Tag Archives: Fox Rothschild

THE END FOR AN UNLAWFUL JUDGE – It Looks Like This!

Standard

 

LETTER TO ASSIGNMENT JUDGE RONALD E. BOOKBINDER

SENT AFTER HE ATTEMPTED TO PROHIBIT A DEFENDANT FROM:

APPEARING  IN COURT FOR HIS OWN TRIAL, VIA

UNLAWFUL COURT ORDERS

 

 

SEE THE FAXED LETTER AND FAX RECEIPTS TO ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT (A.C.J.C.)

ADMINISRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS (A.O.C.) AND THE SUPERIOR COURT HERE:

2014-10-10 – LTR to Bookbinder ACJC AOC Goodbye

10/10/2014

Derek C. Syphrett, Esq.

Pro se litigant (Defendant)

252 Fountayne Ln,

Lawrence Township, NJ 08648

VIA U.S. MAIL & FACSIMILE BY THIRD PARTY PERSONS

Family Division Clerk, Suasan Fortino, Judge Bookbinder, John Tomasello, John Call, Judge Covert, Sharyn Sherman, Law Clerks for the Judges named herein.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part (Burlington County)

49 Rancocas Rd

Mount Holly, NJ 08060

RE: Bischoff v. Syphrett

Docket No.: FV-03-1154-14 – DIQUALIFICATION OF TRIAL JUDGES

 

 

Dear Judge Bookbinder:

I am writing the court (not you) to further propound upon the court my demands for justice, pursuant my right to petition my government for redress of grievances, as secured by the People of New Jersey, pursuant the New Jersey State Constitution of 1947, and pursuant my right to communicate in the interests of Justice as an attorney-in-fact (citation: Hawkins v. Harris, 141 N.J. 207 (1995): see courts findings which provide legal foundation supporting my judicial litigation privileges)

I wanted to follow-up on the Status Conference of 10/7/2014, to address your offer to allow me to “Judge Shop” and choose to have the Judge of my choice hear my petitions for redress of grievances (my motions papers generally) with regard to FV-03-1154-14 (only).

Please be advised that I decline your request to participate in any form of “Judge Shopping”, because the offer and the concept itself is offensive and disrespectful to the courts, the litigants, the public trust, and the institution of the Superior Court itself.

 

deviljudge

SEE SOME OF THE UNLAWFUL, NULL & VOID COURT ORDERS HERE:

2014-02-06 and 2014-2-19 and 2014-3-10 COURT ORDERS BOOKBINDER

TO BE CLEAR:

 

My concern about either yourself or John Tomasello attempting to adjudicate my legal matters is borne from my desire to enforce litigant’s rights for the legal person(s) I represent (myself and all other legal persons that I, in fact, am). My concern is that both John Tomasello and yourself have ceased to be Neutral third parties in due to a multitude of actions each of you have voluntarily chosen to engage in, which are clearly contrary to the law, rules-of-law, the state constitution, the federal constitution, my civil rights, and the interests of justice generally. BOTH YOURSELF AND JOHN TOMASELLO ARE ALREADY DISQUALIFIED BY RULE FROM HEARING MY MATTERS PURSUANT THE JUDICIAL CANONS AND MANDATORILY BINDING COMMON-LAW OF THIS JURISDICTION (WHETHER IT BE JUDICIALLY NOTICED OR NOT).

I say the above because the facts, testimony, process, etc that is already before the court 100%, clearly and convincingly support my position that your offending court orders of: 2/6/2014, 2/19/2014, 4/1/2014, 9/12/2014, and others are in fact null and void.

 

 

Court Order Judge

AGAIN: I REQUEST YOU TAKE NOTICE OF THE COMMON-LAW IN TOTO, AND SPECIFICALLY INCLUSIVE OF THE DOCTRINE OF “THE LAW OF THE VOIDS”

    1. The common-law right to attack a court order that is null & void ab initio remains inviolate. As such I assert that the final order in FV-03-1154-14 is NULL & VOID ab inito. Further I assert the orders of Judge Bookbinder dated 2/6/2014, and 2/19/2014 are both Null & Void, and that they represent acts of extrinsic fraud, in that they purport to interfere with the appearance of a witness-of-fact (The Defendant). Such orders may be attacked at any time and are not time barred. They may be legally attacked directly at the trial court and/or collaterally in any court with jurisdiction over the matter.
    1. SEE THE FOLLOWING LEGAL ARGUMENTS AND LEGAL FOUNDATIONS SUPPORTING MY CHALLENGE TO THE FINAL COURT ORDER AS A CHALLENGE DIRECTED AT ANY AND ALL NULL & VOID COURT ORDERS AFFECTING MY LEGAL INTERESTS:
    1. The law is well-settled that a void order or judgment is void even before reversal. Take Judicial Notice of:

      1. Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co.,254 U.S. 348, 41 S.Ct. 116 (1920)

      1. Excerpts from “The Valley Supreme Court:

“Courts are constituted by authority and they cannot go beyond that power delegated to them. If they act beyond that authority, and certainly in contravention of it, their judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void, and this even prior to reversal.”

      1. Boyd v. United 116 U.S. 616 : Justice Bradley said:

“It is the duty of the courts to be watchful for the Constitutional Rights of the Citizens…”

      1. Gomillion v. Lightfoot 364 U.S. 155:

“Constitutional Rights would be of little value if they could be indirectly denied.”

 

      1. Norton v. Shelby County 118 U.S. 425:

“An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”

      1. In Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall stated:

“the very purpose of the written constitution is to ensure that the government officials, including Judges, do not depart from the documents fundamental principles”.

 

0001910cba29056841e3b2e8ca7f16074ab

CONCLUSION:

 

For some not fully transparent, but yet apparent reason: it appears that you and your colleagues have attempted to obstruct justice in an unlawful manner with regard to my legal affairs and my communications with the court and third parties.

THIS WAS A BAD IDEA (MEANING STUPID). I am not the sort of man who should be trifled with by people or persons who have financial assets or lifestyles they wish to maintain at the status quo. I say this not to threaten or scare you, but to emphasize my firm and appropriate position that I will endeavor in any and all civil and lawful manners to hold those who transgress my children, my property, or my rights fully accountable to the law, or at a minimal: I will always endeavor to ensure that those who violate my personal rights or those of my children will be forever discouraged from doing so EVER again, by standing up for my rights in a civil, lawful manner, pursuant the interests of Justice.

TO BE CLEAR: I am not an intolerable jerk, BUT I CAN BE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE… I CAN BE AS BIG OF A JERK AS THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE REQUIRE, AND I HAVE NO PROBLEM TAKING THAT POSITION IF/WHEN IT SERVES THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE.

FURTHER:

The history of people who’ve doubted my legal skill, and/or my professional skill is a very sad story. They do not fair well generally, because ultimately my success leads to their downfall and scrutiny of their peers. I am a very thoughtful person, and so when I speak or interact with the court it is ALWAYS PURPOSEFUL AND DESIGNED TO CREATE JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND AN END RESULT THAT IS IN FACT AND LAW: JUST.

Please also take some solace in the fact that while you have offended me and my family in a very personal manner, my dispute with you is not “personal”. I don’t care about you, or your family, your thoughts, your dreams, your aspirations, your retirement, your occupation etc. It’s just not something I want to concern myself with.

In fact if it were not for your awful conduct as a Judge I believe I could enjoy pleasant conversation with you and a few cocktails at a local eatery. At times you can seem to be a fairly enjoyable personality. However, as a Judge in my matters, you are a distraction, intolerable, and you’ve violated the law. For these reasons alone – I can not abide you handling of my legal affairs a second longer (Please see my writ of coram Nobis for details of my concerns and my legal rights to banish you from this case).

FURTHER: IT HAS NEVER MADE SENSE FOR BOTH JOHN TOMASELLO AND FOR YOU TO CO-DEPENDENTLY SERVE AS TRIERS OF FACT IN FV-03-1154-14… IT OFFENDS ALL MANNER JUDICIAL INDPENDENCE TO HAVE TWO JUDGES ACTIVELY HEARING THE MATTER, WITHOUT BOTH BEING PRESENT TO HEAR PRESENTMENT OF FACTS, TESTIMONY, OR MOTION PAPERS!!!

LASTLY: MY OFFICIAL POSITION IS YOUR COURT ORDERS DO NOT EXIST:

Please be advised that Your Court Orders and those of John Tomasello in FV-03-1154-14, FM-03-790-14, FV-03-1162-14, LITERALLY DO NOT EXIST IN THE CORPUS JURIS (THE BODY OF LAW)

I officially provide you this letter as legal notice that the orders are null and void, the aforementioned court orders: confer no rights; it impose no duties; affords no protection; creates no office; they are in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed … THEY DO NOT EXIST TO ME. FURTHER I WILL NOT CONSENT TO FURTHER HEARINGS BEFORE YOU AS YOU ARE LAWFULLY DISQUALIFIED AS OF 2/6/2014, WHEN YOU ACTED SUA SPONTE AS AN ADVERSE PARTY TO THE DEFENDANT AND THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE BY IMPEDEING THE LEGAL PROCESS UNNECESSARILY AND CONTRARY TO THE LAW AS CITED IN MY WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS.

SO WITH THAT I SAY, HAVE A NICE LIFE AND BEGONE. IF I SEE YOU AGAIN I WILL MOST ASSUREDLY ARREST YOU AND PROSECUTE AS IS MY RIGHT IN NEW JERSEY UNDER THE LAW AND COURT RULE 1:21 et seq.

Kind regards,

Derek Syphrett

Pro se Defendant

P.S. PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS VIA INTEROFFICE MAIL UPON THE UNIFIED COURTS RECEIPT OF THE THIS LETTER.

cc: Judge Glenn Grant

cc: Administraive Office of the Courts (Appropriate Person Overseeing the Compliance with the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act)

cc: Michelle Smith Clerk of the Court

cc: Chief Justice Rabner

cc: Justice Albin

cc: Plaintiff – Kathryn Bischoff (the woman who never refuted or replied to my pleadings that she lied to obtain a FRO, delivered via Court Clerk, pursuant DV Procedural Manual)

 

For more background on the UNLAWFUL ISSUES ENDURED BY THIS MAN IN NEW JERSEY SUPERIOR COURT (FAMILY COURT) READ MR. SYPHRETT WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS HERE.

 

Note a Writ of Coram Nobis is a ancient common-law writ that has origins in Chancery Courts. The New Jersey Family Court is still a Chancery Court, sitting within a Chancery Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey, as such it is totally appropriate to file a Writ of Coram Nobis as of a Common Law right to Demand the correction of court errors of fact. Further Pursuant Court Rule 4:50 it is our well-researched (non-legal opinion) that within 1-year of a FINAL JUDGEMENT,  a motion for NEW TRIAL may be appropriate if a litigants rights were violated through no fault of that litigant, and/or over that litigants objections to the same at trial.

 

SEE THE WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS HERE:

2014-10-07 – FV-03-1154-14 Derek Writ Coram Nobis

IT IS SCATHING AND HILARIOUSLY RUDE TO THE JUDGES WHO LIED!

(IT CONTAINS MANY GRAMMAR ERROS, AND WILL BE AMENDED)

 

 

 

PickPocket and Loose Women

…  AND  …

 

The End Loonie Toons

Judge Peter Warshaw – THIS ISN’T DOMESTIC VIOLENCE!!!

Standard

DV TEXT ALTERED

ABOVE:

Altered / Fraudulent Evidence Submitted by:

Jennifer Millner & Eliana Baer of Fox Rothschild

to support Frivolous Domestic Violence Charges

===============================

ABOUT THE ABOVE TEXT:

===============================

  • TEXT IS AN ACT OF FRAUD (ALTERED EVIDENCE). SEE CLEARLY VISIBLE WHITEOUT STRIPS (IN THE IMAGE ABOVE) COVERING FRIENDLY TEXTS FROM THE FATHER.
  • ALTERED EVIDENCE ISN’T ADMISSIBLE IN A COURT OF LAW OR EQUITY, BUT JUDGE WARSHAW ALLOWED MY WIFE MEG WALLACE TO USE THIS TEXT IN ITS ALTERED FORM TO JUSTIFY A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CHARGE AGAINST ME.
  • THIS TEXT MESSAGE WAS USED TO JUSTIFY A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CHARGE AGAINST A FATHER (DEREK SYPHRETT) AND DENY THE FATHER REGULAR VISITATION WITH HIS CHILDREN FOR OVER A YEAR.
  • THIS TEXT IS EVIDENCE THAT THE FAMILY COURTS ARE CORRUPT, AND SEPARATE PARENTS FROM CHILDREN SIMPLY TO CREATE HIGHER CHILD SUPPORT ORDERS BY DESTROYING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LOVING PARENTS AND CHILDREN.
  • THIS TEXT WAS SENT TO 20 PEOPLE ON THE DAY MY TRIAL WAS ADJOURNED, MY WIFE WAS INADVERTENTLY ON THE DISTRIBUTION LIST.
  • THERE WAS NO RESTRAINING ORDER IN PLACE THE DAY THIS TEXT WAS SENT – SO IT MAKES NO SENSE THAT I WAS ACCUSED OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OR PROHIBITED FROM SEEING MY CHILDREN

 

THE STORY OF THE ABUSE OF

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ALLEGATIONS

Story Book Domestic Violence

It has become public knowledge in the legal community that Domestic Violence Restraining Orders are often used during divorce in order for a Plaintiff (usually the wife) to get a temporary custody order and increased child support.

I experienced this twice during my divorce proceedings with Margaret J. Wallace (Meg Wallace). She lied twice to get Temporary Restraining Orders (TRO).

Each time Jennifer Millner / Eliana Baer of Fox Rothschild attempted to coerce me into giving my wife money or more custody (resulting in more money) in exchange for dropping what were fraudulent, frivolous Domestic Violence Complaints.

MY CASE AND

JUDGE WARSHAW, jUDGE DEBELLO, & JUDGE FITZPATRICK

in this article / post about how ridiculous Domestic Violence TRO’s have become in New Jersey I’ve provided an example of one of the most ridiculous Domestic Violence TRO’s ever issued in any state (its mine).

The purported crime I was alleged to be guilty of was sending my wife a text message that stated:

“Yay I got my trial Adjoured until march”

SOURCE DOCUMENT: 2012-12-04 – ALTERED EVIDENCE USED FOR TRO

NOW ASK YOURSELF THIS:

  1. QUESTION: is the above Text Message in anyway an act of DOMESTIC VIOLENCE?

ANSWER: NO … There is no threat. The statement was factual.

2. QUESTION: Is this text a threat to my children’s Wellbeing that SHOULD justify the IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF MY PARENTING TIME?

ANSWER: NO, THIS TEXT HAD NO BEARING ON MY PARENTING TIME OR MY RELATIONSHIP WITH MY CHILDREN.

YET REMARKABLY JUDGE PETER WARSHAW ORDERED THAT I CEASE ALL CONTACT WITH MY CHILDREN AND THAT MY PARENTAL RIGHTS EFFECTIVELY BE TEMPORARILY TERMINATED WITH REGARD TO CONTACT TO MY CHILDREN.

THIS WAS AN OUTRAGEOUS INJUSTICE AND WAS COMPLETELY DISRESPECTFUL TO MY CHILDREN’S DEVELOPMENTAL NEEDS AND MY OWN PARENTAL RIGHTS.

SEE THE TEXT SUBMITTED TO THE COURT HERE:

EVIDENCE:

Here are links to ALTERED TEXT MESSAGES THAT MY WIFE’S LAWYERS (JENNIFER MILLNER / ELIANA BAER) SUBMITTED TO THE COURT AS EVIDENCE THAT I COMMITTED HARASSMENT / DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

THE DOCUMENTS HERE ARE OUTRAGEOUS:

  1. 2012-12-04 – ALTERED EVIDENCE USED FOR DV CHARGE – FOX ROTHSCHILD LAWYERS UNETHICAL
  • NOTICE: THE White out covering the majority of this purported text message that allegedly put my wife Meg Wallace in fear for her life.
  • The text contains a single statement “Yay I got my trial adjourned” … YET SOMEHOW JUDGE PETER WARSHAW CLAIMED THAT THIS WAS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND HE SAID I SHOULD HAVE NO PARENTING TIME AS A RESULT!!!
  • MY 3 AND 5 YEAR OLD CHILDREN WERE SHOCKED AND HEARTBROKEN AFTER OUR REGULAR TELEPHONE CALLS WERE INTERRUPTED WITH OUT WARNING

2. LETTER TO COURT EXPLAINING MY CONCERNS ABOUT MY WIFE’S HISTORY OF LYING TO THE COURT ABOUT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE:

 

CONCLUSION:

i Intend to update this post at a later date with the evidence that I informed the court of my wife and her lawyers fraudulent submission of a ALTERED text message which removed the friendly texts I sent my wife (like “Happy Birthday, Truly… on my wife’s birthday).

But for the sake of publishing this draft version of information I’ll conclude by saying:

My FRO trial was not provided in 10 days as NJ Statutes require, instead the Judge delayed my FRO trial so that I went over a year without seeing my children and without being able to calm my children or let them know that I truly loved them.

This sort of activity by the court and unethical lawyers like Jennifer Millner and Eliana Baer should not be allowed to interfere with the loving relationship that a father like me has with his two children.

Needless to say Meg Wallace (Margaret Wallace) who is a nurse at Lawerence Memorial Hospital should never have attempted to file a fraudulent TRO against an honest man, because her actions and the actions of women like her actually diminish that protections available to real victims of domestic violence and such actions make a mockery of the courts.

In the end I actually believe the Domestic Violence laws should be completely scrapped, and men accused of domestic violence should face criminal courts not “family courts”, because the criminal process is more fair and less rife with abuse. additionally women do not need special laws to protect them, women are perfectly capable of filing criminal complaints and providing evidence and testimony to juries.

There is no need for special DV laws that allow women to abuse the process to hurt men and children who have done nothing wrong.

Lastly I would EMPHASIZE THAT MY WIFE’S DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CHARGES WERE DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS – WITHOUT MERIT OVER 425 DAYS LATER WHEN MY CASE WAS TRANSFERRED AWAY FROM JUDGES IN MERCER COUNTY.

Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick Alleged to Retaliate & File False Criminal Charges

Standard

Baby Judge Stealing Nose

( ACTUALLY JUDGE FITZPATRICK TRIED TO JAIL ME FOR 5 YEARS…  FALSELY…)

================================================

Quick Summary of Facts & Events:

================================================

  • 6/4/2013 Judge Fitzpatrick stripped me of my right to represent myself and appointed both a Guardian Ad Litem & a court appointed Lawyer in violation of:
    • my constitutional right to due process (14th Amendment, U.S. Contitution);
    • New Jersey Rules of Evidence 703; &
    • New Jersey Court Rule 5:3.

She issued a sua sponte order (on the courts own motion) without any evidence or testimony before the court supporting her order. She did not even give me the opportunity to cross-examine or present evidence before issuing the order.

THIS WAS UNLAWFUL AND JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT.

NOTABLY: in 4/2013 I won my last motion before the court and had my wife Margaret J. Wallace (of Gales Ferry CT) found in contempt & my unallocated support enforcement stayed… SO CLEARLY I WAS LEGALLY COMPETENT

NOTABLY: ACCORDING TO SETTLED CASE LAW IN NJ NO COURT COULD DEEM ME LEGALLY INCOMPETENT AFTER SUCCESFFULLY DEMONSTRATING COMPETENCE BEFORE THE COURT IN MY LAST MOTION – SEE KYLE V. VERONA GREEN ACRES   JUDGE FITZPATRICK IGNORED THIS BINDING PRECEDENT… THIS TOO WAS UNLAWFUL.

2. 8/14/2013 Judge Fitzparick apparently fabricated criminal charges against me

3. 8/16/2013 Judge Fitzpatrick apparently retaliated by sitting as a judge in my divorce and a now dismissed Domestic Violence case status hearing and order defaults in both cases on 8/16/2013 (see Mercer County Dockets:  FV-11-725-13K & FM-11-97-13B)

THIS WAS BOTH UNLAWFUL AND A VIOLATION OF COURT RULE 1:12:-1(g).

IMPORTANT: JUDGE FITZPATRICK’S ORDERS FOR DEFAULTS WERE LATER TREATED AS VOID COURT ORDERS AND VACATED – BECAUSE WHAT SHE DID WAS ILLEGAL.

JUDGE FITZPATRICK DID NOT DISCLOSE HER ATTEMPT TO FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST ME, AND SHE THEN SAT TO HEAR CIVIL CASES DESPITE THE FACT SHE FILED A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST ME AND WAS CONFLICTED

IMPORTANT: I was ordered to appear in civil court on 8/19/2013 for a Default hearing in the DV case FV-11-624-13. When I appeared I learned that my wife and her lawyer were told not to appear in court and I was arrested without new charges being filed, without a warrant, and without probable cause I apparently was kidnapped to shut me up

4. 8/18/2013 I WAS ARRESTED AT MY HOME. I POSTED BAIL AND WAS RELEASED FROM JAIL.

5. 8/19/2013 When I appeared I learned that my wife and her lawyer were told not to appear in court and I was arrested without new charges being filed, without a warrant, and without probable cause I apparently was kidnapped to shut me up.

  • There was no warrant for my 8/19/2013 Arrest
  • There was no criminal charges for the 8/19/2013 arrest
  • No Probable Cause was issued for the 8/19/2013 arrest
  • No criminal charges were filed for the 8/19/2103 arrest
  • IT ALL APPEARED TO BE RETALIATION TO SHUT ME UP AND TO KEEP JUDGE FITZPATRICK FROM GETTING IN TROUBLE.

6. In January of 2014 I recorded a phone call with my wife’s lawyer Jennifer Weisberg-Millner of Fox Rothschild. She revealed to me that Judge Fitzpatricks chambers called and told her not to appear in court on the morning  8/19/2013 because I’d been arrested. ODD BECAUSE I HADN’T BEEN ARRESTED IN THE MORNING OF 8/19/2013… ODD BECAUSE THE COURT NEVER CALLED ME TO TELL ME NOT TO COME IN… ODD BECAUSE THESE COMMUNICATIONS WERE EX-PARTE COMMUNICATIONS BY THE COURT WITH MY WIFE’S LAWYERS!

================================================

OTHER ISSUES FROM EARLY IN MY DIVORCE:

================================================

GAVEL DIVORCE

================================================

7.9/2011 My visitations with my children were converted to Supervised visits without a Plenary hearing. When I filed a motion in 9/2011 for Plenary hearing Judge Fitzpatrick refused to schedule the plenary hearing AS REQUIRED BY LAW. SHE ALSO REFUSED TO GIVE ME BACK MY UNSUPERVISED VISITATION.

8. 2011 The Supervised Visitation order was ridiculous it required my wife and me to agree on a supervisor… so my wife just continued to refuse to agree to use any supervisor I wanted to use and refused to pay for supervision. The result was I rarely saw my children for the next 2 years. This was devastating because my children were 2yrs old and 4yrs old at the time and I couldn’t hug, hold, and love them or the next 2 years on a regular basis. IT WAS ABSOLUTELY DEVASTATING AND I NEVER WAS GIVEN DUE PROCESS BY THE COURTS TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE.

9. Domestic Violence Charges by my wife appeared to abused by my wife to separate me from my children. In 2010 my wife filed a DV claim and it was dismissed and she admitted she had falsely stated facts in the complaint. She said I showed up unnannounced despite the fact I had texts from her inviting me to come see the children. Judge Fitzpatrick never held my wife accountable for these apparent lies.

10. In 2012 My wife filed another DV complaint. I was entitled to a hearing in 10 days. Instead Judge Fitzpatrick coordinated with Judge Warshaw and Judge Debello to prohibit a hearing on the DV complaint for over 240 days.

When the case was finally sent to Burlington County the new judge said the Temporary Restraining order Should have never been entered!!

11. Judge Fitzpatrick (or somebody using her user name) created FRAUDULENT COURT DOCUMENTS STATING MY DV CASE WAS 19 DAYS OLD WHEN IT WAS 240 DAYS OLD … THIS OBSCURED THE CASE FROM TRIAL ADMINISTRATORS SO THAT THEY COULD NOT INVESTIGATE WHY MY CASE WAS TAKING SO LONG.

======================================

SEE PROOF HERE:

======================================

12. The DV court order for temporary restraints did not require a psychiatric evalution. but the DV Judges Judge Debello and Judge Fitzpatrick said the would not schedule my hearing unless I went to a psychiatric evaluation (that I consented to go to in the divorce case). I told them I wouldn’t schedule it until the DV matter was handled.

  • JUDGE FITZPATRICK AND JUDGE DEBELLO UNLAWFULLY REFUSED TO SCHEDULE MY DV CASE WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE TRO AS REQUIRED BY N.J. LAW.
  • I researched the DV law and found that a DV case can only require a psych. eval if it is ordered as part of the TRO… In my case it was not!!
  • I told Both Judge Debello and Judge Fitzpatrick regardless of whether I was mentally ill or not it was irrelevant to whether or not I committed a crime, or committed an act of DV… so they needed to schedule the hearing. Additionally I reminded them there was no order for a psych eval in the DV case… THEY IGNORED MY MOTIONS AND LETTERS.
  • MY DV CASE WASN’T HEARD FOR OVER 425 DAYS, WHEN IT WAS HEARD IT WAS DISMISSED BY THE NEW JUDGE!!!
    I WENT OVER A YEAR WITHOUT SEEING MY KIDS BECAUSE THE COURT DENIED ME DUE PROCESS, VIOLATED THE DV LAWS, AND RETALIATED AGAINST ME!

PROOF & EVIDENCE JUDGE FITZPATRICK FRAUDULENTLY MARKED MY CASE AS 19 DAYS OLD WHEN IT WAS 245 DAYS OLD:

CLICK LINK ABOVE TO SEE DETAILS

==========================================================

ALLEGATIONS AGAINST FOX ROTHSCHILD ATTORNEYS INCLUDE:

==========================================================

Note: My wife was represented by Fox Rothschild. They are professional lawyers, but they litigate with a win at all costs strategy that appears to be ignorant of due-process for their client or adversaries.

Jennifer-Weisberg Millner – a lawyer for over 20 years surely should have known that the submissions by my wife of altered evidence were not admissible in court and that submitting such documents was unethical… but she was complicit with it.

Eliana Baer – Testified to false facts on 12/5/2012 by stating I had sent my wife over 12 emails in a single day.. This was a flat out lie and Elaina Baer never submitted any evidence to substantiate this claim. This was unethical and despite my numerous discovery requests Elaina Baer never submitted 12 emails sent in a single day… she lied.

Jennifer Weisber Millner (Jennifer Millner) should have known that both her clients due-process rights and my due process rights were violated for the over 425 days that the DV case wasn’t scheduled, but she allowed it to happen without ever motioning the court for justice or adherence to the court rules.

Jennifer-Weisberg Millner & Eliana Baer have both been lawyers long enough to know that the sua sponte order Judge Fitzpatrick issued to strip me of my right to represent myself was unlawful and a violation of court rules, yet they were complicit with it.

==========================================================

CONCLUSION

==========================================================

1. In the end all of this will cost my wife and I much more time and money to resolve, which only benefits these slimy lawyers from Fox Rothschild.

2. I reported all of my concerns to the A.C.J.C. for Judicial Misconduct, Judge Glenn Grant – Acting Administrator of the Courts, Judge Mary C. Jacobson, etc… all of them just worked to cover this up, even after my cases were transferred to Burlington County where the retaliation continued under Judge John Tomassello who continued to violate my rights and retaliate for Judge Fitzptrick

3. Judge Tomasello is a total scumbag in my opinion. He actually took ex-parte testimony during the divorce trial and refused to allow me to cross-examine the witnesses he did this with. he also along with Judge Bookbinder prohibited me from appearing in court for my own trial dates on 2/18/2014 and 2/19/2014… THIS WAS ALSO UNLAWFUL AND MEANS MY FINAL ORDER FOR DIVORCE IS NOW VOID AND I HAVE TO GO BACK TO COURT FOR MORE TRIAL DATES JUST TO GET JUSTICE THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BY LAW AND BY COURT RULES.

MOST IMPORTANTLY HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE:

N.J. FAMILY COURT IS CORRUPT & INCOMPETENT – THE JUDGES FEEL THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW AND THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE BEST INTERESTS OF YOUR CHILDREN.

ALL THEY WANT TO DO IS HELP THEIR FRIENDS IN THE LOCAL BAR ASSOCIATION FLEECE YOU FOR ALL YOUR MONEY AND THEN ISSUE COURT ORDERS THAT WILL KEEP YOU DESTITUTE AND UNABLE TO HIRE A LAWYER TO GET JUSTICE.

==============================================

CLEARLY THESE PEOPLE MUST NOT UNDERSTAND THEIR OATHS OF OFFICE

…. PERHAPS THEY ARE CONFUSED???

==============================================

Robbing Justice

JENNIFER MILLNER / ELAINA BAER / FOX ROTHSCHILD ARE UNTHICAL AND ALLEGED TO STEAL MONEY FROM ESCROW ACCOUNTS

Standard

Lawyer Lying

=================================================================

HERE IS A SHORT SUMMARY OF

UNETHICAL AND/OR APPARENTLY ILLEGAL THINGS JENNIFER MILLNER AND FOX ROTHSCHILD HAVE DONE TO CREATE CONTENTIOUS LITIGATION

 =================================================================

FOX ROTHSCHILD DOES NOT APPEAR TO CARE ABOUT ITS CLIENTS OR THEIR CHILDREN, THEY ARE TYPICAL LAWYERS THEY APPEAR TO CARE ONLY ABOUT BILLABLE HOURS

DANA JANQUITTO, ESQ  (of Reed Smith)- A FORMER LAW CLERK ALSO GET’S DISHONORABLE MENTION FOR:

HER PARTICIPATION IN ORCHESTRATING A VIOLATION OF A COURT ORDER ISSUED BY THE JUDGE SHE WORKED FOR… SHE ACTUALLY HELPED MY WIFE VIOLATE A COURT ORDER – WITHOUT NOTIFYING THE OPPOSING PARTY OF HER EX-PARTE CONTACT!

SEE DETAILS BELOW:

===========================================================================

MY EXPERIENCE WITH FOX ROTHSCHILDS UNETHICAL OR ILLEGAL TACTICS:

===========================================================================

(this is an edited excerpt from an email sent to Fox Rothschild, my expectation is that they will NEVER directly address their conduct unless I sue them)

To: Eric Sotoloff (Fox Rothschild):

1. Jennifer Millner stole my money from her escrow accountand didn’t provide simultaneous statements – that is theft by deception and the statute of limitations hasn’t run out.

SEE NARRATIVE & SOURCE DOCUMENTS HERE ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB:
https://njcourtcorruption.com/2014/06/22/jennifer-weisberg-millner-jennifer-millner-alleged-to-be-a-thief/

OR SEE ATTACHMENTS WHICH DOCUMENT THE THEFT OF MY MONEY

NOTE: THE LINK TO THE NEWS BLOG ABOVE HAS BEEN READ ON 4 CONTINENTS NOW.

2. Fox Rothschild Conspired with InsiderScore and O’Donnell Newsome to make a false claim on a wages settlement of (gross) $50,000 from InsiderScore. I now have evidence of that. Eric I presume you were involved given that you used to work at O’Donnell Newsome and InsiderScore ironically retained them after Elaina Baer tortuously interferred in my settlement and had it frozen by the court ONLY AFTER YOUR FIRM CONVINCED INSIDERSCORE TO VIOLATE THE CONTRACT

3. Fox Rothschild Retained Dr. Scasta in 2011and didn’t disclose that conflict when Dr. Scasta was appointed to Wallace v. Syphrett in 2013… This was unethical. Shockingly Dr. Scasta didn’t reveal this conflict either, which is simply more evidence that the Mercer County Bar Association and the Courts are corrupt.

 4. Jennifer Millner allowed Judge Tomasello to violate the due process rights of my wife, my children, and myself in a manner that will lead us all back to court, and sadly generate more money for Fox Rothschild, unless my wife (copied to this email) finally get’s smart and realizes she can sue you for malpractice and pain and suffering along with me.  And yes I call her my wife because the Divorce Decree is Void.

5. Fox Rothschild admitted ALTERED EVIDENCE – TEXTS WITH WHITEOUT ALL OVER THEM AND DELETED MESSAGES TO OBTAIN A TRO, ELAINA BAER THEN FABRICATED TESTIMONY AS A WITNESS ON 12/4/2012…. THIS WILL BE REPORTED AND PUBLISHED. THE PUBLIC NEEDS TO KNOW HOW CORRUPT YOUR FIRM IS SO THAT MORE CHILDREN DON’T GET HURT BY YOUR LITIGATION TACTICS FOR PROFIT.  WHAT YOU DO IS NOTHING MORE THAN CHILD TRAFFICKING AND ITS ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING.  I HAVE THE SOURCE DOCUMENTS AND THE FAXES YOU SENT TO COURT WITH THE ALTERED EVIDENCE AND THE CONFLICTING NARRATIVE.

6. MY BANKRUPTCY PRE-EMPTS YOUR COLLECTION OF LEGAL FEES: Fox Rothschild Motioned for me to pay my wife’s legal fees even though I had the contingent liability DISCHARED IN BANKRUPTCY IN 2012… THIS WAS UNETHICAL AND RESULTED IN A VOID COURT ORDER FOR ME TO PAY YOU $100,000 OF MY WIFES $400,000 BILL…. YOU IDIOTS… THE FEDERAL COURT HAS ALREADY BARRED YOU FROM COLLECTING – SEE ATTACHED BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE.

7. Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick Admitted on the Record that Jennifer Millner arranged an illegal / violation of a court order for my wife in 2011 when my wife entered my house without consent, and had the sheriff’s department come in as well for illegal search and seizure of marital property!  This is now documented online and in the court record! My wife was found in contempt because Jennifer Millner and Judge Fitzpatrick’s Chambers consulted ex-parte to have Sheriff’s Enter my home… this alone is a $100,000 lawsuit (tolled thanks to my late discovery of the Sheriff’s side of the story).

Note: the Unlawful Violation of a Court order resulting in the unauthorized  entrance into my home in 2011 was arranged via a call from Jennifer Weisberg-Millner (Jennifer Millner) to Dana Janquitto, Esq (Former Law Clerk to Catherine Fitzpatrick). My presumption is that Dana Janquitto is now working at Reed Smith (www.reedsmith.com) and possibly is a dangerous lawyer because she has demonstrated she works without good ethics.

CLOSING THOUGHTS

MAYBE SOMEDAY JENNIFER MILLNER AND HER ASSOCIATES WILL DECIDE TO MAKE A MORE HONEST LIVING.

IF THEY DO MAYBE IT’LL LOOK SOMETHING LIKE THIS:

Ex Lawyer - Million Dollars

Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick & Alleged Cronyism

Standard

 Crony King

==================================================================

HERE IS A SHORT STORY OF APPARENT CRONYISM IN THE COURTS:

==================================================================

JUDGE FITZPATRICK’S OLD BOSS TOOK A JOB WITH HER HUSBANDS FIRM RIGHT AFTER SHE WAS PROMOTED TO PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE FAMILY PART.

A lot of Lawyers here in Mercer county have commented that my divorce Judge Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick became a presiding judge of the Family part incredibly quickly.

One lawyer John Hartmann revealed that she got the job because her husband was a high profile attorney for Stark & Stark. (John Hartmann is Judge Fitzpatrick’s cousin-in law.. Husbands Cousin).

Well for me the story was too compelling not to investigate – it ended with some tragic discoveries:

Story of the Presumed Judge Quid Pro Quo that bought Fitzpatrick’s Job:

1. Judge Fitzpatrick became a Judge in 2009 she became presiding judge of the Family Part in March 2010 (wow fast right).

2. Her husband is John Sakson of Stark & Stark.

3. Judge Smithison Retired (Former Presiding Judge of the Family Part) about March 2010 and took a Job at Stark & Stark (working for Judge Fitzpatrick’s Husband).

Note:

(a)Judge Smithison allowed his wife to sit on a jury as an alternate juror – the ACJC took no action but sent a letter telling him he shouldn’t do that! A wrist slap for misconduct was appropriate for the A.C.J.C. judicial disciplinary committee, because their job is primarily to cover up judicial misconduct rather than investigate it.

(b) Judge Smithison decided the Megan’s Law Case (he’s got juice).

4. Judge Fitzpatrick worked under Judge Andrew Smithison who was the presiding judge of the FP in 2009

5. THE SHOCKER: My wife’s attorney Jennifer Millner worked as a law clerk in the 80s for none other than Judge Smithison

Note Judge Fitzpatrick & Jennifer Millner also serve on a committee of the Mercer County Bar Association (Bench-Bar Committee). They actually discussed agenda items during my hearings and stated they would continue ex-parte discussions about issues related to my case at the Bench Bar’s next meeting.

Opinion:

It’s hard to have respect for a court system that runs on cronyism at the expense of the appearance of justice and integrity of the system.

Obviously the Judges and Lawyers do not place much emphasis on the appearance of justice or integrity, because if they did, stories like this would not be so common and not go un-investigated or reported.

This is just a small example of how our Judiciary has become the 3rd Branch of Government to fail the people. We are akin to prisoners of our own government than participants in it due to cronyism like this.

I’ve lost all respect for New Jersey and American Government, I really don’t believe the government officials care about anything else but fleecing their victims / ascending on the backs of honest poor people.

================================

Summary & Conclusion:

================================

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

================================

My wife’s lawyer and my judge both worked for Smithson.

My Judge probably bought her position from Smithson in exchanged for giving him a no show job, around the same time Judge Jacobson was promoted to Assignment Judge – so she kept her mouth shut and probably owes Fitzpatrick a favor for that too.

Presumably: Everybody in my case was related via money or favors except for me lol.

Presumably: It follows / is likely that Judge Smithison traded favors for a Job at Stark and Stark that resulted in a unqualified lawyer Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick (per comments from her own clients) lawyer to become the Presiding Judge of the Family Part purely for political considerations and quid-pro quo favors to her old boss Judge Smithson.

Isn’t that quaint…

Very Truly,

A plebeian scumbag & Victim of Legal Cronyism

Serfs hoe

 

Alleged Judicial Misconduct of Judge Bookbinder

Standard

deviljudge

Quick Summary – Punchline:

CLICK LINK BELOW TO SEE COURT ORDER – EVIDENCE OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT:

RONALD BOOKBINDER’S COURT ORDERS VIOLATE THE LAW 2/6/2014 – 3/10/2014 – HE REFUSED TO PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE SUPPORTING HIS DECISION (CLICK TO READ COURT ORDERS)

JUDGE RONALD E. BOOKBINDER’S ILLEGAL COURT ORDERS VIOLATE:

  • THE U.S. CONSTITUTION,
  • N.J. CONSTITUTION,
  • SUPREME COURT RULINGS:
  • BINDING PRECEDENTS OF FEDERAL 3RD CIRCUIT
  • JUDGE BOOKBINDER IS ALLEGED TO HAVE ABUSED HIS OFFICE FOR THE PURPOSES OF BULLYING A SELF-REPRESENTED FATHER
  • JUDGE BOOKBINDER VIOLATED THIS FATHER’S RIGHTS AND EFFECTIVELY SABATAGED THE FATHERS ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN HIS OWN TRIAL FOR CUSTODY OF THE FATHER’S OWN CHILDREN.
  • JUDGE JOHN TOMASELL AND JUDGE JOHN CALL WERE COMPLICIT IN THE VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION AT TRIAL IN FM-03-790-14:
    • Judge Tomasello held trial without the Defendant present, took testimony from the Plaintiff, and refused to allow the Defendant to cross-examine the Plaintiff
    • Judge Tomasello refused to hear the Defendant’s immediate appeal (a statutory right of the Defendant) in FV-03-1154-14
    • Judge John Call was the complicit presiding (Supervising) judge.

================================================

EVIDENCE OF JUDGE BOOKBINDER’S JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

(supported by Judge John Call & Judge John Tomasello):

===================================================

RONALD BOOKBINDER’S COURT ORDERS VIOLATE THE LAW 2/6/2014 – 3/10/2014 – HE REFUSED TO PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE SUPPORTING HIS DECISION (CLICK TO READ COURT ORDERS)

1. A Father ((Self-Represented / Pro Se litigant) prohibited from appearing in court for his own Trial!   THIS IS A VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO ACCESS THE COURTS.

2. Father (Self Represented / Pro Se Litigant) prohibited from meeting with Ombudsman to discuss his concerns.

  • This order was issued ex-parte with no notice & no hearing to the Father (no due process)
  • Order was only put in writing after the Father confronted Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder

3. Father (Self Represented / Pro Se Litigant) subjected to illegal court order that violated U.S. Supreme Court Decisions in Haines v. Kerner that permit a pro-se litigant to file pleadings contrary to court rules and procedures.

4. Father (Self Represented / Pro Se Litigant) Prohibited from viewing his own divorce files by court order

5. Judge Bookbinder  appears to have committed felony witness tampering in in State v. Syphrett System #03-2950-01 by admitting he consulted privately with a witness in State v. Syphrett about the case prior to the trial. He allowed the witness Judge Mary C. Jacobson to recommend bail conditions and civil restraints against Mr. Syphrett (the case was ultimately dismissed without any trial via highly unusual ex-parte motion by Prosecutor Joseph Bocchini of Mercer County).

 

===============================================

HOW THE LAW WAS VIOLATED BY JUDGE BOOKBINDER

===============================================

Fingers Crossed Oath

===============================================

After having my civil and criminal cases transferred to Burlington because Judges in Mercer County violated my rights, the apparent retaliation by judges continued in Burlington County via all manner of strange happenings.

1. Judge Bookbinder Consulted the Mercer County Judges despite the fact that Judge Mary C. Jacobson, Judge Pedro Jimenez, and Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick had been recused from my cases. THIS WAS BIZARRE!

2. Judge Bookbinder issued civil restraints against my access of the court without presenting any evidence to support these restraints. This was a violation of the law of the land per U.S. Supreme Court: Elrod v. Burns (1976)

See here where Elrod v. Burns clearly states that the government can not restrain a citizen’s 1st Amendment free speech without producing a burden of proof… Judge Bookbinder ignored this and acted as a tyrant rather than a Judge – in doing so he acted without subject matter jurisdiction.

=========================================================

LEGAL DECISIONS SUPPORTING MY ALLEGATIONS:

 Court Order Judge

=========================================================

  • Judge Bookbinder’s Violation of Supreme Courts Law (Elrod v. Burns & Haines v. Kerner) – Click Underlined Links to read:
    • NOTE THE U.S. SUPREME COURT FINDINGS IN  Elrod v. Burns, 427 US 347 – 1976 pursuant Buckley v. Valeo:

“Though First Amendment rights are not absolute, they may be curtailed only by interests of vital importance, the burden of proving the existence of which rests upon the government”

“Though First Amendment rights are not absolute, they may be curtailed only by interests of vital importance, the burden of proving the existence of which rests upon the government”

Haines v. Kerner Specifically States the Following:

“We cannot say with assurance that under the allegations of the pro se complaint, which we hold to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers, it appears ‘beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.’ Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41,45 46 (1957). See Dioguardi v. Durning, 139 F.2d 774 (CA2 1944)”

JUDGE BOOKBINDER SHOWED CONTEMPT FOR THE U.S. SUPREME COURT AND DECIDED HIS COUNTY COURT WAS ABOVE THE SUPREME COURT RULING – THIS VIOLATES THE LAW OF THE LAND!

=========================================================

EVIDENCE OF

THE ALLEGED JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT & ALLEGED FELONIES:

=========================================================

Magnify Glass FACTS

=========================================================

Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder issued a court order on 2/6/2014 and others which prohibited a father from appearing in court for the father’s own divorce, custody litigation!

THIS WAS A VIOLATION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION 14TH AMENDMENT.

SEE COURT ORDERS HERE:

2014-02-06 and 14-2-19 and 14-3-10 COURT ORDERS BOOKBINDER

List of Illegal Aspects of these Court Orders:

1. Pro Se Defendant prohibited from appearing in court without EXPRESS PERMISSION of a Superior Court Judge (Regardless of whether the Defendant had a trial date)!!

2.Pro Se Defendant prohibited from filing contrary to the court rules, even though U.S. Supreme Court and Third Circuit of Federal Court has issued precedent setting decisions that state a Pro Se Defendant need not follow the court rules or follow court procedures in pleadings or filings. See Decisions in:

  • Third Circuit Binding Precedents – Clearly Make Judge Bookbinder’s Court orders illegal / Void
      • In Picking: the plaintiffs civil rights was 150 pages and described by a federal judge as “inept.” Nevertheless, it was held: Where a plaintiff pleads pro-se in a suit for protection of civil rights, the court should endeavor to construe plaintiffs pleading without regard to technicalities.     (
    • Todaro v. Bowman, 872 F.2d 43, 44 n. 1, 3d Cir. 1989 (Click this Link):
      • Findings of Todaro Court:  As a pro se litigant Todaro is held to less stringent pleading standards and we will afford him a liberal interpretation of our procedural rules. We will, therefore, consider the first amendment claim as properly before us. (iv) McTeague v. Sosnowski, 617 F.2d 1016, 1019 (3d Cir.1980).

 

===================================================

ABOUT JUDGE RONALD E. BOOKBINDER:

===================================================

Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder has a reputation in Burlington County for being a gregarious, even tempered Judge, with a keen mind for Municipal Ordinances and Laws.

I don’t Dispute that.

However: I have seen Judge Ronald Bookbinder apparently commit crimes of Official Misconduct (a felony) and violate his oath of office and the United States Constitution.

 

===================================================

CONCLUSION:

===================================================

I am a first person witness to a Superior Court Judge of New Jersey deciding that he is ABOVE THE LAW

I have witnessed Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder show complete disrespect for U.S. Supreme Court rulings, the Constitution, court rules, and “THE LAW”.

Everybody who reads this blog and views these court orders is now also a witness to the fact that Judge Bookbinder has diminished the integrity of the court and violated his oath of Office.

 The End Loonie Toons