Tag Archives: meg wallace

COURT REFUSES TO ALLOW ME TO SPEAK WITH OMBUDSMAN

Standard

Justice GaggedArticle Published after Receipt from Derek Syphrett:

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

AFTER MOTIONS I FILED WENT MISSING IN A DV CASE I WAS FOUND GUILTY, THE COURT HAS CONTINUED TO RETALIATE AGAINST MY EFFORTS TO SEEK JUSTICE.

PRIOR TO THE DV TRIAL I HAD REQUESTED TO SEE MY FULL FILE AS I SUSPECTED THE PRIOR RECUSED JUDGES WOULD ATTEMPT TO REMOVE MOTIONS FROM THE FILE TO RETALIATE…. IT APPEARS THIS HAPPENED.

  • 6/7/2013 Motion Stamped Received and discussed on the Record 6/13/2013 was removed from the file before the continued 2/19/2014 trial of the DV (after recusal of prior Trial Judge – MISSING FROM CASE FILE FV-11-887-13 (Kathryn Bischoff v. Derek Syphrett)
  • 12/11/2013 Motion filed for dismissal of DV claim due to recusal of trial judge who issued the TRO. (Kathryn Bischoff v. Derek Syphrett). THIS MOTION WAS DELIVERED TO THE COURT IN TRIPLICATE ON 2 SEPARATE DATES – ITS MISSING
  • 1/12/2013 to 2/4/2013 I sent letters to the court requesting to review my case file prior to the scheduled TRIAL in FV-11887-13, RE-DOCKETED IN BURLINGTON COUNTY AS FV-03-1154-14.
  • 2/6/2014 I WAS PUNISHED FOR REQUESTING TO VIEW MY FILE PRE-TRIAL:

Judge Bookbinder issued an unlawful court order: prohibiting me from appearing in court pre-trial or at trial for any reason without EXPRESS PERMISSION FROM A SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE. This was unlawful because it violates my constitutionally protected rights to due process under the 1st Amendment & 14th Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America (1787 Original Jurisdiction)and the New Jersey Constitution which establish the inalienable right to access the court and to be tried consistent with due-process under the law.

  • ADDITIONALLY I FILED A “IMMEDIATE APPEAL” with regard to the DV charge. This is a rarely used statutory right if you are accused of Domestic Violence in New Jersey – see Statute N.J.S.A.: 2C:25-28i.

An immediate appeal is meant to allow the Defendant to challenge a TRO issuance since the TRO was issued without the Defendant present in court to defend himself/herself.

THE COURT IS REQUIRED TO SEND LEGAL NOTICE AFTER SCHEDULING AN IMMEDIATE APPEAL ACCORDING TO THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROCEDURE MANUAL (link to PDF). IN MY CASE THE COURT NEVER SCHEDULED THE IMMEDIATE APPEAL AND JUDGE PETER WARSHAW ERRONEOUSLY DENIED MY IMMEDIATE APPEAL BECAUSE HE SAID I SHOULD HAVE NOTIFIED THE PLAINTIFF AFTER I SERVED THE PLAINTIFF THE IMMEDIATE APPEAL.

I WAS DENIED STATUTORY DUE PROCESS BECAUSE THE COURT NEVER SCHEDULED THE IMMEDIATE APPEAL.

  • RETALIATION CONTINUED WHEN JUDGE JOHN TOMASELLO THREW ME OUT OF COURT AT TRIAL IN BURLINGTON FOR MAKING MY 1ST AND ONLY OBJECTION IN A DIFFERENT CASE… YET HE IS SET TO BE THE TRIAL JUDGE IN THE POST-TRIAL HEARING DESPITE THE FACT HIS BIAS AGAINST ME IS CLEAR AND CONVINCING!

0001910cba29056841e3b2e8ca7f16074ab

NEW POST TRIAL FILINGS FOR RELIEF

LOOK AT HOW RIDICULOUS THIS HAS BECOME:

THIS WEEK: I have filed post trial motions to confront the corrupted court process.

Here are the recent letters to AND from the court:’

Letters and Letter Briefs set to the court to protest the court’s failure to schedule my immediate appeal:

2014-08-07 TO 14 – LTRS – Biased Court

 

LETTER FROM JUDGE BOOKBINDER

2014-08-14 LTR From Judge Bookbinder

LOOK AT ALL THE PEOPLE COPIED TO THIS LETTER !!!

– New Jersey Clerk of the Courts;

– Acting Director of the Courts;

– Chief of Staff for the Courts, etc

IMAGE OF JUDGE BOOKBINDER’S LETTER

2014-08-14 - LTR BOOKBINDER p1

2014-08-14 - LTR BOOKBINDER p2

Judge Peter Warshaw – THIS ISN’T DOMESTIC VIOLENCE!!!

Standard

DV TEXT ALTERED

ABOVE:

Altered / Fraudulent Evidence Submitted by:

Jennifer Millner & Eliana Baer of Fox Rothschild

to support Frivolous Domestic Violence Charges

===============================

ABOUT THE ABOVE TEXT:

===============================

  • TEXT IS AN ACT OF FRAUD (ALTERED EVIDENCE). SEE CLEARLY VISIBLE WHITEOUT STRIPS (IN THE IMAGE ABOVE) COVERING FRIENDLY TEXTS FROM THE FATHER.
  • ALTERED EVIDENCE ISN’T ADMISSIBLE IN A COURT OF LAW OR EQUITY, BUT JUDGE WARSHAW ALLOWED MY WIFE MEG WALLACE TO USE THIS TEXT IN ITS ALTERED FORM TO JUSTIFY A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CHARGE AGAINST ME.
  • THIS TEXT MESSAGE WAS USED TO JUSTIFY A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CHARGE AGAINST A FATHER (DEREK SYPHRETT) AND DENY THE FATHER REGULAR VISITATION WITH HIS CHILDREN FOR OVER A YEAR.
  • THIS TEXT IS EVIDENCE THAT THE FAMILY COURTS ARE CORRUPT, AND SEPARATE PARENTS FROM CHILDREN SIMPLY TO CREATE HIGHER CHILD SUPPORT ORDERS BY DESTROYING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LOVING PARENTS AND CHILDREN.
  • THIS TEXT WAS SENT TO 20 PEOPLE ON THE DAY MY TRIAL WAS ADJOURNED, MY WIFE WAS INADVERTENTLY ON THE DISTRIBUTION LIST.
  • THERE WAS NO RESTRAINING ORDER IN PLACE THE DAY THIS TEXT WAS SENT – SO IT MAKES NO SENSE THAT I WAS ACCUSED OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OR PROHIBITED FROM SEEING MY CHILDREN

 

THE STORY OF THE ABUSE OF

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ALLEGATIONS

Story Book Domestic Violence

It has become public knowledge in the legal community that Domestic Violence Restraining Orders are often used during divorce in order for a Plaintiff (usually the wife) to get a temporary custody order and increased child support.

I experienced this twice during my divorce proceedings with Margaret J. Wallace (Meg Wallace). She lied twice to get Temporary Restraining Orders (TRO).

Each time Jennifer Millner / Eliana Baer of Fox Rothschild attempted to coerce me into giving my wife money or more custody (resulting in more money) in exchange for dropping what were fraudulent, frivolous Domestic Violence Complaints.

MY CASE AND

JUDGE WARSHAW, jUDGE DEBELLO, & JUDGE FITZPATRICK

in this article / post about how ridiculous Domestic Violence TRO’s have become in New Jersey I’ve provided an example of one of the most ridiculous Domestic Violence TRO’s ever issued in any state (its mine).

The purported crime I was alleged to be guilty of was sending my wife a text message that stated:

“Yay I got my trial Adjoured until march”

SOURCE DOCUMENT: 2012-12-04 – ALTERED EVIDENCE USED FOR TRO

NOW ASK YOURSELF THIS:

  1. QUESTION: is the above Text Message in anyway an act of DOMESTIC VIOLENCE?

ANSWER: NO … There is no threat. The statement was factual.

2. QUESTION: Is this text a threat to my children’s Wellbeing that SHOULD justify the IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF MY PARENTING TIME?

ANSWER: NO, THIS TEXT HAD NO BEARING ON MY PARENTING TIME OR MY RELATIONSHIP WITH MY CHILDREN.

YET REMARKABLY JUDGE PETER WARSHAW ORDERED THAT I CEASE ALL CONTACT WITH MY CHILDREN AND THAT MY PARENTAL RIGHTS EFFECTIVELY BE TEMPORARILY TERMINATED WITH REGARD TO CONTACT TO MY CHILDREN.

THIS WAS AN OUTRAGEOUS INJUSTICE AND WAS COMPLETELY DISRESPECTFUL TO MY CHILDREN’S DEVELOPMENTAL NEEDS AND MY OWN PARENTAL RIGHTS.

SEE THE TEXT SUBMITTED TO THE COURT HERE:

EVIDENCE:

Here are links to ALTERED TEXT MESSAGES THAT MY WIFE’S LAWYERS (JENNIFER MILLNER / ELIANA BAER) SUBMITTED TO THE COURT AS EVIDENCE THAT I COMMITTED HARASSMENT / DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

THE DOCUMENTS HERE ARE OUTRAGEOUS:

  1. 2012-12-04 – ALTERED EVIDENCE USED FOR DV CHARGE – FOX ROTHSCHILD LAWYERS UNETHICAL
  • NOTICE: THE White out covering the majority of this purported text message that allegedly put my wife Meg Wallace in fear for her life.
  • The text contains a single statement “Yay I got my trial adjourned” … YET SOMEHOW JUDGE PETER WARSHAW CLAIMED THAT THIS WAS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND HE SAID I SHOULD HAVE NO PARENTING TIME AS A RESULT!!!
  • MY 3 AND 5 YEAR OLD CHILDREN WERE SHOCKED AND HEARTBROKEN AFTER OUR REGULAR TELEPHONE CALLS WERE INTERRUPTED WITH OUT WARNING

2. LETTER TO COURT EXPLAINING MY CONCERNS ABOUT MY WIFE’S HISTORY OF LYING TO THE COURT ABOUT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE:

 

CONCLUSION:

i Intend to update this post at a later date with the evidence that I informed the court of my wife and her lawyers fraudulent submission of a ALTERED text message which removed the friendly texts I sent my wife (like “Happy Birthday, Truly… on my wife’s birthday).

But for the sake of publishing this draft version of information I’ll conclude by saying:

My FRO trial was not provided in 10 days as NJ Statutes require, instead the Judge delayed my FRO trial so that I went over a year without seeing my children and without being able to calm my children or let them know that I truly loved them.

This sort of activity by the court and unethical lawyers like Jennifer Millner and Eliana Baer should not be allowed to interfere with the loving relationship that a father like me has with his two children.

Needless to say Meg Wallace (Margaret Wallace) who is a nurse at Lawerence Memorial Hospital should never have attempted to file a fraudulent TRO against an honest man, because her actions and the actions of women like her actually diminish that protections available to real victims of domestic violence and such actions make a mockery of the courts.

In the end I actually believe the Domestic Violence laws should be completely scrapped, and men accused of domestic violence should face criminal courts not “family courts”, because the criminal process is more fair and less rife with abuse. additionally women do not need special laws to protect them, women are perfectly capable of filing criminal complaints and providing evidence and testimony to juries.

There is no need for special DV laws that allow women to abuse the process to hurt men and children who have done nothing wrong.

Lastly I would EMPHASIZE THAT MY WIFE’S DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CHARGES WERE DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS – WITHOUT MERIT OVER 425 DAYS LATER WHEN MY CASE WAS TRANSFERRED AWAY FROM JUDGES IN MERCER COUNTY.