Tag Archives: Family Court Fraud

THE COURT: Threatens Dad’s life & has no real rules

Standard

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

BURLINGTON COUNTY (VINCINAGE 3)

IS A JUDICIAL HELL-HOLE AND NOTHING ELSE

Scales Flaiming

TO WIT:

,

THE CERTIFICATION AND EXHIBITS PROVIDED TO US

BY MR. SYPHRETT’S COUNSEL INCLUDE PROOFS OFALLEGED:

  • Obstruction of Justice
  • Witness Tampering, by Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder
  • Criminal Harrassment, by a Judge
  • Unlawful obstruction of Justice by the Administrative Office of the Courts (Susana J. Morris)

BUT THAT IS JUST THE BORING STUFF FOR STARTERS,

THE UNIQUE STUFF INCLUDES:

Serfs Dont fight back

(THIS GUY AND….)

 

  • A MOTION FILED BY Mr. Syphrett into a FV Docket where the Plaintiff is an ex-girlfriend, who is alleged to have committed fraud upon the court and false statements of fact (Kathryn Bischoff, Katy Elizabeth, among other A.K.A.s)

 

  • THE CROSS MOTION WAS FILED BY A THIRD PARTY... Mr. Syphrett’s wife… yet she is not a party to the underlying motion! …. this is INSANELY UNLAWFUL!

  • The cross motion was filed with cross motion fees, and asks for marital relief in a matter opened as a FV matter, which included a trial that Mr. Syphrett was probibited by court order from appearing at as a self-represented litigant  (SEE THE ORDERS ATTACHED TO THE CERTIFICATION.

 

  • MR. SYPHRETT IS PERMANENTLY DISABLED AND NOW IN FEAR FOR HIS LIFE BECAUSE THE JUDGES CONTINUE TO VIOLATE THE LAW. HE IS NOW MOVING TO ANOTHER STATE AS WE WRITE.

 

  • MR. SYPHRETT’S WIFE WAS AWARDED CHILD SUPPORT BASED ON A FICTITIOUS IMPUTED INCOME THAT WAS 1000% OVER HIS 2013 income and  400% over his 2012 income. His wife has refused to file a change of circumstance, and now collects about $3,300 per month from Social Security benefits assocaited with her husband….she is taking advantage of a disabled man, but she also now wants to have him prevented from filing with the court or getting updates about his own children.

 

  • mr. syphrett’s custody was taken away and his parental rights terminated via ex-parte proceedings by “Judge” John Tomasello , and a sua sponte issuance of civil restraints without notice to the Defendant of the motion…. THIS IS ALL UNLAWFUL OF COURSE… BUT IT IS GOING ON IN BURLINGTON COUNTY.

 

SEE MR. SYPHRETT’S REPLY CERTIFICATION, DETAILING HIS PALPABLE FEAR FOR HIS LIFE… HE SAID HE RUSHED THE CERTIFICATION, AT THE LAST SECOND, SO IT IS HORRIBLY WRITTEN, BUT I THINK IT SPEAKS TO THE LEVEL AT WHICH THE COURT WILL ATTEMPT TO LITERALLY KILL A GOOD FATHER WHO JUST WANTS  JUSTICE FOR HIMSELF AND HIS KIDS.

 

 

Kangaroo Court Judge

 

SEE THE PROOF AND DETAILS HERE:

2014-10-24 – FV-03-1154-14 Reply Cert to FM-03-790-14 – WTF

Alleged Judicial Misconduct of Judge Bookbinder

Standard

deviljudge

Quick Summary – Punchline:

CLICK LINK BELOW TO SEE COURT ORDER – EVIDENCE OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT:

RONALD BOOKBINDER’S COURT ORDERS VIOLATE THE LAW 2/6/2014 – 3/10/2014 – HE REFUSED TO PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE SUPPORTING HIS DECISION (CLICK TO READ COURT ORDERS)

JUDGE RONALD E. BOOKBINDER’S ILLEGAL COURT ORDERS VIOLATE:

  • THE U.S. CONSTITUTION,
  • N.J. CONSTITUTION,
  • SUPREME COURT RULINGS:
  • BINDING PRECEDENTS OF FEDERAL 3RD CIRCUIT
  • JUDGE BOOKBINDER IS ALLEGED TO HAVE ABUSED HIS OFFICE FOR THE PURPOSES OF BULLYING A SELF-REPRESENTED FATHER
  • JUDGE BOOKBINDER VIOLATED THIS FATHER’S RIGHTS AND EFFECTIVELY SABATAGED THE FATHERS ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN HIS OWN TRIAL FOR CUSTODY OF THE FATHER’S OWN CHILDREN.
  • JUDGE JOHN TOMASELL AND JUDGE JOHN CALL WERE COMPLICIT IN THE VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION AT TRIAL IN FM-03-790-14:
    • Judge Tomasello held trial without the Defendant present, took testimony from the Plaintiff, and refused to allow the Defendant to cross-examine the Plaintiff
    • Judge Tomasello refused to hear the Defendant’s immediate appeal (a statutory right of the Defendant) in FV-03-1154-14
    • Judge John Call was the complicit presiding (Supervising) judge.

================================================

EVIDENCE OF JUDGE BOOKBINDER’S JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

(supported by Judge John Call & Judge John Tomasello):

===================================================

RONALD BOOKBINDER’S COURT ORDERS VIOLATE THE LAW 2/6/2014 – 3/10/2014 – HE REFUSED TO PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE SUPPORTING HIS DECISION (CLICK TO READ COURT ORDERS)

1. A Father ((Self-Represented / Pro Se litigant) prohibited from appearing in court for his own Trial!   THIS IS A VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO ACCESS THE COURTS.

2. Father (Self Represented / Pro Se Litigant) prohibited from meeting with Ombudsman to discuss his concerns.

  • This order was issued ex-parte with no notice & no hearing to the Father (no due process)
  • Order was only put in writing after the Father confronted Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder

3. Father (Self Represented / Pro Se Litigant) subjected to illegal court order that violated U.S. Supreme Court Decisions in Haines v. Kerner that permit a pro-se litigant to file pleadings contrary to court rules and procedures.

4. Father (Self Represented / Pro Se Litigant) Prohibited from viewing his own divorce files by court order

5. Judge Bookbinder  appears to have committed felony witness tampering in in State v. Syphrett System #03-2950-01 by admitting he consulted privately with a witness in State v. Syphrett about the case prior to the trial. He allowed the witness Judge Mary C. Jacobson to recommend bail conditions and civil restraints against Mr. Syphrett (the case was ultimately dismissed without any trial via highly unusual ex-parte motion by Prosecutor Joseph Bocchini of Mercer County).

 

===============================================

HOW THE LAW WAS VIOLATED BY JUDGE BOOKBINDER

===============================================

Fingers Crossed Oath

===============================================

After having my civil and criminal cases transferred to Burlington because Judges in Mercer County violated my rights, the apparent retaliation by judges continued in Burlington County via all manner of strange happenings.

1. Judge Bookbinder Consulted the Mercer County Judges despite the fact that Judge Mary C. Jacobson, Judge Pedro Jimenez, and Judge Catherine Fitzpatrick had been recused from my cases. THIS WAS BIZARRE!

2. Judge Bookbinder issued civil restraints against my access of the court without presenting any evidence to support these restraints. This was a violation of the law of the land per U.S. Supreme Court: Elrod v. Burns (1976)

See here where Elrod v. Burns clearly states that the government can not restrain a citizen’s 1st Amendment free speech without producing a burden of proof… Judge Bookbinder ignored this and acted as a tyrant rather than a Judge – in doing so he acted without subject matter jurisdiction.

=========================================================

LEGAL DECISIONS SUPPORTING MY ALLEGATIONS:

 Court Order Judge

=========================================================

  • Judge Bookbinder’s Violation of Supreme Courts Law (Elrod v. Burns & Haines v. Kerner) – Click Underlined Links to read:
    • NOTE THE U.S. SUPREME COURT FINDINGS IN  Elrod v. Burns, 427 US 347 – 1976 pursuant Buckley v. Valeo:

“Though First Amendment rights are not absolute, they may be curtailed only by interests of vital importance, the burden of proving the existence of which rests upon the government”

“Though First Amendment rights are not absolute, they may be curtailed only by interests of vital importance, the burden of proving the existence of which rests upon the government”

Haines v. Kerner Specifically States the Following:

“We cannot say with assurance that under the allegations of the pro se complaint, which we hold to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers, it appears ‘beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.’ Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41,45 46 (1957). See Dioguardi v. Durning, 139 F.2d 774 (CA2 1944)”

JUDGE BOOKBINDER SHOWED CONTEMPT FOR THE U.S. SUPREME COURT AND DECIDED HIS COUNTY COURT WAS ABOVE THE SUPREME COURT RULING – THIS VIOLATES THE LAW OF THE LAND!

=========================================================

EVIDENCE OF

THE ALLEGED JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT & ALLEGED FELONIES:

=========================================================

Magnify Glass FACTS

=========================================================

Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder issued a court order on 2/6/2014 and others which prohibited a father from appearing in court for the father’s own divorce, custody litigation!

THIS WAS A VIOLATION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION 14TH AMENDMENT.

SEE COURT ORDERS HERE:

2014-02-06 and 14-2-19 and 14-3-10 COURT ORDERS BOOKBINDER

List of Illegal Aspects of these Court Orders:

1. Pro Se Defendant prohibited from appearing in court without EXPRESS PERMISSION of a Superior Court Judge (Regardless of whether the Defendant had a trial date)!!

2.Pro Se Defendant prohibited from filing contrary to the court rules, even though U.S. Supreme Court and Third Circuit of Federal Court has issued precedent setting decisions that state a Pro Se Defendant need not follow the court rules or follow court procedures in pleadings or filings. See Decisions in:

  • Third Circuit Binding Precedents – Clearly Make Judge Bookbinder’s Court orders illegal / Void
      • In Picking: the plaintiffs civil rights was 150 pages and described by a federal judge as “inept.” Nevertheless, it was held: Where a plaintiff pleads pro-se in a suit for protection of civil rights, the court should endeavor to construe plaintiffs pleading without regard to technicalities.     (
    • Todaro v. Bowman, 872 F.2d 43, 44 n. 1, 3d Cir. 1989 (Click this Link):
      • Findings of Todaro Court:  As a pro se litigant Todaro is held to less stringent pleading standards and we will afford him a liberal interpretation of our procedural rules. We will, therefore, consider the first amendment claim as properly before us. (iv) McTeague v. Sosnowski, 617 F.2d 1016, 1019 (3d Cir.1980).

 

===================================================

ABOUT JUDGE RONALD E. BOOKBINDER:

===================================================

Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder has a reputation in Burlington County for being a gregarious, even tempered Judge, with a keen mind for Municipal Ordinances and Laws.

I don’t Dispute that.

However: I have seen Judge Ronald Bookbinder apparently commit crimes of Official Misconduct (a felony) and violate his oath of office and the United States Constitution.

 

===================================================

CONCLUSION:

===================================================

I am a first person witness to a Superior Court Judge of New Jersey deciding that he is ABOVE THE LAW

I have witnessed Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder show complete disrespect for U.S. Supreme Court rulings, the Constitution, court rules, and “THE LAW”.

Everybody who reads this blog and views these court orders is now also a witness to the fact that Judge Bookbinder has diminished the integrity of the court and violated his oath of Office.

 The End Loonie Toons

 

 

NEW JERSEY MOTHER VICTIMIZED BY COURTS FOR $1.4 MILLION

Standard


FCLUlogoB2

STOP LEGAL ABUSE OF A MOTHER

New Jersey Court Defrauds Mother of $1.4M in Legal
Fees & Eliminates All Parenting Rights

Mother Launches $400M Suit Against Judiciary

Demand Judge Sogluizzo Step Down
CONTACT STU RABNER & GLENN GRANT TODAY
stuart.Rabner@judiciary.state.nj.us
glenn.grant@judiciary.state.nj.us

Family Court – The Brilliant Racket (TM)
Remember: It’s Conflict For Cash

Actual Plea Being Ignored By Rabner & Grant:

Messrs. Grant, and Chief Justice Rabner:

On May 2,2014, I filed a civil complaint in the Hudson County Law Division, Civil Part, against Hudson County Family Court Judge, Maureen Sogluizzo, P.J.F.P., Hudson County Vicinage, Superior Court and State of New Jersey. I filed for Jury Demand, Demand for Discovery and Deposition Notice against Maureen Sogluizzo In Official capacity as a Judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Maureen Sogluizzo, in “personal” capacity and as employee of Corporation of State of New Jersey (also defined as person”); Hudson County Court Vicinage; Superior Court of New Jersey; State of New Jersey in its corporate “personal” capacity, jointly, severally and,/or in the alternative.

On May 6,2014, I received an Order From Judge Peter F. Bariso Jr., A.J.S.C who is the assignment Judge of Hudson County, stating the following “On motion of this court sua sponte, in order to preserve the appearance unbiased hearing, IT IS ON THIS 6th DAY OF MAY, 2014, ORDERED that venue be transferred to Essex County for disposition by a Superior Court Judge to be designated by the Assignment Judge.”

On May 13,2014, I received a track assignment notice from Essex County – Civil Division notifying me of a new Docket number, ESX L-003415’1,4 (EXHIBI #3) On May L9,2OT4,I filed a motion with Hudson County Assignment Judge Bariso to disqualify/recuse Defendant Judge Maureen Sogluizzo. Judge Bariso clearly stated in his Order, dated May 6, 2074,that there was a conflict of Interest, and in order to show impartiality and lack of bias, the case was transferred to Essex County from Hudson County so I could get a fair hearing.

Judge Maureen Sogluizzo who is now a Defendant in this instant case refuses to disqualify herself from my family court matter, Docket No. FM-09-1722-09, and wants to conduct two (2) hearings in a family court Judge capacity on the 13th of June,2014, where plaintiff ex-husband, (name redacted), wishes to sanction me for no reason other than he and his former attorneys at the Beilan, Miklos & Makrogiannis law firm (whom I sued in an earlier lawsuit and are no longer representing my former husband because of conflict of- interest and lack of impartiality; or so I think) are in concert with Judge Sogluizzo and want to extort money from me.

Defendant Judge Sogluizzo wrongfully ordered the relocation of my minor daughter to North Carolina in direct contravention to six (6) evaluation reports from experts, including psychiatrists and psychologists, three (3) of which were appointed by her who stated that I should have had unsupervised shared parenting at the least and sole custody because the father who had his own agenda to remove the mother from the child’s life through the relocation and parental alienation. My former husband has been in North Carolina since July 2013 and my daughter is suffering severe emotional distress since being removed from my custody, and New Jersey, where all of her friends, school, therapists, and maternal family are. My former husband has no family in the United States.

Defendant Judge Sogluizzo acted improperly and denied my former husband’s motion for relocation, calling it inimical to the child’s “best interests” because of the aforementioned reasons to not allow the child to move because everything for her is in New Jersey. Within 20 days Defendant Sogluizzo changed her mind and sent my daughter to North Carolina with my former husband-without the prerequisite plenary hearing involving a “Baures v. Lewis ” relocation hearing, and without a “best interest” hearing. Defendant Judge Sogluizzo postponed the plenary hearing, because she told me that her mother-in-law died and that if I don’t drop the plenary hearing (at that time), I would have to wait another 3 months to have overnight visitation with my then 7 year-old daughter. Defendant Judge Sogluizzo also has ignored various motions where I have requested equal time with my daughter. This is all supported by all mental health evaluation expert reports but she ignores it and now has set up a hearing on June 23rd, 2013,which is to be for an expansion of my time with my child and the entire summer parenting time with my child.

In light of the law suit which makes her a Defendant, Judge Sogluizzo will now act in a vindictive fashion violating Canon 3 of the NJ Code of Judicial Conduct (Judge must be impartial). As a defendant she is not capable of being impartial and must be disqualified immediately from my case as an acting Judge. Most importantly all parties and the minor child now reside in North Carolina. I am only using the above address in care-of (Under my mother) because I am in and out of the state moving. Also under the UCCJEA, New Jersey’s exclusive, continuing jurisdiction is retained until a court of this State determines that neither the child, or the child and one parent have a significant connection with this state, and that substantial evidence is no longer available in this state concerning the child’s care, protection, training and personal relationships. My former husband and my child moved to North Carolina as of July 1,2013. My former husband has taken up a job working for a large bank there and has married again. The child has been enrolled in school in North Carolina and is completing her Grade 2 in North Carolina. She goes to doctors and therapists in North Carolina and has no further contacts in New Jersey, other than her maternal grandparents and cousins whom she visits when with me. I have now established a residence and driver’s license in North Carolina. The case must be transferred to North Carolina given the two (2) sets of circumstances. I attach case law to support the transfer of Jurisdiction to North Carolina courts where all parties are scheduled for a hearing on June 9,2014 through a complaint that was filed in April 2014.

Defendant Judge Sogluizzo continues to act in a biased fashion and has financially and emotionally ruined me and my family, including ruining the well-being of my daughter. I would strongly request that in the interest of impartiality, and integrity of the courts, that Defendant Judge Sogluizzo no longer hear any of my matters and be removed from my case, because not only is she the defendant in my civil action in Essex County,but under the UCCJEA, she no longer has jurisdiction over any of the parties or the child.

Respectfully:

Monisha Shivani

Hon. Peter Bariso, A.J.S.C. (fax no. (201) 795-0725,
Judge Maureen Sogluizzo, P.J.F.P. (fax no. (201) 795-6199)

Families Civil Liberties Union
www.fclu.org

ALLEGED CRIMES OF: Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder & Judge Mary C. Jacobson

Quote

judgeinjailforgamblingfeb12

Introduction to Alleged Crimes:

Below are emails I sent to Mercer County Prosecutors Office and Burlington County Prosecutor’s Offices along with the evidence included in the links below.

I doubt the Prosecutors will prosecute these cases because they are likely fearful of retaliation from the judges’ and the judges’ political allies.

For that reason I have posted this information in public view so that the public can become aware of the unethical self-dealing within the judiciary.

New Jersey Courts are lawless and the judges do not hold themselves accountable to the United States Constitution or their Judicial Oaths (Judicial Canons).

Below I’ve included a summary and actual emails that I sent to the local prosecutor offices, to supplement my complaint to the FBI and Supreme Court of New Jersey.

=====================================

Quick Take Summary of Alleged Crimes

=====================================

gavel2

1) Judge Bookbinder issued court orders that violated the United States Constitution in order to obstruct or deny me access to the court. He literally prohibited me from appearing at my own trials to face the accusers in both a criminal case and my divorce… OUTRAGEOUS!

2) Judge Bookbinder consulted / conspired with Judge Jacobson as denoted in hearing transcripts of State v. Syphrett on 12/24/2013 and 1/6/2014.

In other Words:

He consulted with a witness in a criminal case via ex-parte communications and he refused to reveal the nature of these communications. This led to my allegations of Official Misconduct and Witness Tampering.

RESULTING ALLEGED CRIMES:

2C: 30-2 – Official Misconduct in the third degree 12/24/2013, 1/6/2014, 3/24/2014, 2/6/2014, 2/19/2014, 3/10/2014

2C: 30-6 – A pattern of Official Misconduct in the third degree 12/24/2013, 1/6/2014, 3/24/2014, 2/6/2014, 2/19/2014, 3/10/2014, AND UNKOWN DATES WHERE EX-PARTE ORDERS FOR ESCORT AND RESTRAINTS OF MY ACCESS TO OMBUDSMAN WERE ISSUED VERBALLY OR VIA EMAIL.

2C: 28-5 – Witness Tampering in the third degree on 12/24/2013, 1/6/2014, and about 3/24/2014

=======================================

ACTUAL EMAILS DETAILING CONCERNS & ALLEGED CRIMES 6/27/2014

=======================================

Subject: Formal REQUEST FOR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION: Specific Charges

Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 16:48:24 -0400
From: Derek Syphrett <dsyphrett@gmail.com>
To: prosecutor@co.burlington.nj.us, rbernardi@co.burlington.nj.us, “glenn.grant@judiciary.state.nj.us” <glenn.grant@judiciary.state.nj.us>, ronald.bookbinder@judiciary.state.nj.us, sharyn.sherman@judiciary.state.nj.us, jeanne.covert@judiciary.state.nj.us, jbocchini@mercercounty.org, mnardelli@mercercounty.org, John Call <John.Call@judiciary.state.nj.us>, Divorce – John Rooney <john@rooneyphillylawyer.com>

The record of State v. Syphrett will show that on 12/24/2013 and 1/6/2014 both Judge Covert and Judge Bookbinder referenced Judge Bookbinder’s ex-parte consultation with Mary C. Jacobson a presumed witness in State v. Syphrett.

I have audio transcripts of both of these hearings.

 

ALLEGED WITNESS TAMPERING:

Further on about 3/24/2014 Judge Bookbinder insisted he might continue to consult Mary C. Jacobson despite my lawyer and my objection to the same during a status conference call held on about that date.

SEE PROOF THAT JUDGE JACOBSON WAS A WITNESS IN STATE V. SYPHRETT HERE:

2014-08-18 – SHERIFFS INVESTIGATIVE REPORT – Redacted

 

ALLEGED OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT:

Further with regard to Judge Bookbinder’s void court orders of 2/6/2014, 2/19/2014, and 3/10/2014 I believe official Misconduct occurred as those court orders actually prohibited me from appearing in court for my own trials as a self-represented litigant and a real party of interest. Further Judge Bookbinder issued other court orders restraining me from meeting with the Ombudsman and with regard to having me harrassed by sheriff’s escorts via sua sponte orders off the record, which were only put on the record when I discovered such orders had been issued via conversations with Chip Thompson and Sgt. Potts.

SEE ATTACHED VOID COURT ORDERS HERE:

VOID COURT ORDERS BOOKBINDER

  • These Court Orders Violate the U.S. Constitution in numerous ways, including prohibiting a Defendant from appearing in court at his own trials!
  • These Court orders are also contrary to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Haines v. Kerner which allow for self-represented litigants to operate contrary to court rules.

I believe criminal charges under the following N.J. Statutes can and should be investigated and pursued in the interest of justice, especially considering the gravity of the allegations and the issues being related to public officials and the public interest in a lawful judiciary and the rule of law:

Alleged Criminal Charges:

2C: 30-2 – Official Misconduct in the third degree 12/24/2013, 1/6/2014, 3/24/2014, 2/6/2014, 2/19/2014, 3/10/2014

2C: 30-6 – A pattern of Official Misconduct in the third degree 12/24/2013, 1/6/2014, 3/24/2014, 2/6/2014, 2/19/2014, 3/10/2014, AND UNKOWN DATES WHERE EX-PARTE ORDERS FOR ESCORT AND RESTRAINTS OF MY ACCESS TO OMBUDSMAN WERE ISSUED VERBALLY OR VIA EMAIL.

2C: 28-5 – Witness Tampering in the third degree on 12/24/2013, 1/6/2014, and about 3/24/2014

=======================================

EMAIL TO BURLINGTON COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE:

=======================================

On 6/27/2014 4:19 PM, Derek Syphrett wrote:
Burlington County Prosecutor’s Office / Robert Bernardi:

Please accept this email as a formal request for investigation of Judge Ronald E. Bookbinder with regard to his role in State v. Syphrett. He admitted to consulting a witness in State v. Syphrett (see attached investigative report) with regard to the handling of State v. Syphrett.

Such actions by Judge Bookbinder appear to be contrary to the Supreme Court Precedent set in the Matter of Stephen Perskie (a former superior court judge), they were also definitely violations of the Judicial Canons.

Please note I had requested Judge Bookbinder to avoid embarassing the court and to uphold the integrity of the court by transferring my legal matters from his court, however, he chose of his own free-will to continue engaging in activities that demeaned the integrity of the court and appear to be contrary to the pillars of our justice system. Sometimes people just can’t handle the privilege and power that comes with their jobs, sadly I believe this is such a case.

SEE BOTH THE ATTACHED INVESTIGATIVE REPORT AND THE INLINE ATTACHMENT BELOW DETAILING MY CONCERNS AND EVIDENCE:

REPORT SHOWING JUDGE JACOBSON WAS A WITNESS IN THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION: 2014-08-18 – SHERIFFS INVESTIGATIVE REPORT – Redacted

 

INLINE ATTACHMENT BELOW:
> Hi Kathleen,
>
> (To: Judge Grant & Joanne Dietrich please forward this email and my statements below as a verified complaint to the ACJC – I expect action with regard to paragraphs 3 & 4).
>
> 1. Your response to my O.P.R.A. request did not include a couple emails (listed below as inline attachments) can you explain this discrepancy.
>
> 2. My recollection is that both my lawyer and Michael Nardelli (who is btw a great guy, despite being a Dolphins fan… Go Patriots!) were thoroughly confused and irritated by Judge Bookbinder’s refusal to handle the case in a coherent manner and the following email exchange occurred:
>
> 3. My recollection is that the email exchange (ATTACHED BELOW) occurred after a fairly lengthy status hearing with Judge Bookbinder where both my lawyer and I asked him to transfer the case given JUDGE BOOKBINDER’S consultation with Mary C. Jacobson (a witness in the underlying criminal investigation for State v. Syphrett) about State v. Syphrett and the associated bail conditions and restraints.
>
> 4. The concerns my lawyer and I had related to the fact that Judge Bookbinder apparently violated of Judicial Canon 2 an 3 (ex-parte communication and bestowing and creating the appearance of special influence). It also may have been witness tampering (a felony). Additionally my lawyer and I felt that Judge Bookbinder’s civil restraints violated the United States Constitution and the Judicial Canons.

Subject: Re: Order
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:08:27 -0400
From: John F. Rooney, V <john@rooneyphillylawyer.com>
To: Nardelli, Michael <mnardelli@mercercounty.org>, Derek Syph <dsyphrett@gmail.com>

Mike:

 

I can’t consent to the form, or anything, regarding the case remaining in Burlington County. That being said, you can send it to Judge Bookbinder as it is written, and if Judge Bookbinder sees fit, he can sign it, but i cannot consent to it. Thank you for your understanding.

 

 

John
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Nardelli, Michael <mnardelli@mercercounty.org> wrote:

I used “primary witness”. Let me know if this looks ok.

 

From: johnfrooneyesq@gmail.com [mailto:johnfrooneyesq@gmail.com] On Behalf Of John F. Rooney, V
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 4:58 PM
To: Nardelli, Michael
Subject: Re: Order

 

sorry to be a pain in the ass. Can we change “victim” to complaining witness?

 

John

 

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Nardelli, Michael <mnardelli@mercercounty.org> wrote:

I removed “entry”.

 

From: John F. Rooney [mailto:john@rooneyphillylawyer.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 3:51 PM
To: Nardelli, Michael
Subject: Re: Order

 

not sure. I would just ask that you take out that I consent to the “entry” of the order. I am ok with the “form” of the Order, not its content, or entry. Thanks.

 

John

 

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Nardelli, Michael <mnardelli@mercercounty.org> wrote:

I have no idea if this is even remotely close to what he wants.

 

Michael A. Nardelli

Assistant Prosecutor

Mercer County Prosecutor’s Office

209 South Broad St.

PO Box 8068

Trenton, NJ 08650

609-989-6360

NOT FOR DISCOVERY                       NOT FOR DISCOVERY                               NOT FOR DISCOVERY

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. Access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender so that we can arrange for proper delivery. Please delete the message from your inbox.

Thank you, Prosecutor Joseph L. Bocchini, Jr.

This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com
—

Law Offices of John F. Rooney V
2401 Pennsylvania Avenue – Suite 1C-41
Philadelphia Pa, 19130

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.