I CAN BE AS BIG OF A JERK AS THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE REQUIRE, AND I HAVE NO PROBLEM TAKING THAT POSITION IF/WHEN IT SERVES THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE.

FURTHER:

The history of people who’ve doubted my legal skill, and/or my professional skill is a very sad story. They do not fair well generally, because ultimately my success leads to their downfall and scrutiny of their peers. I am a very thoughtful person, and so when I speak or interact with the court it is ALWAYS PURPOSEFUL AND DESIGNED TO CREATE JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND AN END RESULT THAT IS IN FACT AND LAW: JUST.

Please also take some solace in the fact that while you have offended me and my family in a very personal manner, my dispute with you is not “personal”. I don’t care about you, or your family, your thoughts, your dreams, your aspirations, your retirement, your occupation etc. It’s just not something I want to concern myself with.

In fact if it were not for your awful conduct as a Judge I believe I could enjoy pleasant conversation with you and a few cocktails at a local eatery. At times you can seem to be a fairly enjoyable personality. However, as a Judge in my matters, you are a distraction, intolerable, and you’ve violated the law. For these reasons alone – I can not abide you handling of my legal affairs a second longer (Please see my writ of coram Nobis for details of my concerns and my legal rights to banish you from this case).

FURTHER: IT HAS NEVER MADE SENSE FOR BOTH JOHN TOMASELLO AND FOR YOU TO CO-DEPENDENTLY SERVE AS TRIERS OF FACT IN FV-03-1154-14… IT OFFENDS ALL MANNER JUDICIAL INDPENDENCE TO HAVE TWO JUDGES ACTIVELY HEARING THE MATTER, WITHOUT BOTH BEING PRESENT TO HEAR PRESENTMENT OF FACTS, TESTIMONY, OR MOTION PAPERS!!!

LASTLY: MY OFFICIAL POSITION IS YOUR COURT ORDERS DO NOT EXIST:

Please be advised that Your Court Orders and those of John Tomasello in FV-03-1154-14, FM-03-790-14, FV-03-1162-14, LITERALLY DO NOT EXIST IN THE CORPUS JURIS (THE BODY OF LAW)

I officially provide you this letter as legal notice that the orders are null and void, the aforementioned court orders: confer no rights; it impose no duties; affords no protection; creates no office; they are in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed … THEY DO NOT EXIST TO ME. FURTHER I WILL NOT CONSENT TO FURTHER HEARINGS BEFORE YOU AS YOU ARE LAWFULLY DISQUALIFIED AS OF 2/6/2014, WHEN YOU ACTED SUA SPONTE AS AN ADVERSE PARTY TO THE DEFENDANT AND THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE BY IMPEDEING THE LEGAL PROCESS UNNECESSARILY AND CONTRARY TO THE LAW AS CITED IN MY WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS.

SO WITH THAT I SAY, HAVE A NICE LIFE AND BEGONE. IF I SEE YOU AGAIN I WILL MOST ASSUREDLY ARREST YOU AND PROSECUTE AS IS MY RIGHT IN NEW JERSEY UNDER THE LAW AND COURT RULE 1:21 et seq.

Kind regards,

Derek Syphrett

Pro se Defendant

P.S. PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS VIA INTEROFFICE MAIL UPON THE UNIFIED COURTS RECEIPT OF THE THIS LETTER.

cc: Judge Glenn Grant

cc: Administraive Office of the Courts (Appropriate Person Overseeing the Compliance with the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act)

cc: Michelle Smith Clerk of the Court

cc: Chief Justice Rabner

cc: Justice Albin

cc: Plaintiff – Kathryn Bischoff (the woman who never refuted or replied to my pleadings that she lied to obtain a FRO, delivered via Court Clerk, pursuant DV Procedural Manual)

 

For more background on the UNLAWFUL ISSUES ENDURED BY THIS MAN IN NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT (FAMILY COURT) READ MR. SYPHRETT WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS HERE.

 

Note a Writ of Coram Nobis is a ancient common-law writ that has origins in Chancery Courts. The New Jersey Family Court is still a Chancery Court, sitting within a Chancery Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey, as such it is totally appropriate to file a Writ of Coram Nobis as of a Common Law right to Demand the correction of court errors of fact. Further Pursuant Court Rule 4:50 it is our well-researched (non-legal opinion) that within 1-year of a FINAL JUDGEMENT,  a motion for NEW TRIAL may be appropriate if a litigants rights were violated through no fault of that litigant, and/or over that litigants objections to the same at trial.

 

SEE THE WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS HERE:

2014-10-07 – FV-03-1154-14 Derek Writ Coram Nobis

IT IS SCATHING AND HILARIOUSLY RUDE TO THE JUDGES WHO LIED!

(IT CONTAINS MANY GRAMMAR ERROS, AND WILL BE AMENDED)

 

 

 

PickPocket and Loose Women

…  AND  …

 

The End Loonie Toons

STATE OF NEW JERSEY COURTS – IGNORE SUPREME COURT RULINGS – UNLAWFULLY INTERFERE IN PARENTING TIME

Standard

Crony King

 

BELOW IS SOME INFORMATION SUBMITTED TO THE WEBSITE BY A PERSON IN NEW JERSEY THAT COMPILED RESEARCH FOR THEIR OWN MOTION TO THE COURT.

ITS A FASCINATING SUMMARY OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS THAT PROHIBIT NEW JERSEY COURTS FROM INTERFERING IN PARENTING TIME DECISIONS OF “FIT PARENTS”.

 

IT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED TO  THIS WEBSITE THAT:

1) Any Court that issues orders inviolate of these Supreme Court Decisions is violating parents Constitutionally Protected “Due Process Rights” and orders issued contrary to these decisions are legally null and void.

2) In practice I suspect the New Jersey Courts and the Bar Association will Continue to Ignore these U.S. Supreme Court Decisions because these decisions get in the way of bilking innocent families out of hundreds of thousands of dollars individually and billions of dollars collectively

 

 

 

 

U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

PROHIBITING “THE STATE” FROM

INTERFERING IN PARENTAL DECISIONS

 

Court Order Judge

THE FOLLOWING TEXT IS CIRCULATING AMONG FAMILY RIGHTS ADVOCATES TODAY

WE HAVE REPUBLISHED IT HERE TO INCREASE THE DISTRIBUTION OF THIS FREE INFORMATION:

 

THE FOLLOWING CITATIONS COME ALSO FROM: HERE

 

    1. In Parham v. J.R. et al 442 U.S. 584 (1979) in toto, inclusive of cited cases, and specifically with regard to its findings that:

      • The Supreme Court declared the ‘best interest of the child’ resides in the fit parent – not in the state: “Our constitutional system long ago rejected any notion that a child is a “the mere creature of the State” and, on the contrary, asserted that parents generally “have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare [their children] for additional obligations.”

    2. Santosky v. Kramer 455 U.S. 745 (1982) in toto and specifically with regard to its legal findings that:

      • To deny a parental right requires constitutional due process that proves he’s either unfit or a clear danger to his children – proven with ‘clear and convincing’ evidence. As such, Santosky v. Kramer 455 U.S. 745 (1982) emphasized to restrict a fundamental right of a parent to any extent, requires a showing of clear and convincing evidence that serious harm will come to the child.

    3. Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 401 (1923) in toto and with regard to the legal fact that the Supreme Court established the following:

      • ‘liberty’ protected by the Due Process Clause includes the right of parents to “establish a home and bring up children” and “to control the education of their own.”

    1. Washington v.Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 719 (1997) in toto, including citations, and with regard to:

      • The right to Due Process includes a substantive component to the process that “provides heightened protection against government interference with certain fundamental rights and liberty interests.” Id., at 720; see also Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292, 301302 (1993).

 

… IF THE CITIZENS CAN NOT GET THE COURT TO ABIDE THE ABOVE LAWS, THEN:

WE SHOULD PREPARE TO DO THE FOLLOWING:

Serfs hoe

Note: We think it is worth filing / citing these cases with our motions now that we have reviewed them.  Why Not?  Can’t make things any worse with regard to our cases. What readers of this cite do with this information is an individual decisions, which we withhold any advisement concerning. This website is does not provide this information as legal advise nor do we have any certified legal expertise express/implied or otherwise.

COURT REFUSES TO ALLOW ME TO SPEAK WITH OMBUDSMAN

Standard

Justice GaggedArticle Published after Receipt from Derek Syphrett:

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

AFTER MOTIONS I FILED WENT MISSING IN A DV CASE I WAS FOUND GUILTY, THE COURT HAS CONTINUED TO RETALIATE AGAINST MY EFFORTS TO SEEK JUSTICE.

PRIOR TO THE DV TRIAL I HAD REQUESTED TO SEE MY FULL FILE AS I SUSPECTED THE PRIOR RECUSED JUDGES WOULD ATTEMPT TO REMOVE MOTIONS FROM THE FILE TO RETALIATE…. IT APPEARS THIS HAPPENED.

  • 6/7/2013 Motion Stamped Received and discussed on the Record 6/13/2013 was removed from the file before the continued 2/19/2014 trial of the DV (after recusal of prior Trial Judge – MISSING FROM CASE FILE FV-11-887-13 (Kathryn Bischoff v. Derek Syphrett)
  • 12/11/2013 Motion filed for dismissal of DV claim due to recusal of trial judge who issued the TRO. (Kathryn Bischoff v. Derek Syphrett). THIS MOTION WAS DELIVERED TO THE COURT IN TRIPLICATE ON 2 SEPARATE DATES – ITS MISSING
  • 1/12/2013 to 2/4/2013 I sent letters to the court requesting to review my case file prior to the scheduled TRIAL in FV-11887-13, RE-DOCKETED IN BURLINGTON COUNTY AS FV-03-1154-14.
  • 2/6/2014 I WAS PUNISHED FOR REQUESTING TO VIEW MY FILE PRE-TRIAL:

Judge Bookbinder issued an unlawful court order: prohibiting me from appearing in court pre-trial or at trial for any reason without EXPRESS PERMISSION FROM A SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE. This was unlawful because it violates my constitutionally protected rights to due process under the 1st Amendment & 14th Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America (1787 Original Jurisdiction)and the New Jersey Constitution which establish the inalienable right to access the court and to be tried consistent with due-process under the law.

  • ADDITIONALLY I FILED A “IMMEDIATE APPEAL” with regard to the DV charge. This is a rarely used statutory right if you are accused of Domestic Violence in New Jersey – see Statute N.J.S.A.: 2C:25-28i.

An immediate appeal is meant to allow the Defendant to challenge a TRO issuance since the TRO was issued without the Defendant present in court to defend himself/herself.

THE COURT IS REQUIRED TO SEND LEGAL NOTICE AFTER SCHEDULING AN IMMEDIATE APPEAL ACCORDING TO THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROCEDURE MANUAL (link to PDF). IN MY CASE THE COURT NEVER SCHEDULED THE IMMEDIATE APPEAL AND JUDGE PETER WARSHAW ERRONEOUSLY DENIED MY IMMEDIATE APPEAL BECAUSE HE SAID I SHOULD HAVE NOTIFIED THE PLAINTIFF AFTER I SERVED THE PLAINTIFF THE IMMEDIATE APPEAL.

I WAS DENIED STATUTORY DUE PROCESS BECAUSE THE COURT NEVER SCHEDULED THE IMMEDIATE APPEAL.

  • RETALIATION CONTINUED WHEN JUDGE JOHN TOMASELLO THREW ME OUT OF COURT AT TRIAL IN BURLINGTON FOR MAKING MY 1ST AND ONLY OBJECTION IN A DIFFERENT CASE… YET HE IS SET TO BE THE TRIAL JUDGE IN THE POST-TRIAL HEARING DESPITE THE FACT HIS BIAS AGAINST ME IS CLEAR AND CONVINCING!

0001910cba29056841e3b2e8ca7f16074ab

NEW POST TRIAL FILINGS FOR RELIEF

LOOK AT HOW RIDICULOUS THIS HAS BECOME:

THIS WEEK: I have filed post trial motions to confront the corrupted court process.

Here are the recent letters to AND from the court:’

Letters and Letter Briefs set to the court to protest the court’s failure to schedule my immediate appeal:

2014-08-07 TO 14 – LTRS – Biased Court

 

LETTER FROM JUDGE BOOKBINDER

2014-08-14 LTR From Judge Bookbinder

LOOK AT ALL THE PEOPLE COPIED TO THIS LETTER !!!

– New Jersey Clerk of the Courts;

– Acting Director of the Courts;

– Chief of Staff for the Courts, etc

IMAGE OF JUDGE BOOKBINDER’S LETTER

2014-08-14 - LTR BOOKBINDER p1

2014-08-14 - LTR BOOKBINDER p2

Whistleblowing Social Worker Faces NJ Retaliation for trying to protect a 12-year old boy… The Boy Committed Suicide (Shame on Judge Mary Margaret McViegh)

Standard

Scales Flaiming

THIS STORY HAS LED TO A FEDERAL LAWSUIT – OF COURSE IT IS UNLIKELY THE FEDERAL COURT WILL DO THE RIGHT THING AND PROTECT THE PUBLIC FROM THE NJ FAMILY COURT.  SEE STORY BELOW:

From: Fourwinds.com (click here for full story)

NYACK, N.Y. , June 8 /PRNewswire/ —

Whistle-blower Jill Jones-Soderman, a New York -based social worker and the executive director of The Foundation for the Child Victims of the Family Courts, says she is being persecuted by New Jersey government officials for her role in revealing explosive information.

According to Jones-Soderman, the problems started when she was subpoenaed by a client inNew Jersey to provide information to the family court. She was working pro-bono as a therapist and forensic advocate on the case. While trying to bring certain facts to the attention of the court, Jones-Soderman claims Judge Mary Margaret McVeigh used her position to suppress evidence and testimony, and eventually to retaliate by placing a false complaint with theNew Jersey licensing board. Now, the licensing board is actively contacting other state boards where Jones-Soderman is licensed and posting what are supposed to be closed hearings on the internet.

The suppression of evidence and the collaboration of the various parties involved in the case may have led to the suicide of a 12-year-old boy, Jones-Soderman explained. The boy “refused to be taken from the protective custody of his mother to be placed with the brutal treatment and intimidation of his father,” she said. The young boy left a note that read “I love you mom.”

“Not one licensing board was in any way interested in the underlying issue of the case: the protection of young children in a wildly rogue, fraudulent and biased court,” Jones-Soderman said, adding that the Attorney General’s office has been harassing her and her clients using tax-payer money ever since. “Patients visited by the attorney general’s office have continued as my patients and have testified on my behalf only to be themselves ridiculed and threatened in court.”

Eventually the attorney general’s office and its licensing boards – through what Jones-Soderman calls deception and intimidation – removed her state license. She says assistant state attorney Susan Berger threatened “that if I did not sign what she wanted me to sign; I would not leave the courtroom in time to pick up my child from school.”

One of the heavy hitters who has come to her defense is Dr. Monty Weinstein, an internationally acclaimed forensic expert and the founder of the Family Therapy Center. “The bureaucrats of the state in my opinion have to be held accountable for this complicitous witch hunt against a fine, brilliant and creative therapist,” he wrote in an affidavit filed with the court. “I hope and pray that I will get to opine.”

Jones-Soderman has filed multiple civil rights law-suits including a racketeering influenced and corrupt organizations complaint in federal court against various state actors. The filings allege that these accusations have made Jones-Soderman vulnerable to extortion. She is also pursuing multi-million dollar suits against some of her former attorneys, who she claims made no attempt to protect her rights.

For more information about the work of Jill Jones-Soderman and her organization, please visit www.notinvain.org,

www.lawisnotjustice.com

SEE MORE ABOUT THIS STORY HERE:

NJ Judge McViegh Under Fire for Alleged Corruption

SOURCE Jill Jones-Soderman

[COMMENT: I was utterly disgusted when I read about this story and the conduct of a Judge potentially leading to the suicide of a 12 year old boy. Worse the woman who was trying to protect the boy ended up being victimized to the point of having her career destroyed.

As a citizen I demand the Judicial Conduct Committee, Chief Justice Rabner, Judge Glenn Grant, and Joanne Dietrich investigate this matter, in the interest of Justice and for the sake of upholding the integrity of the court.

This story deserves to be fully investigated at a minimal]

Former Client of Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick Describes Unethical Practice of Law

Standard

Evil Devil Lawyer

Introduction:

Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick was a Mercer county lawyer. As a lawyer she failed her clients, damaged children and destroyed fathers for profit, according to a former client.

Below is a description of her conduct by a former client (from West Windsor Plainsboro Today):

“My experience with Catherine Fitzpatrick was slightly different. She charged me less than $20,000 for my divorce but the damage she caused my children who were just 4 and 5 at the time of separation was beyond repair.

When I separated a few years ago, I had some issues with my ex-husband but nothing that should have caused me to file for divorce. He used little alcohol but was never drunk, no drugs and was never physically abusive to me. He got angry sometimes, but so did I, mostly due to the pressures of every day life.

Now I know better.

He is a good man who has always been very good to my children. What Fitzpatrick wrote in the divorce papers made him appear to be the No. 1 danger to my kids and to society. She wrote asking that he only receives supervised visitations, undergo psychological testing, anger management, AA, etc. and counseled me against allowing him to see or even talk to his own children for over 3 months “just to have an upper psychological edge” and bring him down to his knees.

Since separation took him by surprise, my ex did not learn how to file a motion to get some visitations until 2 months later. The children had to suffer from not seeing or talking to their father of over 3 months. Later, rather than counsel me to work things out with him on 50/50 custody, she kept insisting that giving him any overnights meant less child support money for many years and made my children to go through 3 grueling child custody assessments.

The children did not seem to be affected few years ago, but later I found out that they were deeply affected and were having self esteem issues from what I foolishly made them believe was abandonment by their father, as well as many problems learning at school and developed psycho-somatic problems like problems with speech and comprehension, emotional outbursts, fear of trusting people and making friends etc. I do not want to get into details but I feel horrible for what I put my ex and my children through for $150/week in child support money. A divorce lawyer should counsel her clients to do what is best for the children not be money hungry and destroy the lives of the children. Fitzpartick is not a good lawyer.”

FORMER CLIENT OF CATHERINE FITZPATRICK

Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick Alleged to Retaliate & File False Criminal Charges

Standard

Baby Judge Stealing Nose

( ACTUALLY JUDGE FITZPATRICK TRIED TO JAIL ME FOR 5 YEARS…  FALSELY…)

================================================

Quick Summary of Facts & Events:

================================================

  • 6/4/2013 Judge Fitzpatrick stripped me of my right to represent myself and appointed both a Guardian Ad Litem & a court appointed Lawyer in violation of:
    • my constitutional right to due process (14th Amendment, U.S. Contitution);
    • New Jersey Rules of Evidence 703; &
    • New Jersey Court Rule 5:3.

She issued a sua sponte order (on the courts own motion) without any evidence or testimony before the court supporting her order. She did not even give me the opportunity to cross-examine or present evidence before issuing the order.

THIS WAS UNLAWFUL AND JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT.

NOTABLY: in 4/2013 I won my last motion before the court and had my wife Margaret J. Wallace (of Gales Ferry CT) found in contempt & my unallocated support enforcement stayed… SO CLEARLY I WAS LEGALLY COMPETENT

NOTABLY: ACCORDING TO SETTLED CASE LAW IN NJ NO COURT COULD DEEM ME LEGALLY INCOMPETENT AFTER SUCCESFFULLY DEMONSTRATING COMPETENCE BEFORE THE COURT IN MY LAST MOTION – SEE KYLE V. VERONA GREEN ACRES   JUDGE FITZPATRICK IGNORED THIS BINDING PRECEDENT… THIS TOO WAS UNLAWFUL.

2. 8/14/2013 Judge Fitzparick apparently fabricated criminal charges against me

3. 8/16/2013 Judge Fitzpatrick apparently retaliated by sitting as a judge in my divorce and a now dismissed Domestic Violence case status hearing and order defaults in both cases on 8/16/2013 (see Mercer County Dockets:  FV-11-725-13K & FM-11-97-13B)

THIS WAS BOTH UNLAWFUL AND A VIOLATION OF COURT RULE 1:12:-1(g).

IMPORTANT: JUDGE FITZPATRICK’S ORDERS FOR DEFAULTS WERE LATER TREATED AS VOID COURT ORDERS AND VACATED – BECAUSE WHAT SHE DID WAS ILLEGAL.

JUDGE FITZPATRICK DID NOT DISCLOSE HER ATTEMPT TO FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST ME, AND SHE THEN SAT TO HEAR CIVIL CASES DESPITE THE FACT SHE FILED A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST ME AND WAS CONFLICTED

IMPORTANT: I was ordered to appear in civil court on 8/19/2013 for a Default hearing in the DV case FV-11-624-13. When I appeared I learned that my wife and her lawyer were told not to appear in court and I was arrested without new charges being filed, without a warrant, and without probable cause I apparently was kidnapped to shut me up

4. 8/18/2013 I WAS ARRESTED AT MY HOME. I POSTED BAIL AND WAS RELEASED FROM JAIL.

5. 8/19/2013 When I appeared I learned that my wife and her lawyer were told not to appear in court and I was arrested without new charges being filed, without a warrant, and without probable cause I apparently was kidnapped to shut me up.

  • There was no warrant for my 8/19/2013 Arrest
  • There was no criminal charges for the 8/19/2013 arrest
  • No Probable Cause was issued for the 8/19/2013 arrest
  • No criminal charges were filed for the 8/19/2103 arrest
  • IT ALL APPEARED TO BE RETALIATION TO SHUT ME UP AND TO KEEP JUDGE FITZPATRICK FROM GETTING IN TROUBLE.

6. In January of 2014 I recorded a phone call with my wife’s lawyer Jennifer Weisberg-Millner of Fox Rothschild. She revealed to me that Judge Fitzpatricks chambers called and told her not to appear in court on the morning  8/19/2013 because I’d been arrested. ODD BECAUSE I HADN’T BEEN ARRESTED IN THE MORNING OF 8/19/2013… ODD BECAUSE THE COURT NEVER CALLED ME TO TELL ME NOT TO COME IN… ODD BECAUSE THESE COMMUNICATIONS WERE EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS BY THE COURT WITH MY WIFE’S LAWYERS!

================================================

OTHER ISSUES FROM EARLY IN MY DIVORCE:

================================================

GAVEL DIVORCE

================================================

7.9/2011 My visitations with my children were converted to Supervised visits without a Plenary hearing. When I filed a motion in 9/2011 for Plenary hearing Judge Fitzpatrick refused to schedule the plenary hearing AS REQUIRED BY LAW. SHE ALSO REFUSED TO GIVE ME BACK MY UNSUPERVISED VISITATION.

8. 2011 The Supervised Visitation order was ridiculous it required my wife and me to agree on a supervisor… so my wife just continued to refuse to agree to use any supervisor I wanted to use and refused to pay for supervision. The result was I rarely saw my children for the next 2 years. This was devastating because my children were 2yrs old and 4yrs old at the time and I couldn’t hug, hold, and love them or the next 2 years on a regular basis. IT WAS ABSOLUTELY DEVASTATING AND I NEVER WAS GIVEN DUE PROCESS BY THE COURTS TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE.

9. Domestic Violence Charges by my wife appeared to abused by my wife to separate me from my children. In 2010 my wife filed a DV claim and it was dismissed and she admitted she had falsely stated facts in the complaint. She said I showed up unnannounced despite the fact I had texts from her inviting me to come see the children. Judge Fitzpatrick never held my wife accountable for these apparent lies.

10. In 2012 My wife filed another DV complaint. I was entitled to a hearing in 10 days. Instead Judge Fitzpatrick coordinated with Judge Warshaw and Judge Debello to prohibit a hearing on the DV complaint for over 240 days.

When the case was finally sent to Burlington County the new judge said the Temporary Restraining order Should have never been entered!!

11. Judge Fitzpatrick (or somebody using her user name) created FRAUDULENT COURT DOCUMENTS STATING MY DV CASE WAS 19 DAYS OLD WHEN IT WAS 240 DAYS OLD … THIS OBSCURED THE CASE FROM TRIAL ADMINISTRATORS SO THAT THEY COULD NOT INVESTIGATE WHY MY CASE WAS TAKING SO LONG.

======================================

SEE PROOF HERE:

======================================

12. The DV court order for temporary restraints did not require a psychiatric evalution. but the DV Judges Judge Debello and Judge Fitzpatrick said the would not schedule my hearing unless I went to a psychiatric evaluation (that I consented to go to in the divorce case). I told them I wouldn’t schedule it until the DV matter was handled.

  • JUDGE FITZPATRICK AND JUDGE DEBELLO UNLAWFULLY REFUSED TO SCHEDULE MY DV CASE WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE TRO AS REQUIRED BY N.J. LAW.
  • I researched the DV law and found that a DV case can only require a psych. eval if it is ordered as part of the TRO… In my case it was not!!
  • I told Both Judge Debello and Judge Fitzpatrick regardless of whether I was mentally ill or not it was irrelevant to whether or not I committed a crime, or committed an act of DV… so they needed to schedule the hearing. Additionally I reminded them there was no order for a psych eval in the DV case… THEY IGNORED MY MOTIONS AND LETTERS.
  • MY DV CASE WASN’T HEARD FOR OVER 425 DAYS, WHEN IT WAS HEARD IT WAS DISMISSED BY THE NEW JUDGE!!!
    I WENT OVER A YEAR WITHOUT SEEING MY KIDS BECAUSE THE COURT DENIED ME DUE PROCESS, VIOLATED THE DV LAWS, AND RETALIATED AGAINST ME!

PROOF & EVIDENCE JUDGE FITZPATRICK FRAUDULENTLY MARKED MY CASE AS 19 DAYS OLD WHEN IT WAS 245 DAYS OLD:

CLICK LINK ABOVE TO SEE DETAILS

==========================================================

ALLEGATIONS AGAINST FOX ROTHSCHILD ATTORNEYS INCLUDE:

==========================================================

Note: My wife was represented by Fox Rothschild. They are professional lawyers, but they litigate with a win at all costs strategy that appears to be ignorant of due-process for their client or adversaries.

Jennifer-Weisberg Millner – a lawyer for over 20 years surely should have known that the submissions by my wife of altered evidence were not admissible in court and that submitting such documents was unethical… but she was complicit with it.

Eliana Baer – Testified to false facts on 12/5/2012 by stating I had sent my wife over 12 emails in a single day.. This was a flat out lie and Elaina Baer never submitted any evidence to substantiate this claim. This was unethical and despite my numerous discovery requests Elaina Baer never submitted 12 emails sent in a single day… she lied.

Jennifer Weisber Millner (Jennifer Millner) should have known that both her clients due-process rights and my due process rights were violated for the over 425 days that the DV case wasn’t scheduled, but she allowed it to happen without ever motioning the court for justice or adherence to the court rules.

Jennifer-Weisberg Millner & Eliana Baer have both been lawyers long enough to know that the sua sponte order Judge Fitzpatrick issued to strip me of my right to represent myself was unlawful and a violation of court rules, yet they were complicit with it.

==========================================================

CONCLUSION

==========================================================

1. In the end all of this will cost my wife and I much more time and money to resolve, which only benefits these slimy lawyers from Fox Rothschild.

2. I reported all of my concerns to the A.C.J.C. for Judicial Misconduct, Judge Glenn Grant – Acting Administrator of the Courts, Judge Mary C. Jacobson, etc… all of them just worked to cover this up, even after my cases were transferred to Burlington County where the retaliation continued under Judge John Tomassello who continued to violate my rights and retaliate for Judge Fitzptrick

3. Judge Tomasello is a total scumbag in my opinion. He actually took ex-parte testimony during the divorce trial and refused to allow me to cross-examine the witnesses he did this with. he also along with Judge Bookbinder prohibited me from appearing in court for my own trial dates on 2/18/2014 and 2/19/2014… THIS WAS ALSO UNLAWFUL AND MEANS MY FINAL ORDER FOR DIVORCE IS NOW VOID AND I HAVE TO GO BACK TO COURT FOR MORE TRIAL DATES JUST TO GET JUSTICE THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BY LAW AND BY COURT RULES.

MOST IMPORTANTLY HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE:

N.J. FAMILY COURT IS CORRUPT & INCOMPETENT – THE JUDGES FEEL THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW AND THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE BEST INTERESTS OF YOUR CHILDREN.

ALL THEY WANT TO DO IS HELP THEIR FRIENDS IN THE LOCAL BAR ASSOCIATION FLEECE YOU FOR ALL YOUR MONEY AND THEN ISSUE COURT ORDERS THAT WILL KEEP YOU DESTITUTE AND UNABLE TO HIRE A LAWYER TO GET JUSTICE.

==============================================

CLEARLY THESE PEOPLE MUST NOT UNDERSTAND THEIR OATHS OF OFFICE

…. PERHAPS THEY ARE CONFUSED???

==============================================

Robbing Justice

JENNIFER MILLNER / ELAINA BAER / FOX ROTHSCHILD ARE UNTHICAL AND ALLEGED TO STEAL MONEY FROM ESCROW ACCOUNTS

Standard

Lawyer Lying

=================================================================

HERE IS A SHORT SUMMARY OF

UNETHICAL AND/OR APPARENTLY ILLEGAL THINGS JENNIFER MILLNER AND FOX ROTHSCHILD HAVE DONE TO CREATE CONTENTIOUS LITIGATION

 =================================================================

FOX ROTHSCHILD DOES NOT APPEAR TO CARE ABOUT ITS CLIENTS OR THEIR CHILDREN, THEY ARE TYPICAL LAWYERS THEY APPEAR TO CARE ONLY ABOUT BILLABLE HOURS

DANA JANQUITTO, ESQ  (of Reed Smith)- A FORMER LAW CLERK ALSO GET’S DISHONORABLE MENTION FOR:

HER PARTICIPATION IN ORCHESTRATING A VIOLATION OF A COURT ORDER ISSUED BY THE JUDGE SHE WORKED FOR… SHE ACTUALLY HELPED MY WIFE VIOLATE A COURT ORDER – WITHOUT NOTIFYING THE OPPOSING PARTY OF HER EX-PARTE CONTACT!

SEE DETAILS BELOW:

===========================================================================

MY EXPERIENCE WITH FOX ROTHSCHILDS UNETHICAL OR ILLEGAL TACTICS:

===========================================================================

(this is an edited excerpt from an email sent to Fox Rothschild, my expectation is that they will NEVER directly address their conduct unless I sue them)

To: Eric Sotoloff (Fox Rothschild):

1. Jennifer Millner stole my money from her escrow accountand didn’t provide simultaneous statements – that is theft by deception and the statute of limitations hasn’t run out.

SEE NARRATIVE & SOURCE DOCUMENTS HERE ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB:
https://njcourtcorruption.com/2014/06/22/jennifer-weisberg-millner-jennifer-millner-alleged-to-be-a-thief/

OR SEE ATTACHMENTS WHICH DOCUMENT THE THEFT OF MY MONEY

NOTE: THE LINK TO THE NEWS BLOG ABOVE HAS BEEN READ ON 4 CONTINENTS NOW.

2. Fox Rothschild Conspired with InsiderScore and O’Donnell Newsome to make a false claim on a wages settlement of (gross) $50,000 from InsiderScore. I now have evidence of that. Eric I presume you were involved given that you used to work at O’Donnell Newsome and InsiderScore ironically retained them after Elaina Baer tortuously interferred in my settlement and had it frozen by the court ONLY AFTER YOUR FIRM CONVINCED INSIDERSCORE TO VIOLATE THE CONTRACT

3. Fox Rothschild Retained Dr. Scasta in 2011and didn’t disclose that conflict when Dr. Scasta was appointed to Wallace v. Syphrett in 2013… This was unethical. Shockingly Dr. Scasta didn’t reveal this conflict either, which is simply more evidence that the Mercer County Bar Association and the Courts are corrupt.

 4. Jennifer Millner allowed Judge Tomasello to violate the due process rights of my wife, my children, and myself in a manner that will lead us all back to court, and sadly generate more money for Fox Rothschild, unless my wife (copied to this email) finally get’s smart and realizes she can sue you for malpractice and pain and suffering along with me.  And yes I call her my wife because the Divorce Decree is Void.

5. Fox Rothschild admitted ALTERED EVIDENCE – TEXTS WITH WHITEOUT ALL OVER THEM AND DELETED MESSAGES TO OBTAIN A TRO, ELAINA BAER THEN FABRICATED TESTIMONY AS A WITNESS ON 12/4/2012…. THIS WILL BE REPORTED AND PUBLISHED. THE PUBLIC NEEDS TO KNOW HOW CORRUPT YOUR FIRM IS SO THAT MORE CHILDREN DON’T GET HURT BY YOUR LITIGATION TACTICS FOR PROFIT.  WHAT YOU DO IS NOTHING MORE THAN CHILD TRAFFICKING AND ITS ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING.  I HAVE THE SOURCE DOCUMENTS AND THE FAXES YOU SENT TO COURT WITH THE ALTERED EVIDENCE AND THE CONFLICTING NARRATIVE.

6. MY BANKRUPTCY PRE-EMPTS YOUR COLLECTION OF LEGAL FEES: Fox Rothschild Motioned for me to pay my wife’s legal fees even though I had the contingent liability DISCHARED IN BANKRUPTCY IN 2012… THIS WAS UNETHICAL AND RESULTED IN A VOID COURT ORDER FOR ME TO PAY YOU $100,000 OF MY WIFES $400,000 BILL…. YOU IDIOTS… THE FEDERAL COURT HAS ALREADY BARRED YOU FROM COLLECTING – SEE ATTACHED BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE.

7. Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick Admitted on the Record that Jennifer Millner arranged an illegal / violation of a court order for my wife in 2011 when my wife entered my house without consent, and had the sheriff’s department come in as well for illegal search and seizure of marital property!  This is now documented online and in the court record! My wife was found in contempt because Jennifer Millner and Judge Fitzpatrick’s Chambers consulted ex-parte to have Sheriff’s Enter my home… this alone is a $100,000 lawsuit (tolled thanks to my late discovery of the Sheriff’s side of the story).

Note: the Unlawful Violation of a Court order resulting in the unauthorized  entrance into my home in 2011 was arranged via a call from Jennifer Weisberg-Millner (Jennifer Millner) to Dana Janquitto, Esq (Former Law Clerk to Catherine Fitzpatrick). My presumption is that Dana Janquitto is now working at Reed Smith (www.reedsmith.com) and possibly is a dangerous lawyer because she has demonstrated she works without good ethics.

CLOSING THOUGHTS

MAYBE SOMEDAY JENNIFER MILLNER AND HER ASSOCIATES WILL DECIDE TO MAKE A MORE HONEST LIVING.

IF THEY DO MAYBE IT’LL LOOK SOMETHING LIKE THIS:

Ex Lawyer - Million Dollars

Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick & Alleged Cronyism

Standard

 Crony King

==================================================================

HERE IS A SHORT STORY OF APPARENT CRONYISM IN THE COURTS:

==================================================================

JUDGE FITZPATRICK’S OLD BOSS TOOK A JOB WITH HER HUSBANDS FIRM RIGHT AFTER SHE WAS PROMOTED TO PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE FAMILY PART.

A lot of Lawyers here in Mercer county have commented that my divorce Judge Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick became a presiding judge of the Family part incredibly quickly.

One lawyer John Hartmann revealed that she got the job because her husband was a high profile attorney for Stark & Stark. (John Hartmann is Judge Fitzpatrick’s cousin-in law.. Husbands Cousin).

Well for me the story was too compelling not to investigate – it ended with some tragic discoveries:

Story of the Presumed Judge Quid Pro Quo that bought Fitzpatrick’s Job:

1. Judge Fitzpatrick became a Judge in 2009 she became presiding judge of the Family Part in March 2010 (wow fast right).

2. Her husband is John Sakson of Stark & Stark.

3. Judge Smithison Retired (Former Presiding Judge of the Family Part) about March 2010 and took a Job at Stark & Stark (working for Judge Fitzpatrick’s Husband).

Note:

(a)Judge Smithison allowed his wife to sit on a jury as an alternate juror – the ACJC took no action but sent a letter telling him he shouldn’t do that! A wrist slap for misconduct was appropriate for the A.C.J.C. judicial disciplinary committee, because their job is primarily to cover up judicial misconduct rather than investigate it.

(b) Judge Smithison decided the Megan’s Law Case (he’s got juice).

4. Judge Fitzpatrick worked under Judge Andrew Smithison who was the presiding judge of the FP in 2009

5. THE SHOCKER: My wife’s attorney Jennifer Millner worked as a law clerk in the 80s for none other than Judge Smithison

Note Judge Fitzpatrick & Jennifer Millner also serve on a committee of the Mercer County Bar Association (Bench-Bar Committee). They actually discussed agenda items during my hearings and stated they would continue ex-parte discussions about issues related to my case at the Bench Bar’s next meeting.

Opinion:

It’s hard to have respect for a court system that runs on cronyism at the expense of the appearance of justice and integrity of the system.

Obviously the Judges and Lawyers do not place much emphasis on the appearance of justice or integrity, because if they did, stories like this would not be so common and not go un-investigated or reported.

This is just a small example of how our Judiciary has become the 3rd Branch of Government to fail the people. We are akin to prisoners of our own government than participants in it due to cronyism like this.

I’ve lost all respect for New Jersey and American Government, I really don’t believe the government officials care about anything else but fleecing their victims / ascending on the backs of honest poor people.

================================

Summary & Conclusion:

================================

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

================================

My wife’s lawyer and my judge both worked for Smithson.

My Judge probably bought her position from Smithson in exchanged for giving him a no show job, around the same time Judge Jacobson was promoted to Assignment Judge – so she kept her mouth shut and probably owes Fitzpatrick a favor for that too.

Presumably: Everybody in my case was related via money or favors except for me lol.

Presumably: It follows / is likely that Judge Smithison traded favors for a Job at Stark and Stark that resulted in a unqualified lawyer Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick (per comments from her own clients) lawyer to become the Presiding Judge of the Family Part purely for political considerations and quid-pro quo favors to her old boss Judge Smithson.

Isn’t that quaint…

Very Truly,

A plebeian scumbag & Victim of Legal Cronyism

Serfs hoe

 

Alleged Judicial Misconduct of Judge Bookbinder

Standard

deviljudge

Quick Summary – Punchline:

CLICK LINK BELOW TO SEE COURT ORDER – EVIDENCE OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT:

RONALD BOOKBINDER’S COURT ORDERS VIOLATE THE LAW 2/6/2014 – 3/10/2014 – HE REFUSED TO PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE SUPPORTING HIS DECISION (CLICK TO READ COURT ORDERS)

JUDGE RONALD E. BOOKBINDER’S ILLEGAL COURT ORDERS VIOLATE:

  • THE U.S. CONSTITUTION,
  • N.J. CONSTITUTION,
  • SUPREME COURT RULINGS:
  • BINDING PRECEDENTS OF FEDERAL 3RD CIRCUIT
  • JUDGE BOOKBINDER IS ALLEGED TO HAVE ABUSED HIS OFFICE FOR THE PURPOSES OF BULLYING A SELF-REPRESENTED FATHER
  • JUDGE BOOKBINDER VIOLATED THIS FATHER’S RIGHTS AND EFFECTIVELY SABATAGED THE FATHERS ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN HIS OWN TRIAL FOR CUSTODY OF THE FATHER’S OWN CHILDREN.
  • JUDGE JOHN TOMASELL AND JUDGE JOHN CALL WERE COMPLICIT IN THE VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION AT TRIAL IN FM-03-790-14:
    • Judge Tomasello held trial without the Defendant present, took testimony from the Plaintiff, and refused to allow the Defendant to cross-examine the Plaintiff
    • Judge Tomasello refused to hear the Defendant’s immediate appeal (a statutory right of the Defendant) in FV-03-1154-14
    • Judge John Call was the complicit presiding (Supervising) judge.

================================================

EVIDENCE OF JUDGE BOOKBINDER’S JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

(supported by Judge John Call & Judge John Tomasello):

===================================================

RONALD BOOKBINDER’S COURT ORDERS VIOLATE THE LAW 2/6/2014 – 3/10/2014 – HE REFUSED TO PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE SUPPORTING HIS DECISION (CLICK TO READ COURT ORDERS)

1. A Father ((Self-Represented / Pro Se litigant) prohibited from appearing in court for his own Trial!   THIS IS A VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO ACCESS THE COURTS.

2. Father (Self Represented / Pro Se Litigant) prohibited from meeting with Ombudsman to discuss his concerns.

  • This order was issued ex-parte with no notice & no hearing to the Father (no due process)
  • Order was only put in writing after the Father confronted Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder

3. Father (Self Represented / Pro Se Litigant) subjected to illegal court order that violated U.S. Supreme Court Decisions in Haines v. Kerner that permit a pro-se litigant to file pleadings contrary to court rules and procedures.

4. Father (Self Represented / Pro Se Litigant) Prohibited from viewing his own divorce files by court order

5. Judge Bookbinder  appears to have committed felony witness tampering in in State v. Syphrett System #03-2950-01 by admitting he consulted privately with a witness in State v. Syphrett about the case prior to the trial. He allowed the witness Judge Mary C. Jacobson to recommend bail conditions and civil restraints against Mr. Syphrett (the case was ultimately dismissed without any trial via highly unusual ex-parte motion by Prosecutor Joseph Bocchini of Mercer County).

 

===============================================

HOW THE LAW WAS VIOLATED BY JUDGE BOOKBINDER

===============================================

Fingers Crossed Oath

===============================================

After having my civil and criminal cases transferred to Burlington because Judges in Mercer County violated my rights, the apparent retaliation by judges continued in Burlington County via all manner of strange happenings.

1. Judge Bookbinder Consulted the Mercer County Judges despite the fact that Judge Mary C. Jacobson, Judge Pedro Jimenez, and Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick had been recused from my cases. THIS WAS BIZARRE!

2. Judge Bookbinder issued civil restraints against my access of the court without presenting any evidence to support these restraints. This was a violation of the law of the land per U.S. Supreme Court: Elrod v. Burns (1976)

See here where Elrod v. Burns clearly states that the government can not restrain a citizen’s 1st Amendment free speech without producing a burden of proof… Judge Bookbinder ignored this and acted as a tyrant rather than a Judge – in doing so he acted without subject matter jurisdiction.

=========================================================

LEGAL DECISIONS SUPPORTING MY ALLEGATIONS:

 Court Order Judge

=========================================================

  • Judge Bookbinder’s Violation of Supreme Courts Law (Elrod v. Burns & Haines v. Kerner) – Click Underlined Links to read:
    • NOTE THE U.S. SUPREME COURT FINDINGS IN  Elrod v. Burns, 427 US 347 – 1976 pursuant Buckley v. Valeo:

“Though First Amendment rights are not absolute, they may be curtailed only by interests of vital importance, the burden of proving the existence of which rests upon the government”

“Though First Amendment rights are not absolute, they may be curtailed only by interests of vital importance, the burden of proving the existence of which rests upon the government”

Haines v. Kerner Specifically States the Following:

“We cannot say with assurance that under the allegations of the pro se complaint, which we hold to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers, it appears ‘beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.’ Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41,45 46 (1957). See Dioguardi v. Durning, 139 F.2d 774 (CA2 1944)”

JUDGE BOOKBINDER SHOWED CONTEMPT FOR THE U.S. SUPREME COURT AND DECIDED HIS COUNTY COURT WAS ABOVE THE SUPREME COURT RULING – THIS VIOLATES THE LAW OF THE LAND!

=========================================================

EVIDENCE OF

THE ALLEGED JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT & ALLEGED FELONIES:

=========================================================

Magnify Glass FACTS

=========================================================

Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder issued a court order on 2/6/2014 and others which prohibited a father from appearing in court for the father’s own divorce, custody litigation!

THIS WAS A VIOLATION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION 14TH AMENDMENT.

SEE COURT ORDERS HERE:

2014-02-06 and 14-2-19 and 14-3-10 COURT ORDERS BOOKBINDER

List of Illegal Aspects of these Court Orders:

1. Pro Se Defendant prohibited from appearing in court without EXPRESS PERMISSION of a Superior Court Judge (Regardless of whether the Defendant had a trial date)!!

2.Pro Se Defendant prohibited from filing contrary to the court rules, even though U.S. Supreme Court and Third Circuit of Federal Court has issued precedent setting decisions that state a Pro Se Defendant need not follow the court rules or follow court procedures in pleadings or filings. See Decisions in:

  • Third Circuit Binding Precedents – Clearly Make Judge Bookbinder’s Court orders illegal / Void
      • In Picking: the plaintiffs civil rights was 150 pages and described by a federal judge as “inept.” Nevertheless, it was held: Where a plaintiff pleads pro-se in a suit for protection of civil rights, the court should endeavor to construe plaintiffs pleading without regard to technicalities.     (
    • Todaro v. Bowman, 872 F.2d 43, 44 n. 1, 3d Cir. 1989 (Click this Link):
      • Findings of Todaro Court:  As a pro se litigant Todaro is held to less stringent pleading standards and we will afford him a liberal interpretation of our procedural rules. We will, therefore, consider the first amendment claim as properly before us. (iv) McTeague v. Sosnowski, 617 F.2d 1016, 1019 (3d Cir.1980).

 

===================================================

ABOUT JUDGE RONALD E. BOOKBINDER:

===================================================

Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder has a reputation in Burlington County for being a gregarious, even tempered Judge, with a keen mind for Municipal Ordinances and Laws.

I don’t Dispute that.

However: I have seen Judge Ronald Bookbinder apparently commit crimes of Official Misconduct (a felony) and violate his oath of office and the United States Constitution.

 

===================================================

CONCLUSION:

===================================================

I am a first person witness to a Superior Court Judge of New Jersey deciding that he is ABOVE THE LAW

I have witnessed Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder show complete disrespect for U.S. Supreme Court rulings, the Constitution, court rules, and “THE LAW”.

Everybody who reads this blog and views these court orders is now also a witness to the fact that Judge Bookbinder has diminished the integrity of the court and violated his oath of Office.

 The End Loonie Toons

 

 

Father’s Rights & Constitution Trampled by NJ Courts in 2011

Standard


FCLUlogoB2

Tyrannical New Jersey Family Court Judge Terrorizes Good Father

Posted by Bruce Eden President FCLU.org

… the wife, an Austrian national, came to the US, got her college degree and CPA license. Almost immediately his wife filed a domestic violence restraining order claiming he harassed and threatened her. A copy of her personal diary in July of 2009 shows that she was “going to so f–cking divorce him, that she was going to so f–cking make him suffer for the rest of his life”.

 

Immediately after filing the restraining order, the children would not go home to the mother and went back to the father. The mother followed them to the father, breaking her own restraining order. Thewife confronted the father’s 73-year old mother and told his motherif she goes near the children again she (wife) would kill her. The children’s grandmother filed for a restraining order against the wife. That’s when the wife began “piling on” the charges against the father. That’s also about the same time the wife was given an attorney by the NJ Battered Womens Services, who the wife went to see for aid and assistance. However, this attorney, Christian Van Pelt, of Cedar Knolls, was ineligible to practice law at the time, because he failed to pay his annual fee for the NJ Clients Protection Trust Fund. Every paper filed by her lawyer was done while the lawyer was practicing law without a license. No matter.

 

The wife stalked the father in June 2011 because the children went back to the father’s place. When the father put the children in the car to take them back to the mother, the mother hiding her car behind some large bushes pulled out in front of the father’s car at the bottom of the driveway. The father jammed on his brakes and slid into her car. She then charged him with violating a restraining order even though she was stalking the father, and then charged him with assault by auto.

 

When the father attempted to file for a restraining order against the wife, he went before the same New Jersey domestic violence judge, Thomas Critchley, JSC that granted the wife’s restraining orders and subsequent FRO violations. It goes without saying that Morris County, NJ Judge Critchley was biased against the father and dismissed the father’s domestic violence complaint.

 

The mother grabbed the children and then began moving into the battered women’s shelters and received taxpayer-funded food stamps, stipends, cash, and even housing. Yet, the father cannot get a restraining order against the mother with valid proof. This is taxpayer fraud where battered women’s services abuse the funding to damage and destroy families, and men cannot get one dime of funding for battered men’s services through government funding. This constitutes a major civil rights violation in New Jersey and the rest of the United States.

 

The mother filed multiple violations of restraining orders against the father, keeping the children away from the father. The children e-mailed, texted and called the father’s sister and paternal grandmother telling them what shelter they were in, that they weren’t being fed properly, and that they were not going to school. The paternal grandmother would bring food and cellphones to the children because the mother kept taking them away from the children.

 

Finally the mother alleged that the father had appeared at a shelter and filed for contempt of the restraining order.The wife’s lawyer filed orders to show cause to cut the father completely off from the children, and jail him indefinitely while the wife would be granted her divorce by default and gain sole custody of the children with no visitation. The father got wind of this and filed a Federal Notice of Removal and Petition on September 2, 2011.

 

He filed the Federal Removal action to remove the entire state case into Federal Court in the morning of the 2nd and deprive the state of further jurisdiction of the cases. Judge Critchley and the matrimonial judge, Catherine Enright, JSC ignored the Federal removal petition, even though they acknowledged its existence in transcripts and in orders. Once the Removal occurred the state court judges were without jurisdiction to proceed.

 

But proceed they did. They deprived the father of his children. Judge Critchley also put out a fraudulent civil Arrest Warrant for Peter Bresko, who was arrested 4 days later–4 days after the state case had been removed to Federal Court, depriving the state court judges of all jurisdiction. However, Judge Critchley has jailed Bresko on a civil contempt and told Bresko that he would be released when the judge felt like it. The judge told Bresko he was going to allow the mother to leave the state with the children and set up residence in a New England state, where they have a corresponding battered womens shelter. Judge Critchley has called Bresko into court from jail several times demanding all kinds of compliance from Bresko that Bresko cannot comply with while in jail. Critchley has ordered, though not in writing, that he wants Bresko psychiatrically evaluated. He told Bresko to tell him who helped him write legal papers since Bresko is representing himself, after Critchley threatened his former attorney. He wants Bresko to turn over the diary implicating the wife. The diary is evidence of mitigating circumstances that would exonerate Bresko of the bogus domestic violence charges. Bresko has been asserting his Fifth Amendment Rights as explained in Miranda v. Arizona where he can assert those rights even in civil proceedings. He has told Judge Critchley he has no authority and must release him because the Federal Removal occurred prior to the Arrest Warrant issuance and Bresko’s arrest 4 days later.

 

Judge Critchley is a judge out of control and dangerous to society. He was a former domestic violence prosecutor that is now a domestic violence judge. He has become an ideologue for the radical domestic violence coalitions, which constitutes a conflict of interest since he was promoted because of his assistance to the battered womens services of NJ. Judge Critchley has even filed his own Order to Show Cause against Bresko, stepping down off the bench and becoming Bresko’s adversary and prosecutor. Judges cannot be a judge and prosecutor in a case. It is a serious judicial misconduct violation. But Critchley believes he is above the law and continues to hold Bresko in jail for almost 40 days without Due Process or right to be released on bail.

 

Bresko’s sister hired an attorney to get him out on the criminal issues, and that attorney is too intimidated by the judge. A new, young attorney was just hired and Critchley threatened to throw that attorney in jail for contempt for defending Bresko vigorously. Judge Critchley is a rogue judge that must be removed from the bench, have his state judicial pension revoked, and be subjected to psychiatric treatment. Anyone who can, they need to call the New Jersey Governor’s Office and also Judge Critchley’s chambers in Morris County Courthouse, Morristown, New Jersey to demand that this fascist judge immediately release Bresko and demand Critchley resign afterwards.

NEW JERSEY MOTHER VICTIMIZED BY COURTS FOR $1.4 MILLION

Standard


FCLUlogoB2

STOP LEGAL ABUSE OF A MOTHER

New Jersey Court Defrauds Mother of $1.4M in Legal
Fees & Eliminates All Parenting Rights

Mother Launches $400M Suit Against Judiciary

Demand Judge Sogluizzo Step Down
CONTACT STU RABNER & GLENN GRANT TODAY
stuart.Rabner@judiciary.state.nj.us
glenn.grant@judiciary.state.nj.us

Family Court – The Brilliant Racket (TM)
Remember: It’s Conflict For Cash

Actual Plea Being Ignored By Rabner & Grant:

Messrs. Grant, and Chief Justice Rabner:

On May 2,2014, I filed a civil complaint in the Hudson County Law Division, Civil Part, against Hudson County Family Court Judge, Maureen Sogluizzo, P.J.F.P., Hudson County Vicinage, Superior Court and State of New Jersey. I filed for Jury Demand, Demand for Discovery and Deposition Notice against Maureen Sogluizzo In Official capacity as a Judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Maureen Sogluizzo, in “personal” capacity and as employee of Corporation of State of New Jersey (also defined as person”); Hudson County Court Vicinage; Superior Court of New Jersey; State of New Jersey in its corporate “personal” capacity, jointly, severally and,/or in the alternative.

On May 6,2014, I received an Order From Judge Peter F. Bariso Jr., A.J.S.C who is the assignment Judge of Hudson County, stating the following “On motion of this court sua sponte, in order to preserve the appearance unbiased hearing, IT IS ON THIS 6th DAY OF MAY, 2014, ORDERED that venue be transferred to Essex County for disposition by a Superior Court Judge to be designated by the Assignment Judge.”

On May 13,2014, I received a track assignment notice from Essex County – Civil Division notifying me of a new Docket number, ESX L-003415’1,4 (EXHIBI #3) On May L9,2OT4,I filed a motion with Hudson County Assignment Judge Bariso to disqualify/recuse Defendant Judge Maureen Sogluizzo. Judge Bariso clearly stated in his Order, dated May 6, 2074,that there was a conflict of Interest, and in order to show impartiality and lack of bias, the case was transferred to Essex County from Hudson County so I could get a fair hearing.

Judge Maureen Sogluizzo who is now a Defendant in this instant case refuses to disqualify herself from my family court matter, Docket No. FM-09-1722-09, and wants to conduct two (2) hearings in a family court Judge capacity on the 13th of June,2014, where plaintiff ex-husband, (name redacted), wishes to sanction me for no reason other than he and his former attorneys at the Beilan, Miklos & Makrogiannis law firm (whom I sued in an earlier lawsuit and are no longer representing my former husband because of conflict of- interest and lack of impartiality; or so I think) are in concert with Judge Sogluizzo and want to extort money from me.

Defendant Judge Sogluizzo wrongfully ordered the relocation of my minor daughter to North Carolina in direct contravention to six (6) evaluation reports from experts, including psychiatrists and psychologists, three (3) of which were appointed by her who stated that I should have had unsupervised shared parenting at the least and sole custody because the father who had his own agenda to remove the mother from the child’s life through the relocation and parental alienation. My former husband has been in North Carolina since July 2013 and my daughter is suffering severe emotional distress since being removed from my custody, and New Jersey, where all of her friends, school, therapists, and maternal family are. My former husband has no family in the United States.

Defendant Judge Sogluizzo acted improperly and denied my former husband’s motion for relocation, calling it inimical to the child’s “best interests” because of the aforementioned reasons to not allow the child to move because everything for her is in New Jersey. Within 20 days Defendant Sogluizzo changed her mind and sent my daughter to North Carolina with my former husband-without the prerequisite plenary hearing involving a “Baures v. Lewis ” relocation hearing, and without a “best interest” hearing. Defendant Judge Sogluizzo postponed the plenary hearing, because she told me that her mother-in-law died and that if I don’t drop the plenary hearing (at that time), I would have to wait another 3 months to have overnight visitation with my then 7 year-old daughter. Defendant Judge Sogluizzo also has ignored various motions where I have requested equal time with my daughter. This is all supported by all mental health evaluation expert reports but she ignores it and now has set up a hearing on June 23rd, 2013,which is to be for an expansion of my time with my child and the entire summer parenting time with my child.

In light of the law suit which makes her a Defendant, Judge Sogluizzo will now act in a vindictive fashion violating Canon 3 of the NJ Code of Judicial Conduct (Judge must be impartial). As a defendant she is not capable of being impartial and must be disqualified immediately from my case as an acting Judge. Most importantly all parties and the minor child now reside in North Carolina. I am only using the above address in care-of (Under my mother) because I am in and out of the state moving. Also under the UCCJEA, New Jersey’s exclusive, continuing jurisdiction is retained until a court of this State determines that neither the child, or the child and one parent have a significant connection with this state, and that substantial evidence is no longer available in this state concerning the child’s care, protection, training and personal relationships. My former husband and my child moved to North Carolina as of July 1,2013. My former husband has taken up a job working for a large bank there and has married again. The child has been enrolled in school in North Carolina and is completing her Grade 2 in North Carolina. She goes to doctors and therapists in North Carolina and has no further contacts in New Jersey, other than her maternal grandparents and cousins whom she visits when with me. I have now established a residence and driver’s license in North Carolina. The case must be transferred to North Carolina given the two (2) sets of circumstances. I attach case law to support the transfer of Jurisdiction to North Carolina courts where all parties are scheduled for a hearing on June 9,2014 through a complaint that was filed in April 2014.

Defendant Judge Sogluizzo continues to act in a biased fashion and has financially and emotionally ruined me and my family, including ruining the well-being of my daughter. I would strongly request that in the interest of impartiality, and integrity of the courts, that Defendant Judge Sogluizzo no longer hear any of my matters and be removed from my case, because not only is she the defendant in my civil action in Essex County,but under the UCCJEA, she no longer has jurisdiction over any of the parties or the child.

Respectfully:

Monisha Shivani

Hon. Peter Bariso, A.J.S.C. (fax no. (201) 795-0725,
Judge Maureen Sogluizzo, P.J.F.P. (fax no. (201) 795-6199)

Families Civil Liberties Union
www.fclu.org