Monthly Archives: July 2014

KANGAROO COURT: A DAD’S MOTION TO VACATE DUE TO VIOLATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS

Standard

Kangaroo Court Judge

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY IS OFTEN A KANGAROO COURT:

Here is a motion that I just filed with the court to remind the court that it was unlawful and a violation of my constitutional rights to hold a trial while prohibiting me to appear in Court (By Order of Ronald Bookbinder).

The underlying trial I am addressing in this case was domestic violence case where the Plaintiff Kathryn Bischoff made false statements to the police and to the court stating that she had attempted to cease contacting me on 1/15/2013 when in fact she continued to message me via text, Facebook, and even wished me a happy birthday via text (1/24/2013); A Facebook Friend Request (1/26/2013) and additional texts from this woman were sent to me on 1/27-1/31/2013).

I submitted this evidence to the court via an “immediate appeal” and a motion for dismissal… all to no avail!

SEE DOCUMENTS HERE:

IMMEDIATE MOTION FOR APPEAL – Katy Bischoff Evidence Katy Bischoff – Google and Facebook

Of course I was found guilty of domestic violence based on a fictional account of events. Best of All Judge John Tomasello in Burlington County actually ignored my “immediate appeal” filing which was a statutory right. Judge Tomasello ignored my due process rights and found me guilty by default despite the fact I submitted pleadings to the court (which he didn’t consider).

BELOW IS THE MOTION I JUST FILED WITH THE COURT TO VACATE THE UNLAWFUL COURT ORDER FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

LINK TO DOCUMENT:

MOTION TO VACATE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FINAL ORDER (COURT RULE 4:50)

(Remember there was no harassment and no violence, no threats of violence, and no consideration of my written pleadings by Judge Tomasello)… that is supposed to be justice!

Kangaroo Judicial Notice

BEST OF ALL THERE WAS A COURT ORDER

PROHIBITING ME FROM APPEARING IN COURT

SEE THIS RIDICULOUS COURT ORDER HERE:

LINK TO DOCUMENT:

UNLAWFUL COURT ORDERS OF JUDGE RONALD BOOKBINDER

(Thanks Judge Bookbinder, that seems fair… I can have a trial so long as I don’t appear in person…. I feel very colored… or negro now circa 1845 slavery)

SERIOUSLY TAKE A LOOK AT THE ORDER WITHOUT CLICKING HERE:

Court Order Bookbinder - Unlawful pg1

Court Order - Bookbinder Unlawful pg2

LEGAL NOTICE:

THE INFORMATION ABOVE HAS BEEN POSTED FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING TRANSPARENCY INTO THE COURT

FURTHER:

THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DOCKET CEASED BEING CONFIDENTIAL WHEN JUDGE BOOKBINDER COMBINED STATUS HEARING ORDERS WITH A PUBLIC CRIMINAL CASE FILE – THUS ELIMINATING THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THIS MATTER BY EXPOSING THE MATTER IN PUBLIC CASE FILES

I THEREFORE INVOKE MY RIGHT TO DISCUSS THIS PUBLIC MATTER.

PROOF OF CORRUPTION: Judge Bookbinder’s Unlawful Court Orders: Prohibiting Father from Appearing in Court at his Own Trial

Standard

Serfs Dont fight back

 

JUDGE BOOKBINDER VIOLATED A FATHER’S RIGHT TO PROTECT HIS CHILDREN AND REPRESENT HIMSELF AT TRIAL WITH THIS COURT ORDER.

CLEARLY IT IS UNLAWFUL TO PROHIBIT A DEFENDANT FROM APPEARING IN COURT AT HIS OWN TRIAL, BUT THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT JUDGE BOOKBINDER DID.

JUDGE BOOKBINDER MUST BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE UNLESS HE TAKES REMEDIAL ACTION. EVEN THEN HIS FITNESS TO SERVE AS A JUDGE IS QUESTIONABLE

SEE EVIDENCE BELOW:

Court Order Bookbinder - Unlawful pg1

Court Order - Bookbinder Unlawful pg2ADDITIONALLY:

This court order violates the Supreme Court ruling in Haines v. Kerner 1972 by requiring a pro se defendant to file all pleadings consistent with the court rules. In fact the Supreme Court has ruled this is not a requirement any court can legally enforce or make upon a Defendent.

FURTHER:

Within the Third Circuit Federal Courts (New Jersey’s Jurisdiction) the court has confirmed that a pro se litigant can not be held to be strictly bound by court rules. See Todaro v. Bowman or Picking v. Pennsylvania.

CONCLUSION:

It is quite clear from the evidence above and Judge Bookbinder’s numerous ex-parte communications with me that he is not acting lawfully, but instead trying to continue a pattern of retaliation and abuse that began in my case before it was transferred from Mercer County to Burlington County due to the improper conduct of Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick.

SEE THE OTHER ARTICLES ON THIS CITE ABOUT THE MISCONDUCT OF JUDGE FITZPATRICK AND JUDGE BOOKBINDER, THE INFORMATION IS QUITE ILLUMINATING.

Serfs hoeRemember: If you have to go to a New Jersey Family Court You’ll need to prepare to have your savings raided and have your 1st Amendment Rights eviscerated (become a Serf)

Judge Peter Warshaw – THIS ISN’T DOMESTIC VIOLENCE!!!

Standard

DV TEXT ALTERED

ABOVE:

Altered / Fraudulent Evidence Submitted by:

Jennifer Millner & Eliana Baer of Fox Rothschild

to support Frivolous Domestic Violence Charges

===============================

ABOUT THE ABOVE TEXT:

===============================

  • TEXT IS AN ACT OF FRAUD (ALTERED EVIDENCE). SEE CLEARLY VISIBLE WHITEOUT STRIPS (IN THE IMAGE ABOVE) COVERING FRIENDLY TEXTS FROM THE FATHER.
  • ALTERED EVIDENCE ISN’T ADMISSIBLE IN A COURT OF LAW OR EQUITY, BUT JUDGE WARSHAW ALLOWED MY WIFE MEG WALLACE TO USE THIS TEXT IN ITS ALTERED FORM TO JUSTIFY A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CHARGE AGAINST ME.
  • THIS TEXT MESSAGE WAS USED TO JUSTIFY A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CHARGE AGAINST A FATHER (DEREK SYPHRETT) AND DENY THE FATHER REGULAR VISITATION WITH HIS CHILDREN FOR OVER A YEAR.
  • THIS TEXT IS EVIDENCE THAT THE FAMILY COURTS ARE CORRUPT, AND SEPARATE PARENTS FROM CHILDREN SIMPLY TO CREATE HIGHER CHILD SUPPORT ORDERS BY DESTROYING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LOVING PARENTS AND CHILDREN.
  • THIS TEXT WAS SENT TO 20 PEOPLE ON THE DAY MY TRIAL WAS ADJOURNED, MY WIFE WAS INADVERTENTLY ON THE DISTRIBUTION LIST.
  • THERE WAS NO RESTRAINING ORDER IN PLACE THE DAY THIS TEXT WAS SENT – SO IT MAKES NO SENSE THAT I WAS ACCUSED OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OR PROHIBITED FROM SEEING MY CHILDREN

 

THE STORY OF THE ABUSE OF

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ALLEGATIONS

Story Book Domestic Violence

It has become public knowledge in the legal community that Domestic Violence Restraining Orders are often used during divorce in order for a Plaintiff (usually the wife) to get a temporary custody order and increased child support.

I experienced this twice during my divorce proceedings with Margaret J. Wallace (Meg Wallace). She lied twice to get Temporary Restraining Orders (TRO).

Each time Jennifer Millner / Eliana Baer of Fox Rothschild attempted to coerce me into giving my wife money or more custody (resulting in more money) in exchange for dropping what were fraudulent, frivolous Domestic Violence Complaints.

MY CASE AND

JUDGE WARSHAW, jUDGE DEBELLO, & JUDGE FITZPATRICK

in this article / post about how ridiculous Domestic Violence TRO’s have become in New Jersey I’ve provided an example of one of the most ridiculous Domestic Violence TRO’s ever issued in any state (its mine).

The purported crime I was alleged to be guilty of was sending my wife a text message that stated:

“Yay I got my trial Adjoured until march”

SOURCE DOCUMENT: 2012-12-04 – ALTERED EVIDENCE USED FOR TRO

NOW ASK YOURSELF THIS:

  1. QUESTION: is the above Text Message in anyway an act of DOMESTIC VIOLENCE?

ANSWER: NO … There is no threat. The statement was factual.

2. QUESTION: Is this text a threat to my children’s Wellbeing that SHOULD justify the IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF MY PARENTING TIME?

ANSWER: NO, THIS TEXT HAD NO BEARING ON MY PARENTING TIME OR MY RELATIONSHIP WITH MY CHILDREN.

YET REMARKABLY JUDGE PETER WARSHAW ORDERED THAT I CEASE ALL CONTACT WITH MY CHILDREN AND THAT MY PARENTAL RIGHTS EFFECTIVELY BE TEMPORARILY TERMINATED WITH REGARD TO CONTACT TO MY CHILDREN.

THIS WAS AN OUTRAGEOUS INJUSTICE AND WAS COMPLETELY DISRESPECTFUL TO MY CHILDREN’S DEVELOPMENTAL NEEDS AND MY OWN PARENTAL RIGHTS.

SEE THE TEXT SUBMITTED TO THE COURT HERE:

EVIDENCE:

Here are links to ALTERED TEXT MESSAGES THAT MY WIFE’S LAWYERS (JENNIFER MILLNER / ELIANA BAER) SUBMITTED TO THE COURT AS EVIDENCE THAT I COMMITTED HARASSMENT / DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

THE DOCUMENTS HERE ARE OUTRAGEOUS:

  1. 2012-12-04 – ALTERED EVIDENCE USED FOR DV CHARGE – FOX ROTHSCHILD LAWYERS UNETHICAL
  • NOTICE: THE White out covering the majority of this purported text message that allegedly put my wife Meg Wallace in fear for her life.
  • The text contains a single statement “Yay I got my trial adjourned” … YET SOMEHOW JUDGE PETER WARSHAW CLAIMED THAT THIS WAS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND HE SAID I SHOULD HAVE NO PARENTING TIME AS A RESULT!!!
  • MY 3 AND 5 YEAR OLD CHILDREN WERE SHOCKED AND HEARTBROKEN AFTER OUR REGULAR TELEPHONE CALLS WERE INTERRUPTED WITH OUT WARNING

2. LETTER TO COURT EXPLAINING MY CONCERNS ABOUT MY WIFE’S HISTORY OF LYING TO THE COURT ABOUT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE:

 

CONCLUSION:

i Intend to update this post at a later date with the evidence that I informed the court of my wife and her lawyers fraudulent submission of a ALTERED text message which removed the friendly texts I sent my wife (like “Happy Birthday, Truly… on my wife’s birthday).

But for the sake of publishing this draft version of information I’ll conclude by saying:

My FRO trial was not provided in 10 days as NJ Statutes require, instead the Judge delayed my FRO trial so that I went over a year without seeing my children and without being able to calm my children or let them know that I truly loved them.

This sort of activity by the court and unethical lawyers like Jennifer Millner and Eliana Baer should not be allowed to interfere with the loving relationship that a father like me has with his two children.

Needless to say Meg Wallace (Margaret Wallace) who is a nurse at Lawerence Memorial Hospital should never have attempted to file a fraudulent TRO against an honest man, because her actions and the actions of women like her actually diminish that protections available to real victims of domestic violence and such actions make a mockery of the courts.

In the end I actually believe the Domestic Violence laws should be completely scrapped, and men accused of domestic violence should face criminal courts not “family courts”, because the criminal process is more fair and less rife with abuse. additionally women do not need special laws to protect them, women are perfectly capable of filing criminal complaints and providing evidence and testimony to juries.

There is no need for special DV laws that allow women to abuse the process to hurt men and children who have done nothing wrong.

Lastly I would EMPHASIZE THAT MY WIFE’S DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CHARGES WERE DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS – WITHOUT MERIT OVER 425 DAYS LATER WHEN MY CASE WAS TRANSFERRED AWAY FROM JUDGES IN MERCER COUNTY.

Whistleblowing Social Worker Faces NJ Retaliation for trying to protect a 12-year old boy… The Boy Committed Suicide (Shame on Judge Mary Margaret McViegh)

Standard

Scales Flaiming

THIS STORY HAS LED TO A FEDERAL LAWSUIT – OF COURSE IT IS UNLIKELY THE FEDERAL COURT WILL DO THE RIGHT THING AND PROTECT THE PUBLIC FROM THE NJ FAMILY COURT.  SEE STORY BELOW:

From: Fourwinds.com (click here for full story)

NYACK, N.Y. , June 8 /PRNewswire/ —

Whistle-blower Jill Jones-Soderman, a New York -based social worker and the executive director of The Foundation for the Child Victims of the Family Courts, says she is being persecuted by New Jersey government officials for her role in revealing explosive information.

According to Jones-Soderman, the problems started when she was subpoenaed by a client inNew Jersey to provide information to the family court. She was working pro-bono as a therapist and forensic advocate on the case. While trying to bring certain facts to the attention of the court, Jones-Soderman claims Judge Mary Margaret McVeigh used her position to suppress evidence and testimony, and eventually to retaliate by placing a false complaint with theNew Jersey licensing board. Now, the licensing board is actively contacting other state boards where Jones-Soderman is licensed and posting what are supposed to be closed hearings on the internet.

The suppression of evidence and the collaboration of the various parties involved in the case may have led to the suicide of a 12-year-old boy, Jones-Soderman explained. The boy “refused to be taken from the protective custody of his mother to be placed with the brutal treatment and intimidation of his father,” she said. The young boy left a note that read “I love you mom.”

“Not one licensing board was in any way interested in the underlying issue of the case: the protection of young children in a wildly rogue, fraudulent and biased court,” Jones-Soderman said, adding that the Attorney General’s office has been harassing her and her clients using tax-payer money ever since. “Patients visited by the attorney general’s office have continued as my patients and have testified on my behalf only to be themselves ridiculed and threatened in court.”

Eventually the attorney general’s office and its licensing boards – through what Jones-Soderman calls deception and intimidation – removed her state license. She says assistant state attorney Susan Berger threatened “that if I did not sign what she wanted me to sign; I would not leave the courtroom in time to pick up my child from school.”

One of the heavy hitters who has come to her defense is Dr. Monty Weinstein, an internationally acclaimed forensic expert and the founder of the Family Therapy Center. “The bureaucrats of the state in my opinion have to be held accountable for this complicitous witch hunt against a fine, brilliant and creative therapist,” he wrote in an affidavit filed with the court. “I hope and pray that I will get to opine.”

Jones-Soderman has filed multiple civil rights law-suits including a racketeering influenced and corrupt organizations complaint in federal court against various state actors. The filings allege that these accusations have made Jones-Soderman vulnerable to extortion. She is also pursuing multi-million dollar suits against some of her former attorneys, who she claims made no attempt to protect her rights.

For more information about the work of Jill Jones-Soderman and her organization, please visit www.notinvain.org,

www.lawisnotjustice.com

SEE MORE ABOUT THIS STORY HERE:

NJ Judge McViegh Under Fire for Alleged Corruption

SOURCE Jill Jones-Soderman

[COMMENT: I was utterly disgusted when I read about this story and the conduct of a Judge potentially leading to the suicide of a 12 year old boy. Worse the woman who was trying to protect the boy ended up being victimized to the point of having her career destroyed.

As a citizen I demand the Judicial Conduct Committee, Chief Justice Rabner, Judge Glenn Grant, and Joanne Dietrich investigate this matter, in the interest of Justice and for the sake of upholding the integrity of the court.

This story deserves to be fully investigated at a minimal]

VANISHING FILES IN PENNSYLVANIA – SIMILAR TO MY EXPERIENCE IN NJ

Standard

Reports of vanishing legal documentation are now emerging

(FROM THE TRENTON INDEPENDENT GAZETTE: Click to see More Great Content & Support Their Reporting)

As the Custody for Cash saga continues and new information is brought forth, the Independent Gazette has discovered yet another issue worth investigating within the family court system. According to several sources, docket listings — and even entire dockets — are often incomplete or inaccurate. Items often vanish from the record, and even the records themselves seem to disappear.

Once an action is initiated within the county court system, the court clerk is required to create an entry on a docket sheet or docket listing. These entries are chronologically listed, and each one should note the date and description of the action filed, including, but not limited to, motions, briefs, petitions, orders and rulings. An order should not be entered on the docket listing, for example, without the corresponding hearing that resulted in that order.

Family courts, however, seem to have trouble creating and maintaining accurate docket listings, according to a confidential Gazette source. Again, it should be noted that sources who ask to remain anonymous do so as a result of a legitimate fear of judicial and court retribution. Intimidation and scare tactics seem to be par for the course, with children seemingly being used as leverage to ensure litigants’ silence. “They’re playing a game of high-stakes chicken,” said the source. This mother, a litigant in a custody case in Berks County, realized only by accident that the Guardian ad Litem (GAL) appointed to represent the best interests of her children began filing all court documents pertaining to the family’s case in Dependency Court rather than Family Court to intentionally hide the filings from the litigant. Our source further stated that the opposing litigant in her case submitted to a lie detector test in an effort to clear himself of sexual abuse allegations; however, the results of that lie detector test went missing — for two years. “You file stuff, it gets lost and then miraculously they find it,” she said. She continued, “And it’s not just me. Everybody believes the façade that there is truth and justice, but it’s a mockery. It’s a free-for-all and there’s nobody watching the candy store.”

Lawsuit file goes missing in Lycoming County
Steve Wicks filed a federal lawsuit alleging local, state, and federal corruption, and claims he was blatantly lied to when he requested his file from the Lycoming County Prothonotary. Wicks was told that his entire file was missing. He returned to the clerk of courts office a second time in July 2013 and this time a staff member gave Wicks a file including emails between William Burd, the county prothonotary and Robin Read, county solicitor as well as a letter from Burd to Lycoming County judge Dudley Anderson dated April 8, 2010. This letter clearly states: “Since the attached file was mentioned in the ‘federal lawsuit,’ I have kept same in a sealed file cabinet behind my desk since 3/9/2010.” Additionally, Read states in an email dated June 5, 2010, to Burd that an attorney had gone to Judge Anderson’s chambers to review Wicks’ file and it was “spread out all over a table,” and it was “a mess.” All emails and letters are included as exhibits in Wicks’ lawsuit to substantiate his claim that the courts are corrupt.

Harrisburg civil rights attorney Don Bailey, who represents Wicks, stated in a phone interview that he will not back down. “They were hiding his files,” he said. “They were lying and this stuff has got to stop.” Bailey continued, explaining that they feel these files were hidden in an effort to cover criminal actions, and that it was a “grand conspiracy to reconstruct [Wicks’] file.” Bailey said other attorneys in Pennsylvania are often not free to speak about such corruption as they worry about retaliation from the courts. “Attorneys seem to care more about their relationship with the court before their clients,” he said. Bailey, a self-proclaimed “boat rocker,” has been advocating for clients whose civil rights have been violated for a number of years. He added that “there is a questionable transaction [every] minute” within the court system. “It’s a good-old-boys system and the Judicial Conduct Board and the Lawyers Disciplinary Board should be thoroughly investigated.” While he is concerned about retaliation against himself and his family, Bailey stated in no uncertain terms “they are not going to shut me up.”

A drug test in exchange for docket access?
Edward Bonifanti, a father fighting to retain his parental rights to his two small children, discovered when he asked the Lackawanna County Clerk of Courts for his own docket listing that it had been given to the county Children and Youth Services. Lackawanna County CYS is the plaintiff in Bonifanti’s case. Bonifanti wondered why the plaintiff would be given the opportunity to add or delete documentation at will. “I don’t know why the plaintiff has my documents,” he said. “It is absolutely ridiculous.” Bonifanti said he entered the Clerk of Courts office in downtown Scranton and, upon requesting his listing, was initially informed that it did not exist. When he questioned this response, he was told that even if the docket was in the office that staff could not provide him with it without breaching confidentiality. Bonifanti said he reminded staff that he was, in fact, entitled to true and unaltered copies of his docket under the Freedom of Information Act, at which point he was promptly asked to leave the building.

A phone call to the Lackawanna County Clerk of Courts office to verify this information was quickly disconnected with no comment. Bonifanti then visited his CYS Caseworker, Korey Fleming, to request the same information. According to Bonifanti, Fleming first informed him that the county solicitor would need a week to prepare the files as information would need to be redacted. When Bonifanti reminded Fleming that he was entitled to unaltered copies Fleming then told him he would need to submit to a drug screening. Bonifanti, who states he has voluntarily submitted to more than 20 drug tests and with each result negative, refused. “I’m here to get my files,” he told Fleming. “I don’t see how a drug test is necessary.” Upon his refusal, Bonifanti was informed that he would be marked as having an automatic positive result. A call to Fleming was not answered and a message was not returned. “I will get my documents,” said Bonifanti. His children were removed from his custody in February 2013, and Bonifanti has been fighting for their return since. He said he intends to continue fighting, even though he is facing a hearing to terminate his parental rights on June 4, 2014. “I love them and I miss them,” he said. “I will get my kids back.”

Former Client of Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick Describes Unethical Practice of Law

Standard

Evil Devil Lawyer

Introduction:

Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick was a Mercer county lawyer. As a lawyer she failed her clients, damaged children and destroyed fathers for profit, according to a former client.

Below is a description of her conduct by a former client (from West Windsor Plainsboro Today):

“My experience with Catherine Fitzpatrick was slightly different. She charged me less than $20,000 for my divorce but the damage she caused my children who were just 4 and 5 at the time of separation was beyond repair.

When I separated a few years ago, I had some issues with my ex-husband but nothing that should have caused me to file for divorce. He used little alcohol but was never drunk, no drugs and was never physically abusive to me. He got angry sometimes, but so did I, mostly due to the pressures of every day life.

Now I know better.

He is a good man who has always been very good to my children. What Fitzpatrick wrote in the divorce papers made him appear to be the No. 1 danger to my kids and to society. She wrote asking that he only receives supervised visitations, undergo psychological testing, anger management, AA, etc. and counseled me against allowing him to see or even talk to his own children for over 3 months “just to have an upper psychological edge” and bring him down to his knees.

Since separation took him by surprise, my ex did not learn how to file a motion to get some visitations until 2 months later. The children had to suffer from not seeing or talking to their father of over 3 months. Later, rather than counsel me to work things out with him on 50/50 custody, she kept insisting that giving him any overnights meant less child support money for many years and made my children to go through 3 grueling child custody assessments.

The children did not seem to be affected few years ago, but later I found out that they were deeply affected and were having self esteem issues from what I foolishly made them believe was abandonment by their father, as well as many problems learning at school and developed psycho-somatic problems like problems with speech and comprehension, emotional outbursts, fear of trusting people and making friends etc. I do not want to get into details but I feel horrible for what I put my ex and my children through for $150/week in child support money. A divorce lawyer should counsel her clients to do what is best for the children not be money hungry and destroy the lives of the children. Fitzpartick is not a good lawyer.”

FORMER CLIENT OF CATHERINE FITZPATRICK

Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick Alleged to Retaliate & File False Criminal Charges

Standard

Baby Judge Stealing Nose

( ACTUALLY JUDGE FITZPATRICK TRIED TO JAIL ME FOR 5 YEARS…  FALSELY…)

================================================

Quick Summary of Facts & Events:

================================================

  • 6/4/2013 Judge Fitzpatrick stripped me of my right to represent myself and appointed both a Guardian Ad Litem & a court appointed Lawyer in violation of:
    • my constitutional right to due process (14th Amendment, U.S. Contitution);
    • New Jersey Rules of Evidence 703; &
    • New Jersey Court Rule 5:3.

She issued a sua sponte order (on the courts own motion) without any evidence or testimony before the court supporting her order. She did not even give me the opportunity to cross-examine or present evidence before issuing the order.

THIS WAS UNLAWFUL AND JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT.

NOTABLY: in 4/2013 I won my last motion before the court and had my wife Margaret J. Wallace (of Gales Ferry CT) found in contempt & my unallocated support enforcement stayed… SO CLEARLY I WAS LEGALLY COMPETENT

NOTABLY: ACCORDING TO SETTLED CASE LAW IN NJ NO COURT COULD DEEM ME LEGALLY INCOMPETENT AFTER SUCCESFFULLY DEMONSTRATING COMPETENCE BEFORE THE COURT IN MY LAST MOTION – SEE KYLE V. VERONA GREEN ACRES   JUDGE FITZPATRICK IGNORED THIS BINDING PRECEDENT… THIS TOO WAS UNLAWFUL.

2. 8/14/2013 Judge Fitzparick apparently fabricated criminal charges against me

3. 8/16/2013 Judge Fitzpatrick apparently retaliated by sitting as a judge in my divorce and a now dismissed Domestic Violence case status hearing and order defaults in both cases on 8/16/2013 (see Mercer County Dockets:  FV-11-725-13K & FM-11-97-13B)

THIS WAS BOTH UNLAWFUL AND A VIOLATION OF COURT RULE 1:12:-1(g).

IMPORTANT: JUDGE FITZPATRICK’S ORDERS FOR DEFAULTS WERE LATER TREATED AS VOID COURT ORDERS AND VACATED – BECAUSE WHAT SHE DID WAS ILLEGAL.

JUDGE FITZPATRICK DID NOT DISCLOSE HER ATTEMPT TO FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST ME, AND SHE THEN SAT TO HEAR CIVIL CASES DESPITE THE FACT SHE FILED A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST ME AND WAS CONFLICTED

IMPORTANT: I was ordered to appear in civil court on 8/19/2013 for a Default hearing in the DV case FV-11-624-13. When I appeared I learned that my wife and her lawyer were told not to appear in court and I was arrested without new charges being filed, without a warrant, and without probable cause I apparently was kidnapped to shut me up

4. 8/18/2013 I WAS ARRESTED AT MY HOME. I POSTED BAIL AND WAS RELEASED FROM JAIL.

5. 8/19/2013 When I appeared I learned that my wife and her lawyer were told not to appear in court and I was arrested without new charges being filed, without a warrant, and without probable cause I apparently was kidnapped to shut me up.

  • There was no warrant for my 8/19/2013 Arrest
  • There was no criminal charges for the 8/19/2013 arrest
  • No Probable Cause was issued for the 8/19/2013 arrest
  • No criminal charges were filed for the 8/19/2103 arrest
  • IT ALL APPEARED TO BE RETALIATION TO SHUT ME UP AND TO KEEP JUDGE FITZPATRICK FROM GETTING IN TROUBLE.

6. In January of 2014 I recorded a phone call with my wife’s lawyer Jennifer Weisberg-Millner of Fox Rothschild. She revealed to me that Judge Fitzpatricks chambers called and told her not to appear in court on the morning  8/19/2013 because I’d been arrested. ODD BECAUSE I HADN’T BEEN ARRESTED IN THE MORNING OF 8/19/2013… ODD BECAUSE THE COURT NEVER CALLED ME TO TELL ME NOT TO COME IN… ODD BECAUSE THESE COMMUNICATIONS WERE EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS BY THE COURT WITH MY WIFE’S LAWYERS!

================================================

OTHER ISSUES FROM EARLY IN MY DIVORCE:

================================================

GAVEL DIVORCE

================================================

7.9/2011 My visitations with my children were converted to Supervised visits without a Plenary hearing. When I filed a motion in 9/2011 for Plenary hearing Judge Fitzpatrick refused to schedule the plenary hearing AS REQUIRED BY LAW. SHE ALSO REFUSED TO GIVE ME BACK MY UNSUPERVISED VISITATION.

8. 2011 The Supervised Visitation order was ridiculous it required my wife and me to agree on a supervisor… so my wife just continued to refuse to agree to use any supervisor I wanted to use and refused to pay for supervision. The result was I rarely saw my children for the next 2 years. This was devastating because my children were 2yrs old and 4yrs old at the time and I couldn’t hug, hold, and love them or the next 2 years on a regular basis. IT WAS ABSOLUTELY DEVASTATING AND I NEVER WAS GIVEN DUE PROCESS BY THE COURTS TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE.

9. Domestic Violence Charges by my wife appeared to abused by my wife to separate me from my children. In 2010 my wife filed a DV claim and it was dismissed and she admitted she had falsely stated facts in the complaint. She said I showed up unnannounced despite the fact I had texts from her inviting me to come see the children. Judge Fitzpatrick never held my wife accountable for these apparent lies.

10. In 2012 My wife filed another DV complaint. I was entitled to a hearing in 10 days. Instead Judge Fitzpatrick coordinated with Judge Warshaw and Judge Debello to prohibit a hearing on the DV complaint for over 240 days.

When the case was finally sent to Burlington County the new judge said the Temporary Restraining order Should have never been entered!!

11. Judge Fitzpatrick (or somebody using her user name) created FRAUDULENT COURT DOCUMENTS STATING MY DV CASE WAS 19 DAYS OLD WHEN IT WAS 240 DAYS OLD … THIS OBSCURED THE CASE FROM TRIAL ADMINISTRATORS SO THAT THEY COULD NOT INVESTIGATE WHY MY CASE WAS TAKING SO LONG.

======================================

SEE PROOF HERE:

======================================

12. The DV court order for temporary restraints did not require a psychiatric evalution. but the DV Judges Judge Debello and Judge Fitzpatrick said the would not schedule my hearing unless I went to a psychiatric evaluation (that I consented to go to in the divorce case). I told them I wouldn’t schedule it until the DV matter was handled.

  • JUDGE FITZPATRICK AND JUDGE DEBELLO UNLAWFULLY REFUSED TO SCHEDULE MY DV CASE WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE TRO AS REQUIRED BY N.J. LAW.
  • I researched the DV law and found that a DV case can only require a psych. eval if it is ordered as part of the TRO… In my case it was not!!
  • I told Both Judge Debello and Judge Fitzpatrick regardless of whether I was mentally ill or not it was irrelevant to whether or not I committed a crime, or committed an act of DV… so they needed to schedule the hearing. Additionally I reminded them there was no order for a psych eval in the DV case… THEY IGNORED MY MOTIONS AND LETTERS.
  • MY DV CASE WASN’T HEARD FOR OVER 425 DAYS, WHEN IT WAS HEARD IT WAS DISMISSED BY THE NEW JUDGE!!!
    I WENT OVER A YEAR WITHOUT SEEING MY KIDS BECAUSE THE COURT DENIED ME DUE PROCESS, VIOLATED THE DV LAWS, AND RETALIATED AGAINST ME!

PROOF & EVIDENCE JUDGE FITZPATRICK FRAUDULENTLY MARKED MY CASE AS 19 DAYS OLD WHEN IT WAS 245 DAYS OLD:

CLICK LINK ABOVE TO SEE DETAILS

==========================================================

ALLEGATIONS AGAINST FOX ROTHSCHILD ATTORNEYS INCLUDE:

==========================================================

Note: My wife was represented by Fox Rothschild. They are professional lawyers, but they litigate with a win at all costs strategy that appears to be ignorant of due-process for their client or adversaries.

Jennifer-Weisberg Millner – a lawyer for over 20 years surely should have known that the submissions by my wife of altered evidence were not admissible in court and that submitting such documents was unethical… but she was complicit with it.

Eliana Baer – Testified to false facts on 12/5/2012 by stating I had sent my wife over 12 emails in a single day.. This was a flat out lie and Elaina Baer never submitted any evidence to substantiate this claim. This was unethical and despite my numerous discovery requests Elaina Baer never submitted 12 emails sent in a single day… she lied.

Jennifer Weisber Millner (Jennifer Millner) should have known that both her clients due-process rights and my due process rights were violated for the over 425 days that the DV case wasn’t scheduled, but she allowed it to happen without ever motioning the court for justice or adherence to the court rules.

Jennifer-Weisberg Millner & Eliana Baer have both been lawyers long enough to know that the sua sponte order Judge Fitzpatrick issued to strip me of my right to represent myself was unlawful and a violation of court rules, yet they were complicit with it.

==========================================================

CONCLUSION

==========================================================

1. In the end all of this will cost my wife and I much more time and money to resolve, which only benefits these slimy lawyers from Fox Rothschild.

2. I reported all of my concerns to the A.C.J.C. for Judicial Misconduct, Judge Glenn Grant – Acting Administrator of the Courts, Judge Mary C. Jacobson, etc… all of them just worked to cover this up, even after my cases were transferred to Burlington County where the retaliation continued under Judge John Tomassello who continued to violate my rights and retaliate for Judge Fitzptrick

3. Judge Tomasello is a total scumbag in my opinion. He actually took ex-parte testimony during the divorce trial and refused to allow me to cross-examine the witnesses he did this with. he also along with Judge Bookbinder prohibited me from appearing in court for my own trial dates on 2/18/2014 and 2/19/2014… THIS WAS ALSO UNLAWFUL AND MEANS MY FINAL ORDER FOR DIVORCE IS NOW VOID AND I HAVE TO GO BACK TO COURT FOR MORE TRIAL DATES JUST TO GET JUSTICE THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BY LAW AND BY COURT RULES.

MOST IMPORTANTLY HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE:

N.J. FAMILY COURT IS CORRUPT & INCOMPETENT – THE JUDGES FEEL THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW AND THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE BEST INTERESTS OF YOUR CHILDREN.

ALL THEY WANT TO DO IS HELP THEIR FRIENDS IN THE LOCAL BAR ASSOCIATION FLEECE YOU FOR ALL YOUR MONEY AND THEN ISSUE COURT ORDERS THAT WILL KEEP YOU DESTITUTE AND UNABLE TO HIRE A LAWYER TO GET JUSTICE.

==============================================

CLEARLY THESE PEOPLE MUST NOT UNDERSTAND THEIR OATHS OF OFFICE

…. PERHAPS THEY ARE CONFUSED???

==============================================

Robbing Justice

JENNIFER MILLNER / ELAINA BAER / FOX ROTHSCHILD ARE UNTHICAL AND ALLEGED TO STEAL MONEY FROM ESCROW ACCOUNTS

Standard

Lawyer Lying

=================================================================

HERE IS A SHORT SUMMARY OF

UNETHICAL AND/OR APPARENTLY ILLEGAL THINGS JENNIFER MILLNER AND FOX ROTHSCHILD HAVE DONE TO CREATE CONTENTIOUS LITIGATION

 =================================================================

FOX ROTHSCHILD DOES NOT APPEAR TO CARE ABOUT ITS CLIENTS OR THEIR CHILDREN, THEY ARE TYPICAL LAWYERS THEY APPEAR TO CARE ONLY ABOUT BILLABLE HOURS

DANA JANQUITTO, ESQ  (of Reed Smith)- A FORMER LAW CLERK ALSO GET’S DISHONORABLE MENTION FOR:

HER PARTICIPATION IN ORCHESTRATING A VIOLATION OF A COURT ORDER ISSUED BY THE JUDGE SHE WORKED FOR… SHE ACTUALLY HELPED MY WIFE VIOLATE A COURT ORDER – WITHOUT NOTIFYING THE OPPOSING PARTY OF HER EX-PARTE CONTACT!

SEE DETAILS BELOW:

===========================================================================

MY EXPERIENCE WITH FOX ROTHSCHILDS UNETHICAL OR ILLEGAL TACTICS:

===========================================================================

(this is an edited excerpt from an email sent to Fox Rothschild, my expectation is that they will NEVER directly address their conduct unless I sue them)

To: Eric Sotoloff (Fox Rothschild):

1. Jennifer Millner stole my money from her escrow accountand didn’t provide simultaneous statements – that is theft by deception and the statute of limitations hasn’t run out.

SEE NARRATIVE & SOURCE DOCUMENTS HERE ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB:
https://njcourtcorruption.com/2014/06/22/jennifer-weisberg-millner-jennifer-millner-alleged-to-be-a-thief/

OR SEE ATTACHMENTS WHICH DOCUMENT THE THEFT OF MY MONEY

NOTE: THE LINK TO THE NEWS BLOG ABOVE HAS BEEN READ ON 4 CONTINENTS NOW.

2. Fox Rothschild Conspired with InsiderScore and O’Donnell Newsome to make a false claim on a wages settlement of (gross) $50,000 from InsiderScore. I now have evidence of that. Eric I presume you were involved given that you used to work at O’Donnell Newsome and InsiderScore ironically retained them after Elaina Baer tortuously interferred in my settlement and had it frozen by the court ONLY AFTER YOUR FIRM CONVINCED INSIDERSCORE TO VIOLATE THE CONTRACT

3. Fox Rothschild Retained Dr. Scasta in 2011and didn’t disclose that conflict when Dr. Scasta was appointed to Wallace v. Syphrett in 2013… This was unethical. Shockingly Dr. Scasta didn’t reveal this conflict either, which is simply more evidence that the Mercer County Bar Association and the Courts are corrupt.

 4. Jennifer Millner allowed Judge Tomasello to violate the due process rights of my wife, my children, and myself in a manner that will lead us all back to court, and sadly generate more money for Fox Rothschild, unless my wife (copied to this email) finally get’s smart and realizes she can sue you for malpractice and pain and suffering along with me.  And yes I call her my wife because the Divorce Decree is Void.

5. Fox Rothschild admitted ALTERED EVIDENCE – TEXTS WITH WHITEOUT ALL OVER THEM AND DELETED MESSAGES TO OBTAIN A TRO, ELAINA BAER THEN FABRICATED TESTIMONY AS A WITNESS ON 12/4/2012…. THIS WILL BE REPORTED AND PUBLISHED. THE PUBLIC NEEDS TO KNOW HOW CORRUPT YOUR FIRM IS SO THAT MORE CHILDREN DON’T GET HURT BY YOUR LITIGATION TACTICS FOR PROFIT.  WHAT YOU DO IS NOTHING MORE THAN CHILD TRAFFICKING AND ITS ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING.  I HAVE THE SOURCE DOCUMENTS AND THE FAXES YOU SENT TO COURT WITH THE ALTERED EVIDENCE AND THE CONFLICTING NARRATIVE.

6. MY BANKRUPTCY PRE-EMPTS YOUR COLLECTION OF LEGAL FEES: Fox Rothschild Motioned for me to pay my wife’s legal fees even though I had the contingent liability DISCHARED IN BANKRUPTCY IN 2012… THIS WAS UNETHICAL AND RESULTED IN A VOID COURT ORDER FOR ME TO PAY YOU $100,000 OF MY WIFES $400,000 BILL…. YOU IDIOTS… THE FEDERAL COURT HAS ALREADY BARRED YOU FROM COLLECTING – SEE ATTACHED BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE.

7. Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick Admitted on the Record that Jennifer Millner arranged an illegal / violation of a court order for my wife in 2011 when my wife entered my house without consent, and had the sheriff’s department come in as well for illegal search and seizure of marital property!  This is now documented online and in the court record! My wife was found in contempt because Jennifer Millner and Judge Fitzpatrick’s Chambers consulted ex-parte to have Sheriff’s Enter my home… this alone is a $100,000 lawsuit (tolled thanks to my late discovery of the Sheriff’s side of the story).

Note: the Unlawful Violation of a Court order resulting in the unauthorized  entrance into my home in 2011 was arranged via a call from Jennifer Weisberg-Millner (Jennifer Millner) to Dana Janquitto, Esq (Former Law Clerk to Catherine Fitzpatrick). My presumption is that Dana Janquitto is now working at Reed Smith (www.reedsmith.com) and possibly is a dangerous lawyer because she has demonstrated she works without good ethics.

CLOSING THOUGHTS

MAYBE SOMEDAY JENNIFER MILLNER AND HER ASSOCIATES WILL DECIDE TO MAKE A MORE HONEST LIVING.

IF THEY DO MAYBE IT’LL LOOK SOMETHING LIKE THIS:

Ex Lawyer - Million Dollars

Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick & Alleged Cronyism

Standard

 Crony King

==================================================================

HERE IS A SHORT STORY OF APPARENT CRONYISM IN THE COURTS:

==================================================================

JUDGE FITZPATRICK’S OLD BOSS TOOK A JOB WITH HER HUSBANDS FIRM RIGHT AFTER SHE WAS PROMOTED TO PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE FAMILY PART.

A lot of Lawyers here in Mercer county have commented that my divorce Judge Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick became a presiding judge of the Family part incredibly quickly.

One lawyer John Hartmann revealed that she got the job because her husband was a high profile attorney for Stark & Stark. (John Hartmann is Judge Fitzpatrick’s cousin-in law.. Husbands Cousin).

Well for me the story was too compelling not to investigate – it ended with some tragic discoveries:

Story of the Presumed Judge Quid Pro Quo that bought Fitzpatrick’s Job:

1. Judge Fitzpatrick became a Judge in 2009 she became presiding judge of the Family Part in March 2010 (wow fast right).

2. Her husband is John Sakson of Stark & Stark.

3. Judge Smithison Retired (Former Presiding Judge of the Family Part) about March 2010 and took a Job at Stark & Stark (working for Judge Fitzpatrick’s Husband).

Note:

(a)Judge Smithison allowed his wife to sit on a jury as an alternate juror – the ACJC took no action but sent a letter telling him he shouldn’t do that! A wrist slap for misconduct was appropriate for the A.C.J.C. judicial disciplinary committee, because their job is primarily to cover up judicial misconduct rather than investigate it.

(b) Judge Smithison decided the Megan’s Law Case (he’s got juice).

4. Judge Fitzpatrick worked under Judge Andrew Smithison who was the presiding judge of the FP in 2009

5. THE SHOCKER: My wife’s attorney Jennifer Millner worked as a law clerk in the 80s for none other than Judge Smithison

Note Judge Fitzpatrick & Jennifer Millner also serve on a committee of the Mercer County Bar Association (Bench-Bar Committee). They actually discussed agenda items during my hearings and stated they would continue ex-parte discussions about issues related to my case at the Bench Bar’s next meeting.

Opinion:

It’s hard to have respect for a court system that runs on cronyism at the expense of the appearance of justice and integrity of the system.

Obviously the Judges and Lawyers do not place much emphasis on the appearance of justice or integrity, because if they did, stories like this would not be so common and not go un-investigated or reported.

This is just a small example of how our Judiciary has become the 3rd Branch of Government to fail the people. We are akin to prisoners of our own government than participants in it due to cronyism like this.

I’ve lost all respect for New Jersey and American Government, I really don’t believe the government officials care about anything else but fleecing their victims / ascending on the backs of honest poor people.

================================

Summary & Conclusion:

================================

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

================================

My wife’s lawyer and my judge both worked for Smithson.

My Judge probably bought her position from Smithson in exchanged for giving him a no show job, around the same time Judge Jacobson was promoted to Assignment Judge – so she kept her mouth shut and probably owes Fitzpatrick a favor for that too.

Presumably: Everybody in my case was related via money or favors except for me lol.

Presumably: It follows / is likely that Judge Smithison traded favors for a Job at Stark and Stark that resulted in a unqualified lawyer Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick (per comments from her own clients) lawyer to become the Presiding Judge of the Family Part purely for political considerations and quid-pro quo favors to her old boss Judge Smithson.

Isn’t that quaint…

Very Truly,

A plebeian scumbag & Victim of Legal Cronyism

Serfs hoe

 

Alleged Judicial Misconduct of Judge Bookbinder

Standard

deviljudge

Quick Summary – Punchline:

CLICK LINK BELOW TO SEE COURT ORDER – EVIDENCE OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT:

RONALD BOOKBINDER’S COURT ORDERS VIOLATE THE LAW 2/6/2014 – 3/10/2014 – HE REFUSED TO PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE SUPPORTING HIS DECISION (CLICK TO READ COURT ORDERS)

JUDGE RONALD E. BOOKBINDER’S ILLEGAL COURT ORDERS VIOLATE:

  • THE U.S. CONSTITUTION,
  • N.J. CONSTITUTION,
  • SUPREME COURT RULINGS:
  • BINDING PRECEDENTS OF FEDERAL 3RD CIRCUIT
  • JUDGE BOOKBINDER IS ALLEGED TO HAVE ABUSED HIS OFFICE FOR THE PURPOSES OF BULLYING A SELF-REPRESENTED FATHER
  • JUDGE BOOKBINDER VIOLATED THIS FATHER’S RIGHTS AND EFFECTIVELY SABATAGED THE FATHERS ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN HIS OWN TRIAL FOR CUSTODY OF THE FATHER’S OWN CHILDREN.
  • JUDGE JOHN TOMASELL AND JUDGE JOHN CALL WERE COMPLICIT IN THE VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION AT TRIAL IN FM-03-790-14:
    • Judge Tomasello held trial without the Defendant present, took testimony from the Plaintiff, and refused to allow the Defendant to cross-examine the Plaintiff
    • Judge Tomasello refused to hear the Defendant’s immediate appeal (a statutory right of the Defendant) in FV-03-1154-14
    • Judge John Call was the complicit presiding (Supervising) judge.

================================================

EVIDENCE OF JUDGE BOOKBINDER’S JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

(supported by Judge John Call & Judge John Tomasello):

===================================================

RONALD BOOKBINDER’S COURT ORDERS VIOLATE THE LAW 2/6/2014 – 3/10/2014 – HE REFUSED TO PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE SUPPORTING HIS DECISION (CLICK TO READ COURT ORDERS)

1. A Father ((Self-Represented / Pro Se litigant) prohibited from appearing in court for his own Trial!   THIS IS A VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO ACCESS THE COURTS.

2. Father (Self Represented / Pro Se Litigant) prohibited from meeting with Ombudsman to discuss his concerns.

  • This order was issued ex-parte with no notice & no hearing to the Father (no due process)
  • Order was only put in writing after the Father confronted Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder

3. Father (Self Represented / Pro Se Litigant) subjected to illegal court order that violated U.S. Supreme Court Decisions in Haines v. Kerner that permit a pro-se litigant to file pleadings contrary to court rules and procedures.

4. Father (Self Represented / Pro Se Litigant) Prohibited from viewing his own divorce files by court order

5. Judge Bookbinder  appears to have committed felony witness tampering in in State v. Syphrett System #03-2950-01 by admitting he consulted privately with a witness in State v. Syphrett about the case prior to the trial. He allowed the witness Judge Mary C. Jacobson to recommend bail conditions and civil restraints against Mr. Syphrett (the case was ultimately dismissed without any trial via highly unusual ex-parte motion by Prosecutor Joseph Bocchini of Mercer County).

 

===============================================

HOW THE LAW WAS VIOLATED BY JUDGE BOOKBINDER

===============================================

Fingers Crossed Oath

===============================================

After having my civil and criminal cases transferred to Burlington because Judges in Mercer County violated my rights, the apparent retaliation by judges continued in Burlington County via all manner of strange happenings.

1. Judge Bookbinder Consulted the Mercer County Judges despite the fact that Judge Mary C. Jacobson, Judge Pedro Jimenez, and Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick had been recused from my cases. THIS WAS BIZARRE!

2. Judge Bookbinder issued civil restraints against my access of the court without presenting any evidence to support these restraints. This was a violation of the law of the land per U.S. Supreme Court: Elrod v. Burns (1976)

See here where Elrod v. Burns clearly states that the government can not restrain a citizen’s 1st Amendment free speech without producing a burden of proof… Judge Bookbinder ignored this and acted as a tyrant rather than a Judge – in doing so he acted without subject matter jurisdiction.

=========================================================

LEGAL DECISIONS SUPPORTING MY ALLEGATIONS:

 Court Order Judge

=========================================================

  • Judge Bookbinder’s Violation of Supreme Courts Law (Elrod v. Burns & Haines v. Kerner) – Click Underlined Links to read:
    • NOTE THE U.S. SUPREME COURT FINDINGS IN  Elrod v. Burns, 427 US 347 – 1976 pursuant Buckley v. Valeo:

“Though First Amendment rights are not absolute, they may be curtailed only by interests of vital importance, the burden of proving the existence of which rests upon the government”

“Though First Amendment rights are not absolute, they may be curtailed only by interests of vital importance, the burden of proving the existence of which rests upon the government”

Haines v. Kerner Specifically States the Following:

“We cannot say with assurance that under the allegations of the pro se complaint, which we hold to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers, it appears ‘beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.’ Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41,45 46 (1957). See Dioguardi v. Durning, 139 F.2d 774 (CA2 1944)”

JUDGE BOOKBINDER SHOWED CONTEMPT FOR THE U.S. SUPREME COURT AND DECIDED HIS COUNTY COURT WAS ABOVE THE SUPREME COURT RULING – THIS VIOLATES THE LAW OF THE LAND!

=========================================================

EVIDENCE OF

THE ALLEGED JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT & ALLEGED FELONIES:

=========================================================

Magnify Glass FACTS

=========================================================

Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder issued a court order on 2/6/2014 and others which prohibited a father from appearing in court for the father’s own divorce, custody litigation!

THIS WAS A VIOLATION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION 14TH AMENDMENT.

SEE COURT ORDERS HERE:

2014-02-06 and 14-2-19 and 14-3-10 COURT ORDERS BOOKBINDER

List of Illegal Aspects of these Court Orders:

1. Pro Se Defendant prohibited from appearing in court without EXPRESS PERMISSION of a Superior Court Judge (Regardless of whether the Defendant had a trial date)!!

2.Pro Se Defendant prohibited from filing contrary to the court rules, even though U.S. Supreme Court and Third Circuit of Federal Court has issued precedent setting decisions that state a Pro Se Defendant need not follow the court rules or follow court procedures in pleadings or filings. See Decisions in:

  • Third Circuit Binding Precedents – Clearly Make Judge Bookbinder’s Court orders illegal / Void
      • In Picking: the plaintiffs civil rights was 150 pages and described by a federal judge as “inept.” Nevertheless, it was held: Where a plaintiff pleads pro-se in a suit for protection of civil rights, the court should endeavor to construe plaintiffs pleading without regard to technicalities.     (
    • Todaro v. Bowman, 872 F.2d 43, 44 n. 1, 3d Cir. 1989 (Click this Link):
      • Findings of Todaro Court:  As a pro se litigant Todaro is held to less stringent pleading standards and we will afford him a liberal interpretation of our procedural rules. We will, therefore, consider the first amendment claim as properly before us. (iv) McTeague v. Sosnowski, 617 F.2d 1016, 1019 (3d Cir.1980).

 

===================================================

ABOUT JUDGE RONALD E. BOOKBINDER:

===================================================

Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder has a reputation in Burlington County for being a gregarious, even tempered Judge, with a keen mind for Municipal Ordinances and Laws.

I don’t Dispute that.

However: I have seen Judge Ronald Bookbinder apparently commit crimes of Official Misconduct (a felony) and violate his oath of office and the United States Constitution.

 

===================================================

CONCLUSION:

===================================================

I am a first person witness to a Superior Court Judge of New Jersey deciding that he is ABOVE THE LAW

I have witnessed Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder show complete disrespect for U.S. Supreme Court rulings, the Constitution, court rules, and “THE LAW”.

Everybody who reads this blog and views these court orders is now also a witness to the fact that Judge Bookbinder has diminished the integrity of the court and violated his oath of Office.

 The End Loonie Toons

 

 

Father’s Rights & Constitution Trampled by NJ Courts in 2011

Standard


FCLUlogoB2

Tyrannical New Jersey Family Court Judge Terrorizes Good Father

Posted by Bruce Eden President FCLU.org

… the wife, an Austrian national, came to the US, got her college degree and CPA license. Almost immediately his wife filed a domestic violence restraining order claiming he harassed and threatened her. A copy of her personal diary in July of 2009 shows that she was “going to so f–cking divorce him, that she was going to so f–cking make him suffer for the rest of his life”.

 

Immediately after filing the restraining order, the children would not go home to the mother and went back to the father. The mother followed them to the father, breaking her own restraining order. Thewife confronted the father’s 73-year old mother and told his motherif she goes near the children again she (wife) would kill her. The children’s grandmother filed for a restraining order against the wife. That’s when the wife began “piling on” the charges against the father. That’s also about the same time the wife was given an attorney by the NJ Battered Womens Services, who the wife went to see for aid and assistance. However, this attorney, Christian Van Pelt, of Cedar Knolls, was ineligible to practice law at the time, because he failed to pay his annual fee for the NJ Clients Protection Trust Fund. Every paper filed by her lawyer was done while the lawyer was practicing law without a license. No matter.

 

The wife stalked the father in June 2011 because the children went back to the father’s place. When the father put the children in the car to take them back to the mother, the mother hiding her car behind some large bushes pulled out in front of the father’s car at the bottom of the driveway. The father jammed on his brakes and slid into her car. She then charged him with violating a restraining order even though she was stalking the father, and then charged him with assault by auto.

 

When the father attempted to file for a restraining order against the wife, he went before the same New Jersey domestic violence judge, Thomas Critchley, JSC that granted the wife’s restraining orders and subsequent FRO violations. It goes without saying that Morris County, NJ Judge Critchley was biased against the father and dismissed the father’s domestic violence complaint.

 

The mother grabbed the children and then began moving into the battered women’s shelters and received taxpayer-funded food stamps, stipends, cash, and even housing. Yet, the father cannot get a restraining order against the mother with valid proof. This is taxpayer fraud where battered women’s services abuse the funding to damage and destroy families, and men cannot get one dime of funding for battered men’s services through government funding. This constitutes a major civil rights violation in New Jersey and the rest of the United States.

 

The mother filed multiple violations of restraining orders against the father, keeping the children away from the father. The children e-mailed, texted and called the father’s sister and paternal grandmother telling them what shelter they were in, that they weren’t being fed properly, and that they were not going to school. The paternal grandmother would bring food and cellphones to the children because the mother kept taking them away from the children.

 

Finally the mother alleged that the father had appeared at a shelter and filed for contempt of the restraining order.The wife’s lawyer filed orders to show cause to cut the father completely off from the children, and jail him indefinitely while the wife would be granted her divorce by default and gain sole custody of the children with no visitation. The father got wind of this and filed a Federal Notice of Removal and Petition on September 2, 2011.

 

He filed the Federal Removal action to remove the entire state case into Federal Court in the morning of the 2nd and deprive the state of further jurisdiction of the cases. Judge Critchley and the matrimonial judge, Catherine Enright, JSC ignored the Federal removal petition, even though they acknowledged its existence in transcripts and in orders. Once the Removal occurred the state court judges were without jurisdiction to proceed.

 

But proceed they did. They deprived the father of his children. Judge Critchley also put out a fraudulent civil Arrest Warrant for Peter Bresko, who was arrested 4 days later–4 days after the state case had been removed to Federal Court, depriving the state court judges of all jurisdiction. However, Judge Critchley has jailed Bresko on a civil contempt and told Bresko that he would be released when the judge felt like it. The judge told Bresko he was going to allow the mother to leave the state with the children and set up residence in a New England state, where they have a corresponding battered womens shelter. Judge Critchley has called Bresko into court from jail several times demanding all kinds of compliance from Bresko that Bresko cannot comply with while in jail. Critchley has ordered, though not in writing, that he wants Bresko psychiatrically evaluated. He told Bresko to tell him who helped him write legal papers since Bresko is representing himself, after Critchley threatened his former attorney. He wants Bresko to turn over the diary implicating the wife. The diary is evidence of mitigating circumstances that would exonerate Bresko of the bogus domestic violence charges. Bresko has been asserting his Fifth Amendment Rights as explained in Miranda v. Arizona where he can assert those rights even in civil proceedings. He has told Judge Critchley he has no authority and must release him because the Federal Removal occurred prior to the Arrest Warrant issuance and Bresko’s arrest 4 days later.

 

Judge Critchley is a judge out of control and dangerous to society. He was a former domestic violence prosecutor that is now a domestic violence judge. He has become an ideologue for the radical domestic violence coalitions, which constitutes a conflict of interest since he was promoted because of his assistance to the battered womens services of NJ. Judge Critchley has even filed his own Order to Show Cause against Bresko, stepping down off the bench and becoming Bresko’s adversary and prosecutor. Judges cannot be a judge and prosecutor in a case. It is a serious judicial misconduct violation. But Critchley believes he is above the law and continues to hold Bresko in jail for almost 40 days without Due Process or right to be released on bail.

 

Bresko’s sister hired an attorney to get him out on the criminal issues, and that attorney is too intimidated by the judge. A new, young attorney was just hired and Critchley threatened to throw that attorney in jail for contempt for defending Bresko vigorously. Judge Critchley is a rogue judge that must be removed from the bench, have his state judicial pension revoked, and be subjected to psychiatric treatment. Anyone who can, they need to call the New Jersey Governor’s Office and also Judge Critchley’s chambers in Morris County Courthouse, Morristown, New Jersey to demand that this fascist judge immediately release Bresko and demand Critchley resign afterwards.