LETTER TO NJ SUPREME COURT: RIGHT TO FILE CHALLENGE TO A VOID COURT ORDER

Standard

deviljudge

LETTER TO THE SUPREME COURT HERE

 

COPY OF VOID COURT ORDERS BY

ASSIGNMENT JUDGE RONALD E. BOOKBINDER HERE

(Denying Attorney, Witness of Fact, and Father right to appear for own trial)

COPY OF JUDGE JIMENEZ FRAUDULENT COURT ORDERS & TRANSCRIPTS HERE

(Fruadulently claim a Public Defender was Assigned, No Fact Finding for Order, Warrantless Arrest, No legal notice of “First Appearance” given to Defendant)

 

COPY OF PROOFS THAT JUDGE MARY C. JACOBSON ISSUED TRANSFER ORDERS WITHOUT FACT FINDING IN ORDERS, AND DESPITE THE FACT SHE WAS A PARTICIPANT IN THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION RELATED TO ONE OF THE CASES

HERE:

2014-08-18 – SHERIFFS INVESTIGATIVE REPORT – Redacted

2013-11-22 – ORDER – CASE 13-2502 – Jacobson – Jimenez Recusa

l2014-01-17 ORDER TRANSFER CIVIL DOCKETS

 

 

Judge Liar Pants on Fire

JOHN TOMASELLO ISSUES FALSE FACTS IN OPINION

JOHN TOMASELLO ISSUES FINAL ORDER FOR CUSTODY BASED ON STATEMENTS ATTRIBUTED TO PEOPLE WHO WERE NEVER WITNESSES NOR APPEARED IN COURT

HERE:

2014-10-07 – FV-03-1154-14 Derek Writ Coram Nobis (SEE EXHIBITS)

PickPocket and Loose Women

 

Alleged Mail Fraud, Assault, Harassment of Mercer County Sheriff’s Office: Stop OR I WILL ARREST YOU!

Standard

Lady Justice Soldier

POLICE MISCONDUCT

VS.

“THE LAW”

 

For over a year Derek Syphrett has endured alleged and factually supported assaults, harassment from the Mercer County Sheriff’s Office.

 

TO FINALLY PUT AND END TO THE LAWLESSNESS:

 

MR. SYPHRETT SENT THIS LETTER TO REMIND THE FOOLS IN BLACK THAT THE POWERS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PROSECUTION IN NEW JERSEY ARE NOT RESERVED TO THE STATE:


 

OTHER ALLEGED FELONY CRIMES OF:

ASSIGNMENT JUDGE RONALD E. BOOKBINDER

 

judgeinjailforgamblingfeb12

 

HERE: ALLEGED FELONY WITNESS TAMPERING

IN INTERSTATE CUSTODY CASE & OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

(Sent to Federal Bureau of Investigations F.B.I., Hamilton Field Office, Special Agent Addison)


 

NEW JERSEY IS IN FACT & IN LAW ONE OF THE STATES

WHERE:

 

  1. CITIZENS HAVE THE POWER OF ARREST AT ALL TIMES

  2. CITIZENS CAN PROSECUTE CRIMES IN STATE COURT PURSUANT THE COURT RULES AND OPERATION OF “THE LAW”

  3. AS SUCH CITIZENS ARE THE ONLY LEGAL PERSONS IN NEW JERSEY WHO CAN SERVE AS WITNESS-OF-FACT, ARRESTING PERSON, AND PROSECUTOR.


 

 

 

JUST A REMINDER TO ALL IN NEW JERSEY:

Gadsen Flag

FILED: Writ of Mandamus Served Upon NJ Superior Court

Standard

PickPocket and Loose Women

A SUIT WAS FILED AGAINST THE

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY &

THE MERCER COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE &

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS TODAY

 

AS:

 

A WRIT OF MANDAMUS &

DEMAND FOR ENFORCEMENT OF COURT RULE 1:33

PETITION FOR REDRESS OF A GRIEVANCE (NJ Const. Article I, par. 18)

 

SEE THE HORRIFIC TRUTH HERE:

2014-10-15 – FILED FINAL Writ of Mandamus – Petition for Redress of a Grievance


 

NOTES ABOUT THE SERVICE OF PROCESS:

 

Serfs Dont fight back

1-YEAR AGO A SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE GAVE ME SPECIAL POWERS OF LEGAL SERVICE BY COURT ORDER IN OPEN COURT… I STILL HAVE THEM. I DOUBT THE SUPERIOR COURT REALIZES THIS. SO I SERVED THE PAPERS DIRECTLY TO THE AGENCIES INVOLVED AND PRESUME THE CLERKS WILL COMPLETE SERVICE.

10/14/2014 – I RECORDED MY PHONE CALL WITH THE CLERKS OFFICE: The Supreme Court Clerk lied to me after telling me I could file my writ of mandamus, Petition for Redress of a Grievance, and Demand for Rule 1:33 Enforcement, with my fee waiver forms directly with the Supreme Court.

10/15/2014: at about 12:10 pm I began service at the Supreme Court (a court of limited jurisdiction) to file a writ against the Superior Court, A.O.C., Judge Jacobson, Judge Bookbinder, Judge Tomasello, Judge Pedro Jimenez, Mercer County Sheriff’s Office, Mercer County Prosecutors Office.  MY RECORDING DEVICE IS GOING THE WHOLE TIME. The clerk then tells me I CAN NOT FILE WITH THE SUPREME COURT BECAUSE THEY ONLY HEAR APPEALS FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION…. THIS IS FALSE, SHE OFFERS TO GIVE ME A BROCHURE TO EXPLAIN HER LIE… I TELL HER NO THANKS, I’VE READ THE STATE CONSTITUTION (IN WHOLE), AND A COURT OF LIMITED JURISDICTION CAN IN FACT ACCEPT MOTION PAPERS ADDRESSING A VOID COURT ORDER, AND A WRIT OF MANDAMUS…

THE SUPREME COURT CLERK: TELLS ME TO GO TO THE SUPERIOR COURT TO FILE MY WRIT… I TELL HER I WILL BUT I WILL SEND CERTIFIED COPIES TO THE SUPREME COURT AS IS MY RIGHT.

10/15/2014: AT 12:24 I SIGN IN AT THE SUPERIOR COURT CLERKS WINDOW AT THE HUGHES JUSTICE COMPLEX IN TRENTON … THEY ARE EXPECTING ME ACCORDING TO THE SUPREME COURT (ODDLY). I DELIVER THE PAPERS AND EXPLAIN THAT I AM DEMANDING THE COURT OBEY THE LAWS AND COURT RULES AND THAT REMEDIAL ACTION BE TAKEN WITH REGARD TO MY UNLAWFUL ARREST, THE SETTING OF TWO BAILS FOR A SINGLE CHARGE, AFTER I ALREADY POSTED BAIL FOR THAT SAME SINGLE CHARGE, AND A LITANY OF SIMILARLY RIDICULOUS EVENTS, INCLUDING:

THE SUPERIOR COURT PROHIBITING ME FROM APPEARING AT MY OWN TRIALS… I GIVE THEM A COPY OF THAT CRAZY COURT ORDER FROM JUDGE BOOKBINDER 

10/15/2014 – I served the Administrative Office of the Court (AOC) directly at the Director of the Courts Office. The secretary told me I could not serve the office directly, but that I had to serve the counsel for the office. I refused to take the writ and moving papers back and moved on.

10/15/2014 – I SERVE PAPERS TO THE MERCER COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE AND SHERIFF JACK KEMLER: I demand to finally be told WHY I WAS ARRESTED 8/19/2013, WITHOUT WARRANT, PROBABLE CAUSE, OR ANY BAIL VIOLATIONS 1-DAY AFTER I POSTED BAIL, AND PRESENTED MY BAIL RECEIPT TO THE ARRESTING OFFICERS, WHO REFUSE TO IDENTIFY THEMSELVES TO THIS DAY (one officer was Officer “Lasnyck” or something like that, he gave me a court order from my divorce judge after the arrest, but the sheriff’s office continues to deny they arrested me on 8/19/2013).

10/15/2014 – I then go to the SUPERIOR COURT CRIMINAL COURT HOUSE AT 400 WARREN STREET…. AT THIS POINT SHERIFF’S OFFICERS START HARASSING ME, AND TELLING ME THEY ARE GOING TO ESCORT ME THROUGHOUT THE COURT HOUSE. KEEP IN MIND I AM ACTING AS AN ATTORNEY-IN-FACT AND I HAVE FULL LITIGATION PRIVILEGES (I CAN NOT BE CIVILLY SANCTIONED FOR ANY COMMUNICATIONS RELATED TO MY LEGAL PAPERS OR PROCESS… EVEN IF I YELL AT CLERKS AND COPS…. WHICH I DIDN’T, BUT I DID SPEAK FIRMLY)

… AT FIRST OFFICER BUNCHK STARTS ESCORTING ME… IT TAKES HIM ABOUT 2 MINUTES BEFORE HE THREATENS TO HAVE ME REMOVED FROM THE COURT. I ADVISE HIM THAT THE FBI INVESTIGATED THE SHERIFF’S OFFICE FOR MY ARREST, AND THEY RECOMMENDED PROSECUTION… I TELL HIM HE SHOULD PROBABLY STOP ESCORTING ME BECAUSE IF FOUND IT TO BE A FORM OF HARASSMENT.

…. HE GETS REPLACED BY OFFICER GOGAN (A WOMAN) SHORTLY AFTER THAT

…. THE CLERK TRIES TO REFUSE MY PAPERS, AND SHERIFF’S OFFICER GOGAN TRIES TO TELL ME THAT I NEED TO BE QUIET AND LET THE CLERK TALK.

I TELL OFFICER GOGAN TO STOP INTERRUPTING MY CONVERSATION, BECAUSE IT IS PRIVILEGED (LITIGATION PRIVILEGE) AND SHE CAN NOT IMPEDE OR OBSTRUCT MY COMMUNICATIONS MADE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE…

THE CLERK STARTS YELLING AT ME THEN AND TELLS ME THAT I NEED TO SHOW SOME RESPECT TO THE SHERIFF OFFICER GOGAN

I TELL THE CLERK THAT I AM A CITIZEN OF NEW JERSEY AND AN ATTORNEY AND THE SHERIFF’S OFFICER CAN NOT SANCTION ME FOR COMMUNICATING ABOUT MY CASE, UNLESS I BREAK A LAW… WHICH I NEVER DO (eg felony, or combative stuff).

EVENTUALLY MY PAPERS ARE SERVED UPON THE SUPERIOR COURT – JUDGE JIMENEZ, AND JUDGE JACOBSON….

0001910cba29056841e3b2e8ca7f16074ab

SO NO SURPRISES HERE

THE SHERIFF’S OFFICE AND COURT CONTINUE TO

HARASS, LIE, BULLY, AND OBSTRUCT JUSTICE

… SO WE’LL BE IN FEDERAL COURT SOON ENOUGH

 


 

 

 

Gadsen Flag

 

A REMINDER TO ALL:

 

THIS IS HOW SELF GOVERNMENT STARTED

(SEE ABOVE PICTURE: GADSEN FLAG CIRCA 1775)


DEMAND FOR JUSTICE – Mercer County Sheriff’s Incarcerate A Man and Deny They Arrested Him Unlawfully – WRIT OF MANDAMUS FOR ENFORCEMENT OF “THE LAW”

Standard

Baby Judge Stealing Nose

 

WE THE PEOPLE OF NEW JERSEY WOULD NOT ACCEPT

A JUDGE ACTING LIKE THIS CHILD

(pictured above)

 

SO:

WE CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS

 

OR

 

THIS FRAUDULENT COURT ORDER

(NO PUBLIC DEFENDER WAS EVER ASSIGNED IN 2013)


 

 

Judge TRUTH IS NO DEFENSE

UNLESS WE WANT COURTS WHERE THE TRUTH IS:

NO LONGER RELEVANT

 

 

THEN WE MUST DEMAND ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAW

VIA WRITS OF MANDAMUS LIKE THIS

 

 

TO BE CLEAR:

 

Wall of Shame 1

JUDGE PEDRO JIMENEZ: EXCEEDED ALL LAWFUL AUTHORITY WHEN HE INCARCERATED DEREK SYPHRETT – HE COMMITTED CRIMES IN DOING THE SAME

MERCER COUNTY SHERIFF JACK KEMLER: HAS BEEN COMPLICIT IN COVERING UP A FALSE ARREST AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT BY HIS STAFF

MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR: JOSEPH BOCCHINI IS AWARE OF THE CRIMES COMMITTED HERE AND DID NOTHING WHEN ASKED TO IN WRITTING

MERCER COUNTY PROSECUOR JOSEPH BOCCHINI FILED A MOTION TO DISMISS THE CASE AGAINST MR. SYPHRETT VIA FAX IN VIOLATION OF THE COURT RULES

MERCER COUNTY ASSIGNMENT JUDGE MARY C. JACOBSON: TRANSFERRED STATE V. SYPHRETT TO BURLINGTON WITHOUT PROVIDING ANY FACTUAL BASIS FOR DOING THE SAME, SHE HAS REFUSED TO EXPLAIN IT TO THE ATTORNEY FOR THE DEFENDANT EVER SINCE FOR OVER 10 MONTHS

BURLINGTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE JEANNE COVERT: ACCEPTED A FAXED MOTION AND RULED ON IT IN VIOLATION OF THE COURT RULES AND WITHOUT THE MOTION BEING SERVED TO THE DEFENDANT AT ALL!

BURLINGTON COUNTY ASSIGNMENT JUDGE RONALD E. BOOKBINDER, PROHIBITED THE DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY AND THE DEFENDANT FROM APPEARING AT COURT FOR THE DEFENDANT’S TRIALS SEE THE VOID AND UNLAWFUL COURT ORDERS HERE,  THIS IS EXTRINSIC FRAUD, IT IS ALSO A CRIME OF WITNESS TAMPERING

ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS JUDGE GLENN GRANT HAS BEEN MADE AWARE OF ALL OF THE ABOVE, AND HE HAS NOT INTERVENED TO INSURE PROPER ADMINISTRATION OF THE COURTS

THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT (A.C.J.C.) HAS BEEN SENT DOCUMENTS CONFIRMING CRIMES WERE COMMITTED BY JUDGES AND VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW AND JUDICIAL CANONS OCCURRED, THEY HAVE NOT ACTUALLY INVESTIGATED AND INSTEAD COMMITTED MAIL FRAUD BY TELLING THE COMPLAINANT THAT THE INVESTIGATION AND MATERIALS HAD BEEN PUT BEFORE THE A.C.J.C. WHEN IN FACT A COMMITTEE MEMBER TOLD THE COMPLAINANT THAT HE HAD NEVER SEEN THE COMPLAINT (ASSOCIATE JUSTICE STERN, RETIRED)

 

MERCER COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICERS HAVE ARRESTED DEREK SYPHRETT TWICE WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE OR A WARRANT, AND THEN LATER DENIED THAT THEY DID.

 

MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONS CENTER WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS: IS AWARE OF THE UNLAWFUL INCARCERATION BUT HAS DONE NOTHING TO PROTECT MR. SYPHRETT’S RIGHTS

 

WHILE NO COURT HAS ACTUALLY ENFORCED THE COURT ORDERS PROHIBITING MR. SYPHRETT FROM APPEARING IN COURT, THEY ALSO REFUSE TO ADMIT THE ORDERS ARE IN FACT VOID AB INITIO, BECAUSE THEY VIOLATE THE LAW ITSELF!

 

 

Gadsen Flag

 

TO BE MORE THAN CLEAR:

 

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LEGAL IMMUNITY FROM THE TRUTH

ON THE INTERNET OR VIA PUBLIC OPINION

 

THE ABOVE NAMED PARTIES ARE GUILTY OF TREASON

AND OTHER FELONIES

 

Our Sole Recourse will remain civil and lawful at all times, but

WE will not accept these injustices or allow them to be abided!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The End Writing

TODAY: FOR 2ND TIME: I WAS DETAINED / ARRESTED BY SHERIFF’S OFFICERS

Standard

Bad Cop

TODAY: 8/22/2014 –

DEJA VU… I WAS FALSE ARRESTED 8/19/2013 AT THE SAME COURT HOUSE… NO OFFICIAL EXPLANATION HAS YET BEEN PROVIDED DESPITE MY LETTERS TO THE COURT REQUESTING AN EXPLANATION VIA COMMON-LAW RIGHT OF ACCESS.

I drafted subpoenas for the FV team leader, court clerk, Catherine Fitzpatrick, and Mary C. Jacobson with regard to my re-opened dockets in Burlington County.

I went to the the Mercer County vincinage of THE SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY to get the clerks steal placed upon the Subpoenas prior to serving the same.

THE CLERK REFUSED TO PROVIDE THE SEAL. I WAS TOLD I WOULD HAVE TO GO TO BURLINGTON TO GET THE SEAL. At that point I said that I would allow the woman at the clerks window to serve the subponas via interoffice mail, if she refused to provide the clerks seal. SHE THEN REFUSED TO ACCEPT THE DOCUMENTS AND TOLD ME TO TAKE THEM BACK.

… I THEN REFUSED, and said I consider the documents served since you presented one of the subjects (the FV Team Leader Doug Meckel) with his subpoena, I expect the court to deliver the remainder of the subpoena’s to the subjects who all work here at the court.

====================
After I got out of the elevator
on the ground floor
====================

I was surrounded by 3 Sheriff’s officers (a fourth joined later).

I was told I could not leave the court house.

I asked the Sheriff’s Am i being detained or am I free to go.

Officer Parent said: You are being detained until I figure this out.

The fat black lady at the clerks window then came over to the 2nd floor balcony and said I had left my subpoenas at the clerks window and that I needed to take them with me.

I said: I refuse to touch those papers. They are served.
================
NARRATIVE:
================

The sheriff’s officers told me to step away from the exit

They tried to tell me I couldn’t serve papers after 4:30 because the court was closed.

I told them I arrived before 4:30 and was at the clerks window before 4:30.

I then explained that the Superior Court of New Jersey is “ONE COURT” the clerks here can place seals upon my documents, because ITS ONE COURT. Regardless of which vincinage I appear at all “court clerks” are operating under the authority of THE CLERK OF THE COURT MICHELLE SMITH… WHO ISN’T PRESENT AT ANY SUPERIOR COURT LOCATION.

I THEN ASKED am I free to go or am I under arrest?

Officer Parent: told me that I could not leave and he physically pushed me away from the exit of the court house.

I then told Officer Parent: You just assaulted me. Do not touch me unless you are going to arrest me.

A fourth officer came over and I asked him am I under arrest or free to go. He said the court closed at 4:30 and I needed to leave. I

I told him I’ve been trying to leave for 10 minutes but Officer Parent has arrested me without any probable cause.

He then told me I could go and I left.
========================================
LEGAL ISSUES:
========================================

1. Obstruction of Justice, denial of access to the court (exit)

2. Assault: Officer Parent pushed me

3. My quasi-judicial immunity as attorney-in-fact was not respected by the court

4. My litigation privilege was revoked by staff members of the Court and / or sheriff’s Officers… pursuant Loigman v. Middltown (2006) I can not be sanctioned or punished for communicating with the court or attempting to serve process for cases that are open before the court, when I act as attorney in fact.

5. U.S.C. 18 Section 241 & 242. I went to the FBI office and reported civil rights violations and the assault to the FBI and asked for a full investigation.
===========================================
I RECORDED MY INTERACTIONS WITH COURT STAFF
AND THE SHERIFF’S OFFICERS
===========================================

THE ENTIRETY OF THE ABOVE CONCERNS ME GREATLY AND I DEMAND A RESPONSE FROM THE COURT AND THE SHERIFF’S OFFICE.

I CONTINUE TO BE HARASSED AND INTIMIDATED FOR SIMPLY SEEKING JUSTICE VIA THE LEGAL PROCESS.

Derek C. Syphrett